Which Linux distribution to choose for work and programming?


Recommended Posts

Hello. So, I decided to change my main OS (with Win 7 dual boot) to one of Linux distributions but I really don't know which one. My main goal is to have convenient desktop enviroment for working and programming (dual screen) but as lightweight as possible. I don't need any special effects, I just need simple and comfortable desktop enviroment. I have some experience with Ubuntu but not very much, I know basic things.

I have Asus N53SM laptop with these specifications:

15.6-inch glossy 720p display (1366x768 resolution)t

Intel Core i7-2670QM quad-core processor (2.2GHz, up to 3.1GHz Turbo Boost, 6MB cache, 45W TDP)

Nvidia GeForce GT 630M graphics card w/ 2GB memory

4GB DDR3-1333 RAM (max. supported)

500GB 7200RPM hard drive + Westen Digital 1TB 3.5" External HDD

Atheros AR9002WB-1NG

Integrated Bluetooth wireless

Integrated 720p webcam

Internal tray-load DVD burner (DS8A8SH)

6-cell li-ion battery (56Whr, 5200mAh)

I assume any of the major ones could be configured to be a development environment, but to answer your question, I read somewhere that Linus Torvalds himself said Fedora is ideal for development work. Perhaps you could try that?

Do you want a stable working environment or bleeding edge software?

For a stable working environment I would suggest Debian 6.0 or CentOS. Maybe Ubuntu 12.04 if you enjoy the Unity desktop.

If you want bleeding edge software, install Fedora or Arch.

Do you want a stable working environment or bleeding edge software?

For a stable working environment I would suggest Debian 6.0 or CentOS. Maybe Ubuntu 12.04 if you enjoy the Unity desktop.

If you want bleeding edge software, install Fedora or Arch.

It doesn't matter really. I were thinking about Arch now. It has one of the best documentations that I've ever seen and you can configure a lot, so it can be everything - with lots of effects or simple ant lightweight. I think it should be a great experience with Linux. It's hard to choose really.

Let's say that I'll stay with Arch. What about desktop enviroment? LXDE, XFCE, Gnome? What's the difference of them in performance?

I know this is off the topic but. I would like to ask what programming language you are going to use?

Python, later Java maybe.

For general use I use Arch for it's lightness and configurability. For development though I always found Fedora to be a great distro. It's tooled up to the eyeballs and bleeding edge too so you can always develop with the latest stuff.

EDIT:

Let's say that I'll stay with Arch. What about desktop enviroment? LXDE, XFCE, Gnome? What's the difference of them in performance?

Personally I'm an XFCE guy, always have been. Very customizable, and very lightweight too. It doesn't have many dependencies and in general I find that it just stays out of the way when I'm working. I find Gnome to be too bloated (although my experience with Gnome 3 is limited), and KDE to be (still) ugly as sin. LXDE I haven't tried, but I've heard good things.

For the past couple days (mostly for the Shift2) I've been running with Arch. I have Cinnamon installed as the DE and have Mono installed. Runs great, I have broken it a couple times, but that's just in noobiness to linux as a whole.

For general use I use Arch for it's lightness and configurability. For development though I always found Fedora to be a great distro. It's tooled up to the eyeballs and bleeding edge too so you can always develop with the latest stuff.

EDIT:

Personally I'm an XFCE guy, always have been. Very customizable, and very lightweight too. It doesn't have many dependencies and in general I find that it just stays out of the way when I'm working. I find Gnome to be too bloated (although my experience with Gnome 3 is limited), and KDE to be (still) ugly as sin. LXDE I haven't tried, but I've heard good things.

Thanks for the info. I think I'll try to install Arch with XFCE now.

As far as desktop environments go - there is no objective best one. Try them out and find the one you like the most.

Oh and: Welcome to Neowin.

Thanks, it's an awesome forum with great community!

And by the way, if I'll have some questions about Arch, should I change name of topic or just create a new one?

I would suggest starting a new topic if you run into any issues with installing Arch.

That and make have the Arch Wiki up on another system if you're new to it, for the most part it holds your hand through the installation process. (And is a great reference overall for this distro.) The install is pretty straightforward but if you're new to the *Nix thing in general it can be a bit daunting.. not as friendly as something like the 'Buntu's.

For general use I use Arch for it's lightness and configurability. For development though I always found Fedora to be a great distro. It's tooled up to the eyeballs and bleeding edge too so you can always develop with the latest stuff.

EDIT:

Personally I'm an XFCE guy, always have been. Very customizable, and very lightweight too. It doesn't have many dependencies and in general I find that it just stays out of the way when I'm working. I find Gnome to be too bloated (although my experience with Gnome 3 is limited), and KDE to be (still) ugly as sin. LXDE I haven't tried, but I've heard good things.

Yes,

XFCE all the way, if you want lite!! Which makes Xubuntu the best option if you want to use that junk Ubuntu!

Personally,

I don't like it. Ubuntu, that is.

Linux Arch or Mint, would probably be best suited for you.

I like Zenwalk myself (Slackware based) Most of the stuff you usually have to find on the side like flash and zip and codecs, is already included in the software.

http://www.zenwalk.org/

I would suggest Linux Mint KDE 13. Unlike the other major windows managers like gnome and unity, KDE still focuses on being a productive environment.

It is a good enviroment, but he's looking for lightweight, and KDE 4 is anything but.

To be honest, any GNU/Linux distro is good for programming, but my personal preference is Arch Linux. Mostly for the same reasons as you, it's lightweight because you get to choose exactly what runs on it (/etc/rc.conf), and the repositories (AUR) are second to none, except perhaps Gentoo, which is also very good.

