Jump to content
|Topic||Stats||Last action by|
|Guide:WP8.1 Preview - Want Cortana outside of US?||
|There's a Viagra ice cream, and it's blue||
|Guide:WP8.1 Preview - Uploading to OneDrive with Autoupload turned off||
|Metroidvania-Style Game "Heart Forth, Alicia" Looks Great, Seeks Funds||
|SpaceX Dragon CRS-3 (ISS mission thread)||
Posted 10 September 2012 - 23:41
Posted 12 September 2012 - 10:24
General Motors is taking a $49,000 bath on each Chevy Volt it sells, according to a report.
Citing data provided by consulting firm Munro & Associates, Reuters estimates that each one of the ballyhooed pug-in hybrid vehicles is currently costing upward of $89,000 to produce. With a sticker price of just less than $40,000, that makes for a sticker price disaster.
GM denied the estimate, calling it “grossly wrong, in part because the reporters allocated product development costs across the number of Volts sold instead of allocating across the lifetime volume of the program.”
But Sandy Munro told FoxNews.com that he stands behind the number, though he added that it was calculated based on industry standards without any specific inside information about the Volt program.
GM has never released exact numbers on development and production costs for the Volt, in part because many of the components used to make it are shared with other vehicles, including its platform and internal combustion engine. Nevertheless, even before it went into production the automaker admitted that the first generation of the car was not likely to turn a profit.
GM's response to the Reuters article further states that “every investment in technology that GM makes is designed to have a payoff for our customers, to meet future regulatory requirements and add to the bottom line. The Volt is no different, even if it takes longer to become profitable.”
Posted 12 September 2012 - 10:25
The sad part is that the American taxpayer is paying for this disaster caused by the Obama regime. I'll be elated to see him go this November.
Posted 12 September 2012 - 10:36
Actually, unlike the Bush debt, OBama didn't give money to these companies, he gave them loans, which are almost paid back. The government is MAKING money off the loans. You fail.
Posted 12 September 2012 - 10:41
Posted 12 September 2012 - 11:42
Posted 12 September 2012 - 23:58
Posted 13 September 2012 - 03:29
Posted 13 September 2012 - 18:51