Exchange and DDNS? Possible?


Recommended Posts

I'm sure all you get is a DNS address resolved to an IP with any Dynamic DNS service.

The only way I can think is to have an alias such as mx0.example.com which is a CNAME of test.no-ip.org. mx0.example.com will then need to be a record itself. I guess you could also just have test.no-ip.org as your only MX record.

My first thought though would be to test the possibility of receiving and sending on port 25. I would have thought most domestic ISP's will block this communication.

SK[' timestamp=1343722926' post='595047579]

I'm sure all you get is a DNS address resolved to an IP with any Dynamic DNS service.

The only way I can think is to have an alias such as mx0.example.com which is a CNAME of test.no-ip.org.

My first thought though would be to test the possibility of receiving on port 25 and sending. I would have thought most domestic ISP's will block this communication.

well i think there was also a way around this for using a ddns fqdn as a web server from your home rite? i imagine there is something also like this for stmp (port 25, like you comment)

Can't think of a way as every other SMTP server in the world will be expecting to speak to your server on port 25. If your ISP block it then your pretty much stuffed. DynDNS offer some sort of mail feature though.

As I said test the connectivity first before implementing a solution that won't work. I host my three sites on my home network with the same Dynamic IP being used as an alias. It works fine. I know though that port 25 is blocked outbound as there is no mail functionality working. Kinda annoying as I run forums. Still, they are dead ones these days and are only really used for reference.

SK[' timestamp=1343722926' post='595047579]

I'm sure all you get is a DNS address resolved to an IP with any Dynamic DNS service.

The only way I can think is to have an alias such as mx0.example.com which is a CNAME of test.no-ip.org. mx0.example.com will then need to be a record itself. I guess you could also just have test.no-ip.org as your only MX record.

My first thought though would be to test the possibility of receiving and sending on port 25. I would have thought most domestic ISP's will block this communication.

Not all do. Time Warner for example leaves the port open but adds its residential IP blocks to one or more DNS Block lists, so that all mail that comes from them gets marked as spam by receivers who check against said lists.

I'd imagine using something like DDNS probably would cause a similar issue. Though idk.

If what you want to do is accept incoming mail, yeah not too many issues there - get a MX record pointed to where you want to accept mail. That is about it.

Where the problem comes in is sending, as mentioned already -- most of the major players will block you from sending them email from a dynamic IP. Even if not using a block list, do you have a valid PTR for this IP - not going to accept mail from you.

So if what you want to do is send mail to your friend billy on his HOME smtp server, then sure go for it. If what you want to do is send actual production email that your sure is going to get there. Not so much, not to any of the major player domains, or any companies doing any sort of decent filtering.

  • 5 months later...

I run my own exchange server. Receiving emails are OK but sending gives an error. Tested via Exchange Connectivity and its says that no PTR Record available for the IP. Any solution to this?

by the way, I use Zerigo as my Dynamic DNS.

receiving you will be fine, it is always the sending. Many isps have closed out bound port 25 traffic outside of their network when on their dynamic ip network. Many spam filters have excluded dynamic range from being able to get through. How do you get around the world denying you?

The option would be to send through a mail host, you can use your isp mail host, but they may have a sending limit.

receiving you will be fine, it is always the sending. Many isps have closed out bound port 25 traffic outside of their network when on their dynamic ip network. Many spam filters have excluded dynamic range from being able to get through. How do you get around the world denying you?

The option would be to send through a mail host, you can use your isp mail host, but they may have a sending limit.

Using my ISP Mail Host is a great idea. I don't mind if they have sending limit. Do I only require to get the SMTP for the ISP? or what else info is required?

yeah sure there are lots of people that provide FREE email servers for you to send your mail through :rolleyes:

If you want/need to send email - then you have to be ready to show your not some random box on the net sending spam. No business that needs to use email is going to be on a dynamic IP. Your also going to be able to setup a PTR because again your not a on dynamic IP and your ISP provides you the ability to change the name the IP resolves too. Only the owning ISP can do this, arin controls who where netblocks point for dns here in the US, other parts of the world would be other orgs, lacnic, ripe, apnic, afrinic

Shoot more and more companies are giving up on running their own mail and doing it in the cloud themselves - not even running their own email servers any more. Or contract out companies to be the front man to their exchange boxes - where this other network sends and recv the mail, and exchange gets mail from this company, and sends all email through them "smart host"

Here is the thing - running your own email server on a home connection for anything other than a hobby or for you to get mail from to some bs domain that gets a couple of mails a day and sends a few a day through your isp email server is nothing more than an exercise in futility.

