So I installed an SSD in my MacBook Pro


Recommended Posts

I bought this 17" MacBook Pro in 2009 and it has served me great in that time not a single problem with any part of it. But I felt recently it was feeling a little sluggish. Especially when compared to my desktop hackintosh.

So I had a few SSD's laying around. None of them were big enough for all my data (Music, Images etc) but big enough for the operating system and my applications. So I bought one of these: http://compare.ebay.co.uk/like/280857760565?var=lv&ltyp=AllFixedPriceItemTypes&var=sbar&cbt=y

Basically it is an optical drive shell that lets you put a 2.5" hard drive in your laptop where the optical drive was. I never use my optical drive anyway and I do have a USB optical drive for my desktop so if I really needed one I could just use that.

So anyway the reason I'm making this thread is to share just how amazingly fast my laptop feels now. I reinstalled Lion on to the SSD (fresh install) and everything is just so fast. It boots in 1/6th the time. Apps open with not even a single bounce on the dock. On my old Hard Disk chrome would bounce 3-4 times before it opened now it opens instantly after clicking its icon.

I'm really impressed. Also if any of you are considering doing the same thing I have a few tips. You know the OS X Alias system? Where by you right click a file or folder and select "Create Alias" these aliases are not just dumb shortcuts like on Windows. These aliases are recognized by the operating system as symbolic links. What this means is for example I can go to my iTunes folder on my Hard Disk right click it, create an alias then move that to where the iTunes folder should be on my SSD. Then when I open iTunes it thinks its accessing my music from my SSD but instead it's using that alias and retrieving it from my hard disk.

By using this Alias feature I've been able to keep all my data (Video, Music, Pictures, Virtual Machine Disks etc) on my Hard Disk but seamlessly use them as if they were on my SSD without losing the fast boot times the SSD provides or the instant launching of all my Applications.

So have any of you guys done this kind of upgrade yourselves?

I know we're in the Mac section of Neowin and I don't own one, but I have to give you two thumbs up on the upgrade. From the day I installed my first SSD on my desktop PC I knew I couldn't use a computer without one.

It's one of the best upgrades you can make considering even pre-built systems come with at least 4GB of RAM and dual-core CPUs.

  • Like 2

Wow, thanks for the hot tip with the Alias feature.

I upgraded my 2011 model to a Vertex 3, and just laugh when I see other people opening up Photoshop or Avid. :rofl:

Its a great upgrade, although you naturally sacrifice space.

It's not really a problem for me though, I like to keep all the important stuff centrally organised on my NAS. :)

You know the OS X Alias system? Where by you right click a file or folder and select "Create Alias" these aliases are not just dumb shortcuts like on Windows. These aliases are recognized by the operating system as symbolic links.

Welcome to 2006 ;)

53rb5k.png

Enjoy your SSD, ive done the same thing on My PC and totally love it. I really don't know why i never got an SSD sooner!

POST screen to ready PC in around 12 seconds, still amazes me 8 months later.

Welcome to 2006 ;)

Enjoy your SSD, ive done the same thing on My PC and totally love it. I really don't know why i never got an SSD sooner!

POST screen to ready PC in around 12 seconds, still amazes me 8 months later.

Actually OS X has had this feature since Jaguar in 2002. I've been using it since Panther when I got my first OS X machine but I thought I'd mention it in this post because it was so relevant :)

I take it you've enabled TRIM support in Lion?

Yup!

Actually OS X has had this feature since Jaguar in 2002. I've been using it since Panther when I got my first OS X machine but I thought I'd mention it in this post because it was so relevant :)

Oh indeed i agree, its almost like it was created for people with SSD's. I can see more people using it in the future now SSD's are really taking off.

Windows does appear to be able to do it with folders outside the Documents folder, just with the command line so OSX has actually implemented it much better if you can do it anywhere with a click.

Oh indeed i agree, its almost like it was created for people with SSD's. I can see more people using it in the future now SSD's are really taking off.

Windows does appear to be able to do it with folders outside the Documents folder, just with the command line so OSX has actually implemented it much better if you can do it anywhere with a click.

Yes it can be done with the command line in Windows. However you can install this application: http://schinagl.priv.at/nt/hardlinkshellext/linkshellextension.html#download

To do it by right clicking folders / files the same way it can be done on OS X. I use this application on my Windows install to run certain steam games on my SSD even though my steam folder and the majority of my games are on a 2TB Hard Drive.

  • Like 1

Enabling TRIM on OS X actually hurts performance:

http://recoverymonke...d-without-trim/

Those tests were performed with Snow Leopard. I'm running Lion. I don't know if that affects anything but Lion has Trim built in and Snow Leopard didn't so the hacks for it back then were more intrusive than the little kernel modification that is done on Lion to enable it.

