Digital Speedometer


Recommended Posts

Okay so I am looking at buying a car so I can eventually move out and keep my current job and I am looking at buying a 2006 For Focus LX 1.8 but I want to get a Digital Speedometer, Fuel Indicator and RPM Indicator for the car but I've searched online and cant find ANYTHING at all > <.

Anyone know where I can get a Digital Speedometer etc online.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1107543-digital-speedometer/
Share on other sites

Any reason why?

You can get devices that hook into the car's diagnostics bus and give you readouts like this, but they're invariably slow to update ? the fastest I could ever get a dedicated diagnostics system to read this stuff was about 1Hz on a modern CAN bus when I was doing research for my degree. Dedicated consumer digital reader devices may fake it faster by interpolating, though.

Also, it's worth noting that many, many cars these days use digital readouts already ? they just have an analogue dial at the end. I don't think you'll find a single new car on the market today that has a mechanical connection all the way to the dashboard. I had a 2005 Mazda (who were owned by Ford at the time) that used such a digital system.

Back on topic, I can't actually help other than stuff like this for iOS: http://sturminteractive.com/2011/07/26/gopoint-technology-gl1-odb-ii-for-ios/ ? my system wasn't designed to be actually used while driving, only recording for later analysis. If you actually end up replacing the car's stock instruments with something else, make sure you do your research thoroughly since having a device that doesn't have an approved calibration can be tricky, law wise, in some areas.

If you're not replacing the car's internal instruments then this post wraps around to the beginning ? why?

I want to get some with Digital Readouts because if I can see in a clear number the speed I am going nice and big on the dashboard it helps.

I have had a few driving lessons and with the Dial it annoys me because I am looking at this needle and I like to see clear numbers in front of me. I just find it easier.

Like you said about them being slow to update. It doesn't even need to be a full replacement just something with a Digital Readout telling me my speed that is apart of the Dashboard.

You can get a car that has them built in - the only car I can think of in that class is the Honda Civic (2006+, at least in the US market). I know it's not an ideal solution, but ikenndac has a good point

Never really liked the look of a Honda Civic Interior TBH.

Just looking for a nice, decent car for ?2,500 that I can add a Digital Read Out too while keeping the old one I guess.

If you have a phone or gps enabled device, then you can download digital speedometer app.

Go to app store and look up then download it to use it while you use it in your car..

Or look for aftermarket shops and you can replace the analog dashboard with your new digital dashboard.

Never really liked the look of a Honda Civic Interior TBH.

Just looking for a nice, decent car for ?2,500 that I can add a Digital Read Out too while keeping the old one I guess.

My aunt has a Suzuki Areo and it had a stock digital speedo, it was inaccurate at times (I find the one in the civic's to be the same case) Nothing beats a dial.

My aunt has a Suzuki Areo and it had a stock digital speedo, it was inaccurate at times

You know, my Mazda was the same. Then, when I was doing the research mentioned in my post further up I noticed that the speed figure received straight from the car's diagnostics bus was much more accurate, and the display was intentionally inaccurate (by around 5% faster than I was actually travelling).

Turns out it's legal for a speedo to be calibrated to read up to 10% too fast, but not for it to read too slow, so car manufacturers intentionally make their speedos a bit too fast to give them a safer margin.

It *also* turns out that all the cars with dials I've had since then are the same, but because you read it as "almost 50mph" instead of "47mph", you notice it a bit less.

If you can't get an in dash replacement, I would honestly suggest you learn how to use an analogue speedo.

Do not try and use a GPS device as a speedo. There are tons of reasons why, including inaccuracy, but also in most countries you will find it's illegal due to the screen or where it's placed or whatever else.

I'd recommend getting a car with dials until you learn how to drive. I'm sorry, but "I don't like it" is ridiculous, you need to know how to read the needles first, then go to a digital.

My car has a standard cluster, with digital speed read out, it came standard with the car. Addons and GPS are not accurate.

You know, my Mazda was the same. Then, when I was doing the research mentioned in my post further up I noticed that the speed figure received straight from the car's diagnostics bus was much more accurate, and the display was intentionally inaccurate (by around 5% faster than I was actually travelling).

Turns out it's legal for a speedo to be calibrated to read up to 10% too fast, but not for it to read too slow, so car manufacturers intentionally make their speedos a bit too fast to give them a safer margin.

It *also* turns out that all the cars with dials I've had since then are the same, but because you read it as "almost 50mph" instead of "47mph", you notice it a bit less.

This was a tolerance thing with cable drive speedos. This doesn't occur in new vehicles. Our shop diagnostic equipment can confirm this too.

Anyway, people don't seem to worry about their speedo being out, just look at the majority of people who have put biggers wheels on their car, and not had the speedo re-calibrated or the default wheel setting changed in the ECU.

This was a tolerance thing with cable drive speedos. This doesn't occur in new vehicles. Our shop diagnostic equipment can confirm this too.

I think you misread my post. While doing the research, I did a 20 minute-long run at 100mph indicated (circular track at Millbrook in the UK). The speedo read 100 mph the whole way, while the ODB bus was reading 96 mph the whole way. The display had an intentional increase.

I think most modern cars have digital dials (but in analog format) I know my Grand Prix's analog gauges are connected to the car's data bus, no analog connection, just data and power. the ODB2 bus though updates a lot less frequently... if its a newer car you might be able to find a gauge cluster that replaces your "analog" gauges with digital ones

but seriosusly though, learn to drive with gauges... even new digital cluster cars have analog gauges on them shown graphically

I'd recommend getting a car with dials until you learn how to drive. I'm sorry, but "I don't like it" is ridiculous, you need to know how to read the needles first, then go to a digital.

I 100% agree. Learn to drive your car the "normal" way, then look at changes.

I 100% agree. Learn to drive your car the "normal" way, then look at changes.

Honestly, I quite agree. If you can't tell how fast you are going by either looking at the dial (which come on, is not a difficult task AT ALL) or by just a judgement of speed, I do not want you driving on the same roads as me. Fortunately, OP is in England.

Let's face it, learn it the "normal" way, because 95%+ of the cars have analog dials. Some may have digital only or a combination of both. Just learn or adapt.

I wouldn't bother, just learn the analogue way (is it even learning?) you tilt your eyes slightly now and then to see the speed. Honestly as you learn to drive you'll find you're able to judge the speed when you're used to the car, same way you learn to change gear by hearing the revs.

If you can't learn to drive with an analogue speedo (everyone else has). Then i doubt you'll be able to put a dash replacement in the car :laugh:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!