More likely than not your prob just going to end up running a spam machine anyway ;)

edit: What version of exchange are you running? Look up how to setup smarthost. Keep in mind that many isp will not allow you to send mail from other than your email address, ie say account is [email protected] -- many will not allow you to send mail through their servers that say the email is from [email protected]

SMTP you will need as well as your account info to be able to authenticate and send mail through. You will need to send mail as this account though...the mail header needs to show this for your recipients to be able to receive mail. Unless they just do a ip check (which may be the case), but if they do any sort of resolve and the ip doesn't match the header host it won't make it through. There is a lot that goes on to verify authenticity of the sender in a spam filter.

edit: What version of exchange are you running? Look up how to setup smarthost. Keep in mind that many isp will not allow you to send mail from other than your email address, ie say account is [email protected] -- many will not allow you to send mail through their servers that say the email is from [email protected]

am using Exchange Server 2013 over Windows server 2008 R2 (which is a DC as well). My ISP is Saudi Net (worst ISP in the entire middle east with no support at all). Cant even request for PTR. Tried the SMTP for them but still not working, maybe am not configuring Exchange Server properly.

SMTP you will need as well as your account info to be able to authenticate and send mail through. You will need to send mail as this account though...the mail header needs to show this for your recipients to be able to receive mail. Unless they just do a ip check (which may be the case), but if they do any sort of resolve and the ip doesn't match the header host it won't make it through. There is a lot that goes on to verify authenticity of the sender in a spam filter.

I tried tons of ways but none work. Web Server was way easy configuring compared to exchange server :/

"Cant even request for PTR."

I don't know of any ISP that would setup PTR of a dynamic IP other than the generic ones you get.. For example

;; QUESTION SECTION:

;xx.xx.13.24.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR

;; ANSWER SECTION:

xx.xx.13.24.in-addr.arpa. 7200 IN PTR c-24-13-xx-xx.hsd1.il.comcast.net.

Now such a PTR might meet some filtering some domains do in the sense that it exists.. Others might reject it because its not a true reflection of the forward name.. So for example if your mail server IP is resolved via smtp.somedomain.tld, they might like the PTR of the IP that resolves to to reflect the same smtp.somedomain.tld

As I already mentioned, some ISPs won't allow their smtp servers to send mail for anything other than the account holder email address. So if your email address with your isp is [email protected] and your trying to send email from [email protected] - even if you auth with your specific account info, their server might tell you to get lost since the email address is not valid for that account.

Many ISPs don't even allow outbound on 25 from their dynamic client networks, nor allow their smtp server to send email for any other email address then what is listed on the specific account - this is to help reduce spam being sent from their network. If you have such restrictions then your only solution is to pay for a smarthost that allows you to send mail they forward on your behalf on a different port, etc. The dyndns company already mentioned provides such solutions. If you not willing to pay for such services - how are you affording exchange? ;)

If you not willing to pay for such services - how are you affording exchange? ;)

I can afford all the services, but I wanted to setup it for free at all. By the way, setting up all this was a part of my exercise. Wanted to learn about the Web hosting, Domain Controller, Email exchange. All was setup properly except this Exchange. I tried adding the PTR host in Zerigo (my Dynamic DNS service) it was done but my ISP really need to assign me a PTR record to my IP (which seems not possible for Dynamic IP Users). How about if I search for some free SmartHost providers before paying for something :rofl:

Edit: by the way, I get free license for Microsoft Products :D so trying all of them is not that bad :rolleyes:

Your not going to find a FREE smart host.. Not that I can think of - I don't even think google apps when it was free for your domains allowed that?

What would the smarthost get out of it? Other than prob blacklisted because you were using them to send spam ;)

You can study the setup of exchange without really having to send mail to all the major players.. Does your isp allow outbound of their network on 25? Simple enough to test, try connecting to a smtp server somewhere?