I've not noticed any speed differences after I enabled it.

  • 3 weeks later...

Is there any guide to follow after installing an SSD in a mbp? I know that when you install it in a PC you have to make several changes so it doesn't affect performance and drive life.

There shouldn't be any changes you have to make if you are using Windows 7. It automatically disables disk defragmenting, and that's really the only thing you have to worry about. I personally disable the paging file since it doesn't affect anything and it's a waste of space on a SSD, but that's just me.

Vice: you do know that instead of alias use the home folder location under users > right click on user and advance settings.

I've done this for 3 MacBook pros I own. 2007/2008/2010

Works great. I always felt the alias wasn't the real way to do it. For me it's changing each registry value to your data drive which is annoying. They need a true "user location" during windows setup so then your boot drive strictly the ssd. And data drive user and application folder. l

Vice: you do know that instead of alias use the home folder location under users > right click on user and advance settings.

I've done this for 3 MacBook pros I own. 2007/2008/2010

Works great. I always felt the alias wasn't the real way to do it. For me it's changing each registry value to your data drive which is annoying. They need a true "user location" during windows setup so then your boot drive strictly the ssd. And data drive user and application folder. l

I don't want everything running from my old home directory on my hard disk. Only my music, pictures and stuff.

I much prefer the Alias way otherwise I would have done it the way you said as I'm aware of it.

Oh I'm glad your away of it! Only think I wanna let you know is that the home directory is only the users. Which is music movies data etc.

Applications will always look for your HD with Mac system files on it.

But now we both know. I never knew aliases would work in the way you wanted.

I bought this 17" MacBook Pro in 2009 and it has served me great in that time not a single problem with any part of it. But I felt recently it was feeling a little sluggish. Especially when compared to my desktop hackintosh.

So I had a few SSD's laying around. None of them were big enough for all my data (Music, Images etc) but big enough for the operating system and my applications. So I bought one of these: http://compare.ebay....&var=sbar&cbt=y

Basically it is an optical drive shell that lets you put a 2.5" hard drive in your laptop where the optical drive was. I never use my optical drive anyway and I do have a USB optical drive for my desktop so if I really needed one I could just use that.

So anyway the reason I'm making this thread is to share just how amazingly fast my laptop feels now. I reinstalled Lion on to the SSD (fresh install) and everything is just so fast. It boots in 1/6th the time. Apps open with not even a single bounce on the dock. On my old Hard Disk chrome would bounce 3-4 times before it opened now it opens instantly after clicking its icon.

I'm really impressed. Also if any of you are considering doing the same thing I have a few tips. You know the OS X Alias system? Where by you right click a file or folder and select "Create Alias" these aliases are not just dumb shortcuts like on Windows. These aliases are recognized by the operating system as symbolic links. What this means is for example I can go to my iTunes folder on my Hard Disk right click it, create an alias then move that to where the iTunes folder should be on my SSD. Then when I open iTunes it thinks its accessing my music from my SSD but instead it's using that alias and retrieving it from my hard disk.

By using this Alias feature I've been able to keep all my data (Video, Music, Pictures, Virtual Machine Disks etc) on my Hard Disk but seamlessly use them as if they were on my SSD without losing the fast boot times the SSD provides or the instant launching of all my Applications.

So have any of you guys done this kind of upgrade yourselves?

Yes, this is the setup I'm using. I've had some flakiness with my optical drive bay adapter and the HDD that is currently connected to it. I think I need to pop my MBP open and reconnect everything...or it could just be that my HDD is going bad. I don't know. Occasionally the HDD will just disappear from the system until i do a reboot. It doesn't happen but maybe once a week or so, but when I had my user accounts on the HDD it caused all kinds of issues when it flaked out on me so I had to move those to my SSD drive.

In all honesty, I wasn't very pleased with my performance while my user accounts were on the HDD. So now my setup is to have them all on the SSD and I have moved my major media off my user home folder and onto the HDD. I've also forwarded my iOS backups to the HDD using a symlink.

My Mid 2012 15" MBP arrived today and after using a SSD in my old Mid 2010 15" I decided to try something a little different. Since the SATA port for the optical drive is more reliable in the newer models, with a OWC Data Doubler I've managed to setup a Stripe RAID with two Corsair Force GT 120GBs (one in optical drive bay and one in standard hard drive bay).

It was a lot easier than I thought and it's unbelievably quick. I too set up my actual user account on my SSD on my previous MBP and just stored media files on the HDD.

I'm currently searching for a decent USB 3.0 External Drive for storage with my current setup (any suggestions?)

Also, does anyone have any particularly good benchmarking tools for SSDs they use?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!