Digital Speedometer


Recommended Posts

Okay so I am looking at buying a car so I can eventually move out and keep my current job and I am looking at buying a 2006 For Focus LX 1.8 but I want to get a Digital Speedometer, Fuel Indicator and RPM Indicator for the car but I've searched online and cant find ANYTHING at all > <.

Anyone know where I can get a Digital Speedometer etc online.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1107543-digital-speedometer/
Share on other sites

Any reason why?

You can get devices that hook into the car's diagnostics bus and give you readouts like this, but they're invariably slow to update ? the fastest I could ever get a dedicated diagnostics system to read this stuff was about 1Hz on a modern CAN bus when I was doing research for my degree. Dedicated consumer digital reader devices may fake it faster by interpolating, though.

Also, it's worth noting that many, many cars these days use digital readouts already ? they just have an analogue dial at the end. I don't think you'll find a single new car on the market today that has a mechanical connection all the way to the dashboard. I had a 2005 Mazda (who were owned by Ford at the time) that used such a digital system.

Back on topic, I can't actually help other than stuff like this for iOS: http://sturminteractive.com/2011/07/26/gopoint-technology-gl1-odb-ii-for-ios/ ? my system wasn't designed to be actually used while driving, only recording for later analysis. If you actually end up replacing the car's stock instruments with something else, make sure you do your research thoroughly since having a device that doesn't have an approved calibration can be tricky, law wise, in some areas.

If you're not replacing the car's internal instruments then this post wraps around to the beginning ? why?

I want to get some with Digital Readouts because if I can see in a clear number the speed I am going nice and big on the dashboard it helps.

I have had a few driving lessons and with the Dial it annoys me because I am looking at this needle and I like to see clear numbers in front of me. I just find it easier.

Like you said about them being slow to update. It doesn't even need to be a full replacement just something with a Digital Readout telling me my speed that is apart of the Dashboard.

You can get a car that has them built in - the only car I can think of in that class is the Honda Civic (2006+, at least in the US market). I know it's not an ideal solution, but ikenndac has a good point

Never really liked the look of a Honda Civic Interior TBH.

Just looking for a nice, decent car for ?2,500 that I can add a Digital Read Out too while keeping the old one I guess.

If you have a phone or gps enabled device, then you can download digital speedometer app.

Go to app store and look up then download it to use it while you use it in your car..

Or look for aftermarket shops and you can replace the analog dashboard with your new digital dashboard.

Never really liked the look of a Honda Civic Interior TBH.

Just looking for a nice, decent car for ?2,500 that I can add a Digital Read Out too while keeping the old one I guess.

My aunt has a Suzuki Areo and it had a stock digital speedo, it was inaccurate at times (I find the one in the civic's to be the same case) Nothing beats a dial.

My aunt has a Suzuki Areo and it had a stock digital speedo, it was inaccurate at times

You know, my Mazda was the same. Then, when I was doing the research mentioned in my post further up I noticed that the speed figure received straight from the car's diagnostics bus was much more accurate, and the display was intentionally inaccurate (by around 5% faster than I was actually travelling).

Turns out it's legal for a speedo to be calibrated to read up to 10% too fast, but not for it to read too slow, so car manufacturers intentionally make their speedos a bit too fast to give them a safer margin.

It *also* turns out that all the cars with dials I've had since then are the same, but because you read it as "almost 50mph" instead of "47mph", you notice it a bit less.

If you can't get an in dash replacement, I would honestly suggest you learn how to use an analogue speedo.

Do not try and use a GPS device as a speedo. There are tons of reasons why, including inaccuracy, but also in most countries you will find it's illegal due to the screen or where it's placed or whatever else.

I'd recommend getting a car with dials until you learn how to drive. I'm sorry, but "I don't like it" is ridiculous, you need to know how to read the needles first, then go to a digital.

My car has a standard cluster, with digital speed read out, it came standard with the car. Addons and GPS are not accurate.

You know, my Mazda was the same. Then, when I was doing the research mentioned in my post further up I noticed that the speed figure received straight from the car's diagnostics bus was much more accurate, and the display was intentionally inaccurate (by around 5% faster than I was actually travelling).

Turns out it's legal for a speedo to be calibrated to read up to 10% too fast, but not for it to read too slow, so car manufacturers intentionally make their speedos a bit too fast to give them a safer margin.

It *also* turns out that all the cars with dials I've had since then are the same, but because you read it as "almost 50mph" instead of "47mph", you notice it a bit less.

This was a tolerance thing with cable drive speedos. This doesn't occur in new vehicles. Our shop diagnostic equipment can confirm this too.

Anyway, people don't seem to worry about their speedo being out, just look at the majority of people who have put biggers wheels on their car, and not had the speedo re-calibrated or the default wheel setting changed in the ECU.

This was a tolerance thing with cable drive speedos. This doesn't occur in new vehicles. Our shop diagnostic equipment can confirm this too.

I think you misread my post. While doing the research, I did a 20 minute-long run at 100mph indicated (circular track at Millbrook in the UK). The speedo read 100 mph the whole way, while the ODB bus was reading 96 mph the whole way. The display had an intentional increase.

I think most modern cars have digital dials (but in analog format) I know my Grand Prix's analog gauges are connected to the car's data bus, no analog connection, just data and power. the ODB2 bus though updates a lot less frequently... if its a newer car you might be able to find a gauge cluster that replaces your "analog" gauges with digital ones

but seriosusly though, learn to drive with gauges... even new digital cluster cars have analog gauges on them shown graphically

I'd recommend getting a car with dials until you learn how to drive. I'm sorry, but "I don't like it" is ridiculous, you need to know how to read the needles first, then go to a digital.

I 100% agree. Learn to drive your car the "normal" way, then look at changes.

I 100% agree. Learn to drive your car the "normal" way, then look at changes.

Honestly, I quite agree. If you can't tell how fast you are going by either looking at the dial (which come on, is not a difficult task AT ALL) or by just a judgement of speed, I do not want you driving on the same roads as me. Fortunately, OP is in England.

Let's face it, learn it the "normal" way, because 95%+ of the cars have analog dials. Some may have digital only or a combination of both. Just learn or adapt.

I wouldn't bother, just learn the analogue way (is it even learning?) you tilt your eyes slightly now and then to see the speed. Honestly as you learn to drive you'll find you're able to judge the speed when you're used to the car, same way you learn to change gear by hearing the revs.

If you can't learn to drive with an analogue speedo (everyone else has). Then i doubt you'll be able to put a dash replacement in the car :laugh:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      80
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!