Cheap way you could do it is get yourself a VPS somewhere... I have a vps for $15 a year that would be more than capable of sending email for me, etc. And I can setup the PTR on the IP the host gave me. So it can be done for very cheap.

But again if all your doing is playing/learning does not matter if the major players will block you.. there are plenty of domains you can send to for testing that wont filter you.

So telnet to a smtp server on 25, can you connect - if so then your isp allows you to send outbound on 25 and could setup exchange to directly send.. Just some of the major players are not going to accept mail from you.

budman@ubuntu:~$ telnet mailin-01.mx.aol.com 25

Trying 205.188.159.42...

Connected to mailin-01.mx.aol.com.

Escape character is '^]'.

554- (RTR:DU) http://postmaster.info.aol.com/errors/554rtrdu.html

554 Connecting IP: 24.13.xx.xx

Connection closed by foreign host.

so you see my ISP allows me outbound on 25, but mail server for AOL told me to get lost ;) Because

54 RTR:DU[/url]

Cheap way you could do it is get yourself a VPS somewhere... I have a vps for $15 a year that would be more than capable of sending email for me, etc. And I can setup the PTR on the IP the host gave me. So it can be done for very cheap.

Where? can I get that too?

Will post the telnet results once I get the exact SMTP for the ISP :wacko:

smtp for the isp? Just do a dns look for any smtp server for any domain. Use aol for an example