I code in C, Java (Android), and Python mostly, and GNU/Linux is a programmer's dream. However, I also like to experiment with bash, perl, vala, and pretty much any new toy that catches my eye :D

LiveCD them all and see which one annoys you the least. That's how I always picked a distro. Or VM them, or for some (Ubuntu), run them straight from Windows.

That's the nice thing about Linux, it's almost always free, and it plays nicely with other operating systems, even if they don't always want to play nice with Linux.

Another thing that might be of interest (to everyone really) is how easy it is to compile repository software so that it's optimised for your system's CPU architecture. Gentoo (almost everything is compiled) and Arch (/etc/makepkg.conf) have that really sewn up. For most applications, it's not a problem, but there are a few that really benefit from targeted compilation.

As far as a DE goes, there are a few good lightweight ones. It all depends where on the scale you want to be. Tiling window managers are much more barebones for instance, but XFCE is a full desktop environment that's also quite frugal with resources. MATE (Gnome 2 Fork) is also a good choice.

Sometimes I like to do all my stuff just from the raw terminal. Using the framebuffer for playing video and games, and ncurses for webbrowsing and music player. GCC/GDB is already cli, so that's not a problem.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Meta will now use data from outside businesses to personalize AI responses by David Uzondu In an update that's rolling out globally (except in a handful of countries), Meta will use your data from outside businesses to personalize your AI responses and your primary feeds. Meta already utilizes your shopping activity to target ads, but the company now plans to expand this tracking to personalize other "parts of your experience" like feed algorithms and AI assistant chats. The company is replacing the two settings ("Your activity off Meta technologies" and "Activity from other businesses") that currently let you disconnect off-platform activity with a single, renamed setting called Activity from other businesses. If you don't want Meta to manipulate your feed and AI responses using your outside history, you can just turn the Activity from other businesses setting off in your account settings. This toggle resides within your Accounts Center, applying your choice to every connected profile. Turning this off will not stop companies from sending your data to Meta. The company will still collect your web interactions, but it only uses them to train products, while still accessing external accounts you connect. When The Verge spoke to Meta spokesperson, Emil Vazquez, the representative said that this update will exclude several locations at launch including the European region, the UK, Brazil, Thailand, South Africa, Turkey, South Korea, Ecuador, Nigeria, and Kenya. The new update comes at a time when the social media giant is recovering from a major PR disaster involving generative AI. Last week, there was a huge security issue on Instagram where attackers figured out a way to exploit a prompt injection vulnerability. Hackers managed to trick Meta AI into handing over account ownership (even if the victim had 2FA enabled). Some of the affected accounts include the dormant Obama White House profile, cosmetics brand Sephora, the Chief Master Sergeant of the Space Force, and security researcher Jane Manchun Wong. Internally, the company also had to scale back plans on its Model Capability Initiative (MCI), an employee-monitoring program designed to train corporate AI models by recording worker keystrokes and screen activity, after employees raised privacy concerns and complained about severe battery life drain.
    • JetBrains is working to cut false positives in RustRover 2026.2 by David Uzondu Recently, JetBrains released the fifth EAP build of its dedicated IDE, RustRover 2026.2, bringing improvements like a Run gutter icon for criterion_main! macro benchmarking and a feature that alerts you when there are unused traits in your current scope. Now, the company is out with a blog post addressing one of the "most common" complaints from users: false positives. In RustRover, a false positive occurs when the editor incorrectly highlights something as an error even though the project compiles and runs successfully. This mismatch flags a gap between the IDE's internal intelligence and the actual compiler. When the editor flashes red warnings over perfectly valid code, developers lose trust in the tool, which stalls momentum. Traditionally, RustRover runs cargo check to detect compiler errors and warnings, but it also relies on its own code analysis engine to power real-time features. To provide quick feedback, this engine parses your source code into a syntax tree while inferring types and resolving names as you type. Because this engine must work on broken, half-written code and react instantly, its logic sometimes diverges from the compiler's, producing false positives that do not exist in the compiler's eyes. JetBrains said that it has a "dedicated task force" focused specifically on identifying and fixing false positives by analyzing user reports and examining large-scale open-source projects. To speed up this process, the team built an internal system modeled after Crater, the famous Rust project that compiles and runs tests for every single crate published on crates.io. This automated pipeline compares the diagnostics from RustRover's analysis with actual compiler output to catch discrepancies before they reach users, ensuring smoother workflows. RustRover, for those who're unaware, is a dedicated IDE designed specifically for Rust developers. It's been around for a couple of years now, providing features like built-in debugging via LLDB, seamless cargo integration, advanced macro expansion, and HTML support. JetBrains distributes the app under two licensing models: a paid commercial subscription and a free option for non-commercial use.
    • Last year I bought the 2TB variant for $114 on Amazon. That's crazy that the 1TB is now 67% more expensive for half the storage, even with the newer T9 already on the market. And that's considered a good deal.
    • You can disable all non needed features from Brave. There is also Brave Origin which removes them entirely and it is free for Linux.
    • I wish I could use Brave but the tab suspension feature is horrible. It doesn't suspend them like Edge does. Even after 2h open with 70+ tabs (same as Edge), it has 2GB more consumption than Edge for no reason.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Primer1st earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Experienced
      JayZJay went up a rank
      Experienced
    • Reacting Well
      Sir_Timbit earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      Edouard
      135
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!