Bitcoin Mining, anyone doing it ?


Recommended Posts

Never even heard of Bitcoin Mining until about a week ago, so today I've installed a client and am currently waiting for it to finish synchronising blocks or something.

Anyone involved in this and know what its all about ?

The only thing I understand is that Bitcoins are a type of interwebz currency that can be used to either buy stuff from certain sites or transfer into real money

Is it worth it?

What sort of turnover can you make with a couple of 6850s mining about 16 hours a day ? (Will they pay for the amount of electric I will use running them ? )

How do you get 2 GPUs to work at the same time for the same account, run 2 x clients ? (Still waiting on it syncing so haven't got that far yet)

How much are bitcoins worth in ? and are there any decent sites you can use bitcoins to buy decent stuff ?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1103973-bitcoin-mining-anyone-doing-it/
Share on other sites

I did it for a little while when it first hit notoriety and the first GPU clients came out. But now days you will spend more money in electricity generating the coins than the coins themselves are worth so unless you have some way to get electricity for free or very very cheaply it's just not worth doing it. You can make more money from bitcoins by simply buying when they are low and selling when they are high but that is obviously a gamble.

The whole bitcoin thing reminds me of this episode of seinfeld where Newman and Kramer find a way to use Newmans mail truck as a way to deliver empty bottles to a michigan bottle bank that pays 10 cents per empty bottle while their own state of new york only pays 5 cents. It's a similar situation with bitcoining, if you can find a way to get the electricity cheaply or free then you can make money just like the free truck lowered their costs enough to make the bottle bank 10 cent payout profitable.

Your only just finding out about it really? Its actually grabbed some headlines over the past year or so. Head over to /. they love storys on it. Anyway I started in the early days but its not cost effective now at all.

Yea I'd never heard of it until someone was asking why CFX was not working for mining, so I went to investigate what it was :)

I did it for a little while when it first hit notoriety and the first GPU clients came out. But now days you will spend more money in electricity generating the coins than the coins themselves are worth so unless you have some way to get electricity for free or very very cheaply it's just not worth doing it. You can make more money from bitcoins by simply buying when they are low and selling when they are high but that is obviously a gamble.

The whole bitcoin thing reminds me of this episode of seinfeld where Newman and Kramer find a way to use Newmans mail truck as a way to deliver empty bottles to a michigan bottle bank that pays 10 cents per empty bottle while their own state of new york only pays 5 cents. It's a similar situation with bitcoining, if you can find a way to get the electricity cheaply or free then you can make money just like the free truck lowered their costs enough to make the bottle bank 10 cent payout profitable.

That's what I thought, running the GPUs will cost more than I'm generating

Ah well, was something to keep me occupied for a few minutes :p

Unless you're willing to put some money in FPGAs or ASICs its not worth it. Bitcoin has moved past GPU.

http://bitcoinfpga.com/

There is also this one: http://www.butterflylabs.com/products/

I've seen people on bitcoin forums talking about this quite a lot. And I agree completely the days of GPU mining are long gone the power consumption is just so much higher than these dedicated ASIC's that theres just no question which way to go if you're serious about mining coins. For me I'm not serious enough about it to invest in any kind of dedicated hardware. I just don't believe in bitcoins yet especially with the huge fluctuations in price from one month to the next combined with the ability for coin horders to wildly influence price in an instant by dumping or buying lots of coins. It's just too .. unstable for me.

I mine 8 hours a night with my 5850 as an investment in what could potentially be something big in the next twenty years. It takes no extra attention to schedule it every night, and heats my room to boot. So the benefits and potential returns outweigh the power cost.

I feel like Bitcoin would be a good currency backer, especially once it has received all 21 million of its generated coins. It might not take in the long-term, but there is profit to be had in short term trading, much like stocks. I'm merely banking on the small possibility it has to become relevant in economics in the near future amidst all the economic breakdown and systematic destruction of the gold standard by the US.

I looked at bitcoin and thought it was an idiots game, then I remember hearing when it got hacked and someone sold a load of hacked bitcoins which crashed the virtual market, they got the money and other people lost a lot, and it was proof that it was an idiot's game.

All the smart people with bitcoins got in when it first started and have sold everything they got from it, now it's just a pyramid scheme.

I looked at bitcoin and thought it was an idiots game, then I remember hearing when it got hacked and someone sold a load of hacked bitcoins which crashed the virtual market, they got the money and other people lost a lot, and it was proof that it was an idiot's game.

All the smart people with bitcoins got in when it first started and have sold everything they got from it, now it's just a pyramid scheme.

And now it's back up to 10+ USD per Bitcoin. People lost faith after a huge bubble, but came back later. Bitcoin is like stock right now. If something happens to the companies supporting a new currency, share holders will lose faith, sell out, and bring the price down drastically. It's simple economics, really.

And now it's back up to 10+ USD per Bitcoin. People lost faith after a huge bubble, but came back later. Bitcoin is like stock right now. If something happens to the companies supporting a new currency, share holders will lose faith, sell out, and bring the price down drastically. It's simple economics, really.

And what sort of timescale does it take to generate 1 bitcoin with a couple of mid market GPUs ?

Let me explain how this works in layman's terms.

Bitcoin uses "blocks" to finalise every transaction, but in order to generate a new block, the network must first find a hash suitable. So it's like the network of miners are collectively brute forcing a password. The network generates 50 coins per block as inflation and an incentive, and gives it to the person who find the hash. The reward given will decrease over time until it's at a standstill at 21m~, and fees paid per transaction will go up to compensate to keep the miners mining. (fees bump up the order in which your transaction gets set into stone with the next block).

