Recommended Posts

Pixelmator Adds Support for OS X Mountain Lion

Major Update Adds iCloud Support, Effects Browser, Vintage and Miniaturize Effects and Smart Alignment Guides

The Pixelmator Team today released a major update of Pixelmator, its inspiring, easy-to-use and feature-packed image editing software for the Mac. Designed to take full advantage of OS X Mountain Lion and the new MacBook Pro with Retina display, Pixelmator 2.1 adds support for iCloud, a new Effects Browser with new Vintage and Miniaturize effects, smart Alignment Guides and several other enhancements.

http://www.pixelmato...-mountain-lion/

What's New in Version 2.1

Pixelmator 2.1 is a major update introducing several new features and improvements, including the following:

? Retina-Ready: Both Pixelmator?s friendly user interface and its powerful image editing engine are now optimized for the Retina display.

? iCloud: Built right into the app and keeps your Pixelmator work up to date across all your Macs.

? Effects Browser: The best and the most fun way to browse: instantly preview and quickly apply special effects or add color adjustments to images.

? New Effects: Use the new Vintage, Miniaturize, Black and White, Rain, and Snow effects.

? Alignment Guides: Quickly position, align, and evenly distribute objects in your Pixelmator compositions with pinpoint accuracy.

? OS X Mountain Lion Support: Pixelmator takes full advantage of all the latest and greatest technologies.

? And much more.

Pixelmator can be bought for ?11,99 (US $14.99) in the App Store.

post-128385-0-66535300-1344516127_thumb.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1097239-pixelmater-21-cherry/
Share on other sites

On a personal note: Since Pixelmator was dropped in price to ?12 for a limited time only I really couldn't resist the temptation. It's an amazing app with a team who seem to be highly dedicated to improving it. For most people Pixelmater most likely offers more than enough. Beyond that it's fast, has a great interface and it actually makes use of what OS X has to offer. Very much unlike Adobe's apps.

I highly recommend Pixelmator to those who need an image editor with some more advanced features, but for whom Adobe Photoshop is overkill or way too expensive.

I love Pixelmator. I don't need anything powerful, I just want a down to earth app where all the tools are presented right in front of you. For ?12 it's difficult to think of anything I've got better value for money out of.

EDIT: turns out I paid ?10.49 for it. Even better. I don't know when it was $59 then O_o

On a personal note: Since Pixelmator was dropped in price to ?12 for a limited time only I really couldn't resist the temptation. It's an amazing app with a team who seem to be highly dedicated to improving it. For most people the app most likely offers more than enough. Beyond that it's fast, has a great interface and it actually makes use of what OS X has to offer. Very much unlike Adobe's apps.

I highly recommend Pixelmator to those who need an image editor with some more advanced features, but for whom Adobe Photoshop is overkill or way too expensive.

I recommend it too, I bought it when the price dropped, it is a brilliant image editor and its what I call the Paint.NET for OS X, probably better! Love this app!

I like Pixelmator, but I wish they'd add an option to lighten up the toolbar/floating panels. I find them pretty jarring.

Email them about it. I did too and posted a comment on their blog. The more people complain about it, the better.

If you'd could also casually bring up the support of multi-touch gestures for trackpads I'd be very grateful. :p

Pixelmator is awesome and I do recommend it. However, it has a few annoyances, which become bigger as you use it :

- The all-black interface

- The lack of Layer Styles (even after so many requests, even after over 3 years !!!!!!)

- Should be a single-window-app or windows should be dockable and same size

I wrote it just about everywhere on their site about the dark interface, they won?t listen. I?m not the only one to complain. Maybe each one of us that finds it hard on the eyes should complain, too ? Hell, even their website is so dark that it doesn?t encourage us to even leave a message.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      213
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!