As to a vps -- here are some listings of cheap ones

http://www.lowendbox.com/

http://lowendstock.com/

Mine is with http://buyvm.net/

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ooooh! Two editorial from Paul Hill on the same day! Is it my birthday or something? 😉 Okay, let's see if I get it right. SearXNG develops a meta-search engine app. Individuals install it on their relays. Users connect to these relays to have their own identity-stripping meta-search engine instead of relying on DuckDuckGo. And some of these volunteers have listed their SearXNG instances on SearX.space. That was a lot of wrap my head around. I hope I haven't missed anything.
    • You sound like some Ukrainians in Crimea before 2014: "I didn't vote for USSR disbanding - I want Ukraine to be part of Russia again" 🤣
    • Uninstalr 3.1 by Razvan Serea Introducing Uninstalr: Easy to use and very accurate software uninstaller for Windows. It can uninstall multiple apps at the same time and we think it’s pretty cool. Developed with expertise by Macecraft Software - the minds behind jv16 PowerTools. Key Features Batch uninstall many apps at the same time. Supports unattended uninstallation of apps. Supports monitoring of new software installations. Also detects portable apps and previously uninstalled software leftovers. Shows all the data added to your system by installed software on a file by file basis. Shows all the data it will remove before starting the uninstallation. Filter and search the list of installed software. According to our benchmark, Uninstalr is the most accurate software uninstaller by leaving the least amount of leftovers when uninstalling apps. Supports detection and uninstallation of Microsoft Store, Steam, Big Fish Game System, Chocolatey, NuGet and Ninite installed software. Supports Windows Dark Mode. Supports Windows 11, 10, 8 and 7. Comes with these translations builtin: Chinese Simplified, Chinese Traditional, Czech, Danish, English, Filipino, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hindi, Hungarian, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Malay, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Spanish, Swedish, Thai, Turkish, Ukrainian and Vietnamese. Has a single executable file portable version and a normal setup version. Uninstalr is freeware, lightweight and easy to use. No bells and whistles, no nonsense. Uninstalr’s custom uninstallation engine has a dedicated support for the detection and uninstallation of 15 types of apps: Normal Windows apps Microsoft Store apps Portable apps Chocolatey apps Ninite apps PortableApps.com apps Steam games EA App games Epic Games Store games Riot platform games GOG Galaxy games WarGaming.net games Battle.net games itch.io games Big Fish platform games Uninstalr 3.1 changelog: Key Changes Uninstalr now starts and shows the list of installed apps faster after the initial scan has been completed, and with much smaller memory usage. Uninstalr now detects and highlights apps that automatically start with Windows. Greatly improved the detection of portable apps. Improvements New feature: Uninstalr now detects and highlights apps that automatically start with Windows. New feature: Uninstalr now highlights possible leftovers and apps from Russia and China. This can be disabled from the Settings. New feature: A new filter that allows you to show only software that is installed to other than the system drive. New feature: Users can now select to always do the deepest and the most accurate scan for installed apps, at the cost of the analysis taking a longer time. Greatly improved the detection of portable apps, such as added dedicated support for MiTeC, EZ Tools and SysInternals tools. Improved support for portable apps installed via Windows System Control Center (WSCC). NirSoft portable apps are now listed with "NirSoft" prefix for easier identification. Improved the speed of uninstalling apps. The main installed software listing search will now find "Xbox GameBar" if you search for "Game bar" and vice versa. The tooltip now displays more detailed information of the installed apps, such as its registry key and uninstaller path. The links in the About section now look more like clickable links. The main menu is now more clearly indicated in the main user interface. Microsoft Teams Meeting Add-in for Microsoft Office ships with some Windows 11 installations and is now considered a builtin Windows app and only listed if builtin Windows apps filter is enabled. Added a Help button to the main user interface that opens the help section of the website. Added an option not to close Uninstalr after uninstallation. If you open the Uninstalr website from the app, the website now receives the version number of your current Uninstalr version and warns you if you are using anything but the latest version. Improved the accuracy of the New Software Monitor. Improved confirmation messages for Steam and other platform related uninstalls. Improved the uninstallation performance of Steam games. Fixes: Known bug fixed: Some installed app names are capitalized incorrectly, such as "CCleaner Portable" is listed as "ccleaner portable". Known bug fixed: Some apps can be listed twice, for example, Smart Defrag can be listed once as Smart Defrag and then Smart Defrag Home. Known bug fixed: On the pre-uninstallation screen, the Scripts checkbox can be checked by default on Dark Mode but not on the normal mode. Known bug fixed: Perform Deep Analysis can be started only by clicking the button, not via the Right Click menu, main menu or F4 keyboard shortcut. Muse Hub could be incorrectly listed as Adobe Muse. SyncTrayzor was incorrectly detected as two unrelated software, SyncTrayzor and Syncthing. Smart Defrag was incorrectly listed twice as Smart Defrag 11 and Smart Defrag Home. It was possible to enter non-printable characters to the search input boxes of the main screen, and the path listing screen, which caused the UI to look funny. Changing the translation from Settings, especially many times in a row, caused the UI to distort. If you had multiple instances of portable apps on your system, such as the 64b and 32b versions of the same portable app, typically only one of them was detected, not both. In some very rare cases, Uninstalr UI could start with random characters in its search input boxes, which could make the UI look rather confusing. This was a rare issue, only reported by two users. The pre-uninstallation screen could display non-existing paths for example as the software's installation directory or main exe file. This was a cosmetic issue. New Software Monitor cannot detect the installation of Claude. Selecting all the found software made the UI look funny with the top panel covering everything else (because the names of all the selected software were listed there). Sometimes a Steam game could be listed a normal