So now we have a basic explanation of how the market inflates for now, and where that inflation goes, but where does it end up after the miner who found it? There are two probable options:

1. A bitcoin miner got extremely lucky, and found it on his own.

2. A mining pool of many miners found it, and the 50 BTC are distributed based on pool policy.

The former is extremely less likely to happen.

poclbm is a miner that uses Open CL, and any hardware that can use Open CL will be able to generate coins for it. Guiminer is a basic GUI for poclbm and a number of other miners. There is a framerate you can put on the miner to give other applications priority, if you want to work your card 24/7 with minimal FPS drop in games.

There are many pools at varying popularity. I've been with "Eclipse Mining Consortium" since its conception, and I would recommend it based on its policy of an optional fee, and its reward algorithm. I recommend everybody do a google search, however, to see which pool would serve them best.

Last thing to note: As a rule of thumb, ATI is a far better hashrate than Nvidia. I think it's common knowledge that AMD usually has more raw computing power, however. Google some charts to see just what driver/card combination is the most effective. I have a 5850.

  • 5 months later...

I would love it to be a viable idea, and a profitable one!

But i just dont see it, i looked into it around a year ago and even then it just seemed like a bunch of people making insanely electric hungry setups just to farm these coins and then they have to hope the coins will be worth anything by the time they have a few saved up :/

I've mined 1 bitcoin in 4 months... I still have it too. I'm not sure how to sell it -_- ebay shows between 20-40 dollars for 1 bitcoin, but "we buy coins" websites will pay you 5 dollars for one... Plus paypal apparently freezes accounts of people who sell/buy bitcoins on ebay.

I simply don't know what to do with it...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • google, meta, microsoft, true cancers of modern society
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 changelog: Fixed a bug where Overwrite behaved as Overwrite All during same-drive move operations. AdvancedInstaller fixed the installer’s security vulnerability: EXE Bootstrapper resolved the %appdata% location incorrectly for the System account. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 | 14.6 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • First exciting thing to come to Windows in a long time ! This is the kind of things they should focus on, instead of cramming as much AI as they can in everything.
    • New AMD graphics driver fixes install issues and FSR 4.1 crashes on RX 7000 GPUs by Taras Buria AMD is rolling out yet another graphics driver. Version 26.6.4 is now available for download, bringing two important fixes. One is for those still using Windows 10 and having trouble installing driver 26.6.2. In fact, this patch is coming from the recently released hotfix, so it is not new if you are already running version 26.6.3. The second fix is for RX 7000 owners. AMD recently brought FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen graphics cards, but there was a bug with certain games crashing when using FSR 4.1. I experienced this issue with Forza Horizon 6, so today's driver should take care of that. Here is the official changelog: Intermittent install issue seen when installing AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.2 on Windows® 10 systems for Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Intermittent application crash may be observed in some games with AMD FSR Upscaling 4.1 enabled on Radeon™ RX 7000 series graphics products. Known issues include the following: Intermittent application crash or driver timeout may be observed while playing Battlefield™ 6 on AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. AMD is actively working on a resolution with the developer to be released as soon as possible. Texture flickering or corruption may appear while playing Battlefield™ 6 with AMD Record and Stream on some AMD graphics products. AMD FSR Upscaling and AMD FSR Frame Generation may show as inactive in AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition while playing Battlefield™ 6 when enabled on Radeon™ RX 9000 series graphics products. Failure to install may be observed while installing AI Bundle components in some regions with limited access to HuggingFace and GitHub. Model flickering or rendering failure may be observed in Maxon Cinema 4D and Blender on Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Users experiencing this issue are recommended to install AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.3.1. Intermittent application crash may be observed on some models while running Blender on Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Users experiencing this issue are recommended to install AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.3.1. You can download the AMD Radeon driver 26.6.4 from the official website here. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • Amazon may use OpenAI and Nova models after Anthropic reportedly raises costs by Karthik Mudaliar Amazon is reportedly considering to use OpenAI models and even its own Nova family of AI models after Anthropic raised the cost of using Claude inside Amazon services. According to a report from The Information, Amazon is weighing its options to reduce costs under a new arrangement with Anthropic. But back in April, Amazon said it would invest $5 billion more in Anthropic, with the possibility of adding up to another $20 billion if certain commercial milestones are met. That investment actually came on top of another $8 billion Amazon had already put into the Claude maker. Anthropic, meanwhile, committed to spend more than $100 billion over 10 years on AWS technologies, including Amazon’s Trainium chips. Amazon isn't just a customer of Anthropic but also one of the most important backers and cloud partners. This is why it makes it interesting that Amazon is considering other alternatives to handle its internal workloads. Although Amazon has been building its own options for a while now. Its Nova family of AI models was announced in late 2024 for Amazon Bedrock, with models aimed at text, image, and video tasks. Amazon pitched the model around cost and latency at that time. With that said, OpenAI has also become a more realistic option recently for AWS customers as well as for Amazon itself. Earlier this year, OpenAI brought its latest models and Codex coding agent to Amazon Bedrock, after changes to its previously more restrictive Microsoft cloud arrangement. This allowed AWS to serve even those customers who wanted other alternatives from Claude, without having to move workloads out of Amazon's cloud. Evaluating alternatives could also be due to commercial pressure and not necessarily a sign of a damaged partnership between Amazon and Anthropic. Whether or not Amazon is actually considering switching entirely to OpenAI's models or its own Nova models remains unknown at this moment.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      61
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!