• 0

Best Hosting & Domain


Question

As always I am not really sure if this is the right place to post this but here we go.

I am looking to buy a Domain Name and get hosting as well. I have searched Google for the top places and best prices etc but I am wondering what Neowin thinks...

Your suggestions? I am looking for the cheapest without making it a crappy service.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1088631-best-hosting-domain/
Share on other sites

19 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

As always I am not really sure if this is the right place to post this but here we go.

I am looking to buy a Domain Name and get hosting as well. I have searched Google for the top places and best prices etc but I am wondering what Neowin thinks...

Your suggestions? I am looking for the cheapest without making it a crappy service.

Buy your domain name and hosting from two separate place.

Theres quite a lot of hosting companys out there that are good, a lot depends on budget and what your willing to speed.

I have a interest in a hosting company and while we're cheap as we try to compete with the larger companys we still try to other a quality service as that is the only way to retain customers and grow.

As I won't self advertise, I'd say hostdime above site5 and maybe stablehost

  • 0

A Small Orange http://asmallorange.com/

For a limited time, get 1 year free domain name with an annual hosting plan.

+1 for ASO.

Although, despite the nay-sayers, I have never had anything except good customer service from GoDaddy. So, I'd recommend them, too. Although, they are NOT the least expensive.

  • 0

A Small Orange http://asmallorange.com/

For a limited time, get 1 year free domain name with an annual hosting plan.

Not a bad choice. Always used to have a good reputation. Was bought out by Brent who owns hostgator who is now being bought by EIG, but Brent will keep ASO seperate.

  • 0
Site5 is the best hosting service, I love them, awesome features and stable service along with an outstanding control panel.

Site 5 was good, i used them for a time, but they started to have to many issues. I could not create a new sites without emailing them, then they would tell me how to do it, even though there was a bug in the backend software. I have one client site left there.

I just moved over to Gearhost and love it. Must better, and they actual read the support tickets before talking to you and treatiing you like a newbie.

  • 0

Domains

I have very very particular criteria for domain registrars, so I looked a long time for a good one, there's no "perfect" registrar, but these two come very close:

https://www.gandi.net/

https://www.hover.com/

And if you can afford it, I'd also add https://web.easydns.com/ as a highly favourable option as well. They're the ones who volunteered to take up Wikileaks after the previous DNS provider sold out to the government. So you know they know their ****.

Hosting

for tiny sites: https://www.nearlyfreespeech.net/ - very cheap, quality host for tiny sites, gets very expensive if the site's big due to the billing model

I haven't found any *great* mass-market shared hosting yet. Many big names are decent, just avoid GoDaddy like the plague.

  • 0

I honestly believe GoDaddy is the safest place for a domain and then using CloudFlare as your DNS manager.

aside from, you know, breaking ICANN rules, trying their darnest to prevent you from transferring out, supporting SOPA, or, really, doing just about anything in their power to act against their own customer's interests.

  • 0

No one mentioned hostgater.com? Seems they are the cheapest available?

This could have been just a one time thing, but I had major issues with their VPS. I had two, which gave me endless issues with the host and network. Also, I found that their customer service is lacking. I have also heard great things about them. So you never know. Just my two cents

Also sidenote, not in ALL cases, but when something is a lot cheaper, there is usually a great reason for that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!