app instead of a Steam game. If the system restart after an uninstallation is delayed, e.g. because of Windows Updates being installed, this additional delay is incorrectly added to the time how long the uninstallation process took. This cosmetic bug could cause the program incorrectly report an uninstallation time longer than the actual uninstallation time. Uninstalling Minecraft could simply fail. The Only scan the system drive for installed apps setting does not fully work. If some apps are installed to a non system drive and this setting is enabled, the app could still be detected and listed on the main user interface. Changing any settings could also incorrectly alter the Only Scan The System Drive For Installed Apps setting. Microsoft OneDrive and Copilot are not always detected. If you enter something to the search filter field, then select the text and press the Delete key, this triggers the Uninstall button click even if your intent was to delete the text input. If you press the F5 key to refresh the screen during the uninstallation loading screen, the program will crash. If you enabled some setting, such as "Do not analyze installed app installation sizes", it could automatically be unchecked later. Uninstalr doesn't warn you if you try to remove Fortec antivirus. There should be a warning if user attempts to remove any antivirus or antimalware type program. Such programs should not be uninstalled using a third party uninstaller, as they are typically protected against automated uninstallation, for security reasons. With "Do not analyze installed app installation sizes" option checked from the Settings, Uninstalr could still display some installation size related elements in the UI which was confusing. The "Only scan the system drive" option moved under Improve Scan Speed from the General settings. If two software have the exact same name and version number, selecting both of them for uninstallation fails because only one is actually selected. Sorting the installed apps by size sometimes fails and the order is incorrect. The "Don't show which paths are currently analyzed" did not work correctly - some parts of the UI still show the currently analyzed path with this setting checked. The "Don't list software less than 10 MB" filter did not work correctly - some apps smaller than 10 MB could still be listed. Uninstalr could start very quickly and display an empty list of detected apps. Restarting the app usually fixed the issue and the list of installed apps was properly displayed. If you placed portable Uninstalr to a same folder with other portable apps, those were not detected because Uninstalr automatically added its installation folder to the ignore list. When trying to uninstall some specific software, Uninstalr could get stuck on the Searching for more data relating to the app phase. Uninstalr could sometimes do a silent uninstallation even if user had unchecked the Perform a silent uninstallation option. Known issues: Uninstalr can fail to run with an Out Of Memory error in systems that have a lot of installed apps. Using the New Software Monitor tool multiple times during one session can cause the program to get stuck on the Scanning stage. The "uninstallation completed" message box sometimes closes when the user moves the mouse cursor over the button before user clicks it. There is no feedback for the user after Fix Information feature has been used. The Right Click menu's Select by publisher option can display the number of apps per each publisher without correct vertical alignment. The default user interface might not display all of the found installed apps if you have over 600 installed apps. If you do, using the Screen Reader Compatible Interface solves the issue. Leftover apptype filter checkbox is shown in red font only in Dark Mode. Clicking the app's icon from the Windows Taskbar doesn't minimize/restore the app like other apps. The warning about an app that user wishes to uninstall being related to some other app user did not select can sometimes be inaccurate. If app's language is changed without restarting Uninstalr, the list of installed software might not automatically refresh. When software is being uninstalled, the UI can say it is processing paths unrelating to the uninstalled app. This is purely cosmetic and does not mean these paths are removed. Uninstalr might not properly detect and/or uninstall Steam games if they are installed to a drive different than Steam's default location in C:\. You might see "This action is only valid for products that are currently installed" error message from Windows Installer during uninstallation. This is a cosmetic issue. Download: Uninstalr 3.1 | 7.1 MB (Free, paid version available) Download: Uninstalr Setup 3.1 View: Uninstalr Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I and many others did not vote to get out of the E.u because of Putin or Farage, we did so for our own reasons. You don't have to tel me what my own did or did not do when it comes to the E.U. The EEC is or was the European Economic Community, a different beast to what the E.U is now.The EEC was a mainly about trading, the E.U have gone far beyond that and as I have said before, is now more of a United States of Europe. The U.K did not vote to join a United States of Europe. Anyway, they did not want us in there in the first place, Charles de Gaulle stopped us joining as he claimed we didn’t agree with the core ideas of integration. He was not wrong and that is why we voted out of the E.U when the time came. I was not old enough to vote the first time. My only regret is that we did not have the referendum years ago and got out years ago. If we rejoined, we would have to agree to join the Euro and no doubt Schengen, agree with freedom of movement, we have enough problem with people coming over here as it is. i have no problem with people coming over here if they work and don't try to push their way of life onto us. The E.U has a currency, freedom of movement, an anthem a flag, a parliament, well they are there, not sure if they do anything. Don't sound like something that is just for trading. Oh yeah, also wanted a euro Army. How many stupid rules have the E.U made that we had to follow? I doubt I will see the Uk rejoin the E.U, which suits me. Oh yeah, my partner is Polish, she came over here before Poland joined the E.U and she got fed up of people just coming over here with ease, while she had to struggle. She is now a British citizen and have been for a fair few years
    • Hello, Paul. Thanks for the editorial. It was interesting. I'm going research more into the app and its concept. Of course, if you know me at all, you know that I'd say your articles needs some editing! I always do, don't I? For instance, the article occasionally mentions relays before defining it.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!