Help with things to move from Firefox to Chrome


Recommended Posts

So, guys, I think I'll give Chrome another try. I'm in Frefox now, and it's great, but the performance of Chrome always gets me. The thing is that many things are missing for me. Maybe you could help me?

Aero Peek

So, I always stay between 5-8 tabs, so Aero Peek works like a charm for me. There was a code to put on the shortcut, but Google removed that. (--aero-peek-tabs, I think). Is there a way to get it back? If not, I could live with that. But since I always change tabs and windows, it could be great for me.

Extensions

So, almost all extensions that I use are in Chrome as well. But Ghostery behaves so differently that it's almost impossible to white-list the things I don't want blocked. Now, there is Do Not Track Plus, which I never tried. Does it work better? Also, does it blend well with Adblock?

Rendering problems

On Lifehacker (and all Gawker sites, apparently), there's a gray line in the middle of the articles only on Chrome. I've seen that on the search function of Facebook's chat and the guys on Rock, Paper, Shotgun saw that this week as well. Is there a fix for that?

Alright, so I managed to get around all of these problems, execpt Aero Peek, but I can live with that. There's only one more thing: With Flashblock, even if I put video sites on the white-list, embed videos still don't work. I'm talking about YouTube and Vimeo. Do I have to put specific adresses?

EDIT: I restarted it, and it's working. Nevermind!

You actually don't need the flashblock extension. The functionality is built into Chrome.

You can find it under

Settings > Advanced Settings > Privacy > Content Settings > Scroll down to find the Plugin section > Enable Click to Play

You can also click on Manage Exceptions to add your whitelist.

You actually don't need the flashblock extension. The functionality is built into Chrome.

You can find it under

Settings > Advanced Settings > Privacy > Content Settings > Scroll down to find the Plugin section > Enable Click to Play

You can also click on Manage Exceptions to add your whitelist.

Click to play could also be enabled in Firefox as well, but it has the same problem of making whitelisting a real hassle because it has to be done manually every time by going deep into the settings to do it. For that reason, Flashblock is still preferable.

Edit... So it seems like Chrome recently added a newer "site permissions" control panel by clicking the favicon next to the web address in the omnibar. So once you have click to play enabled, all you have to do to whitelist the site is click the favicon and then change the plugin settings from "ask by default" to "always allow". It's an extra couple of clicks, but reduces the browser memory load of having one less extension running.

Click to play could also be enabled in Firefox as well, but it has the same problem of making whitelisting a real hassle because it has to be done manually every time by going deep into the settings to do it. For that reason, Flashblock is still preferable.

Edit... So it seems like Chrome recently added a newer "site permissions" control panel by clicking the favicon next to the web address in the omnibar. So once you have click to play enabled, all you have to do to whitelist the site is click the favicon and then change the plugin settings from "ask by default" to "always allow". It's an extra couple of clicks, but reduces the browser memory load of having one less extension running.

Yes, the new site permissions menu is a nice addition. But actually, adding a site to your whitelist has always been pretty easy.

When Chrome blocks plugins on a site, it tells you so with a puzzle piece looking icon at the far right end of the omnibar (see below). All you ever had to do was click that and you could whitelist your site from there.

nll5L.jpg

Yes, the new site permissions menu is a nice addition. But actually, adding a site to your whitelist has always been pretty easy.

When Chrome blocks plugins on a site, it tells you so with a puzzle piece looking icon at the far right end of the omnibar (see below). All you ever had to do was click that and you could whitelist your site from there.

nll5L.jpg

Yeah, I've been using it for the past few days and noticed that icon as well.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • If I could, I would commemorate it the best way possible: Replacing old machines that are still running Windows XP with something more modern, stable and better.     Noone and nothing should be running Windows XP in 2026.
    • Google's new hand-wave reCAPTCHA can be bypassed with a stock photo by Ivan Jenic Image: Screenshot Google is testing a new reCAPTCHA method that asks you to wave at your camera to prove you're human. So, besides solving puzzles and reading distorted text, you can now use your computer’s camera to pass the verification test. When the hand gesture verification is triggered, your browser asks for camera access and prompts you to perform a simple gesture, like a wave or an open palm. Google says it records a short video of the movement and uses AI to extract 21 hand-knuckle coordinates to complete the verification process. The video is then immediately deleted, and Google swears it doesn't keep it. The process alone can be uncomfortable for people who wouldn’t want their biometric data, which hand scans technically qualify as, recorded. But it gets even more nuanced, as early testers discovered that the new hand-waving reCAPTCHA can be passed with a simple stock image. A user on X tested the new challenge using a stock image of a hand fed through OBS Virtual Camera, and it passed. I wanted to verify it, so I tried the same thing. It took me a few tries and a few stock images, but in the end, I was also able to pass the test. I simply had to readjust the stock image of a generic person waving inside OBS, and Google’s mechanism registered it as a legitimate hand gesture. Once again, it didn’t even have to be a video or an AI-generated hand animation. Given the simplicity of the process, the entire action can be automated in minutes. All it takes is a simple Python script to render the new reCAPTCHA method obsolete. And it doesn’t even have to be an AI bot, which is usually used for solving puzzles and other verification methods. The new reCAPTCHA method is still in its early phase, and Google will, hopefully, update its AI to at least reject still images. However, this incident, combined with users’ initial skepticism about Google’s practices regarding user data, likely won’t make too many people wave at the camera anytime soon.
    • 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 "to fund healthcare and tuition" 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Who do you think you are talking about, some COMMUNIST? We are better than them, doG bless Murica!!! p.s. I'm from a country where government does exactly that, i.e. not form US.
    • Apparently not. I know it is on Edge for business at the moment, but how long will it be before it become on the home version of Edge?
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Apprentice
      Asgardi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      255
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      90
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!