Recommended Posts

Hi guys

Have a bit of mistery issue that has cropped up and I'm trying to assit to look into it, but want to seek advice as so far nothing has stuck out.

The setup is a Windows 7 clients, mixture of 32 and 64bit SP1. Domain controller is Windows 2008 R2 SP1.

Domain controller is hosted on a VPS, no local DC on site. There is a S2S vpn between the office to the VPS server with a good up/down link between the two.

PC's are joined to the domain and functioning, its only this 1 niggly thing that has cropped up now when a user changes the password via CTRL + ALT + DELETE and it takes over 2 minutes from hitting the arrow to submit the change to getting a confirmation to say the password was changed. If you hit CTRL + ALT + DELETE whilst the screen is stuck on "Changing Password" with the wheel spinning then you get the confirmation that the password was changed and password definitely gets updated.

Anybody have any ideas on why the password change has a delay if you leave it to complete by itself?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1090377-slow-password-change-on-domain/
Share on other sites

I would start by checking the following:

  • DNS: Can it resolve the domain and all domain controllers? Are the IP addresses correct?
  • Run a diagnostic check for active directory. I can't remember how exactly but dcdiag sounds right.
  • Check event viewer on the domain controller and clients for any clues on related errors.
  • What domain functional level is the forest and domain? May want to raise them to Server 2008 R2 if not already.
  • How is the latency and bandwidth between the DC and client site?

I would start by checking the following:

  • DNS: Can it resolve the domain and all domain controllers? Are the IP addresses correct?
  • Run a diagnostic check for active directory. I can't remember how exactly but dcdiag sounds right.
  • Check event viewer on the domain controller and clients for any clues on related errors.
  • What domain functional level is the forest and domain? May want to raise them to Server 2008 R2 if not already.
  • How is the latency and bandwidth between the DC and client site?

Thanks for the response.

Latency between DC and client is around the 10ms mark average.

PC's can resolve the domain and DNS is correct with the settings being picked up from the server.

No issues found with DCDiag and event logs on server and client are clean with no obvious errors to highlight the cause of the delay.

At the moment my suggestion has been to put a local DC onsite which can then replicate to the VPS DC.

We had similar problems in our remote office. about 200 pc.s there XP SP3 and Windows 7 32/64-bits.

First we tried Slowlink mode and that helped much, but final solution was that we added RODC, now everything works nicly there.

  • 5 months later...

Can I bump this for a revisit for your thoughts please

I'm basically still experiencing the same issues as what I've already highlighted in my previous posts and what this user has posted here -> http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/itprovistanetworking/thread/06dce842-c6dc-4e1f-9f86-7fd7a0a55191

We have implemented a DC locally and there is a DC in a remote site linked via S2S, I've checked the PC logon server and it is the local server, not the remote server. But yet when I try and do a password change. IT JUST TAKES an age...

If there's a firewall between the computers and the DC, I would look at that... Typically dynamic RPC ports allocation. Try to restrict the ports used for RPC by the domain controllers and make sure the now fixed tcp port range is open on the firewall.

Have a look at these KBs

http://bensjibberjabber.wordpress.com/2011/07/26/configuring-domain-controllers-to-use-fixed-rpc-ports-behind-firewalls/

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/832017

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/154596

Something doesn't sound right withy the network setup. Could be active directory, could be Dns, could be replication..... Any event logs on the servers (system, application, security, Dns, replication).

Well AD replication tests out fine, No critical errors in my dcdiag and also dcdiag /test:dns and repadmin /showrepl * /errorsonly comes back clean. I can PM or post the outputs if it will help.

With regars to event logs, apart from some errors that may have been caused when I was changing some of the settings. There is nothing that stick out from the server end. Once again, I'm happy to get this posted if it will help. From the client (workstation) side, everything event wise is so clean, I wish something was erroring out.. :(

If there's a firewall between the computers and the DC, I would look at that... Typically dynamic RPC ports allocation. Try to restrict the ports used for RPC by the domain controllers and make sure the now fixed tcp port range is open on the firewall.

Have a look at these KBs

http://bensjibberjab...hind-firewalls/

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/832017

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/154596

Well the local DC and workstation are now all within the same network with obviously a firewall protecting that whole network. So don't think if the above will help, but will keep in mind.Windows firewall is disabled.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I don’t get why if I bought the game on the last get I needed to pay $40 to upgrade to the new version in the first place and people who love the game and play a lot would have upgraded already so this is just PR and a chance to grab new players who forgot the game long time ago I think
    • The term "use" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that headline. "Use" can mean opening ChatGPT occasionally to ask for the definition of a word or information about a specific topic. If you frame the question around how many people use it as a daily driver in their work or personal lives, that number is a lot smaller. Those are the people who pay for AI. Nearly everyone else is happy to use it for free, but doesn't see enough value in it to pay for it.
    • No support for Windows Hello!
    • I think you meant the "ntfs3" driver, but yes there have been a lot of fixes for it in this release and previous releases, not 100% sure if the issue you mentioned is fixed though. In any case, the new "ntfs" driver in 7.1 doesn't have that issue (at least, no reports of such have come thru), but your kernel needs to explicitly enable support for the new driver first (like how CachyOS kernel has it), and you need to edit your mount points in /etc/fstab to use "ntfs" instead of the other drivers.
    • Epic Games says Unreal Engine 6 will help developers "build content faster" using AI models by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Epic Games is rolling out the latest major update to Unreal Engine 5 today, and at the same time, the company also dropped some information on the next-generation version of the product, Unreal Engine 6. This was already revealed a few weeks ago alongside the new Rocket League upgrade reveal. The company says it is combining the features of Unreal Engine and Unreal Editor for Fortnite to create this new version of its popular media creation tool. On top of creating entire games, the new engine will also focus on letting developers operate large-scale live service titles more easily, whether by shipping content into their own ecosystems or into Fortnite. The use of large language models is also mentioned here, with Epic saying it will be a core part of the engine. "We see LLMs, generative AI models, and tools like Claude and Codex playing a central role in helping you build content faster while maintaining the creative control you need," adds the company. Here is the rundown of what's new about version 6 of Unreal Engine: With all these changes to the programming model, portability upgrades, and generative AI integration, Epic says the new version of the engine will "change a lot about how games are made." The company aims to ship Unreal Engine 6 into early access in late 2027, with a full release planned for 12-18 months later. Epic Games also dropped a lengthy blog post about the new Unreal Engine 5.8 update for game developers over here. The release is focused on delivering better performance, customization, and streamlined workflows for development teams. This will be the final major update for this version of the engine before Epic switches to focus fully on Unreal Engine 6's early access launch.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      67
    5. 5
      neufuse
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!