Help with installing new RAM


Recommended Posts

I just had a 1gb stick of ram go bad in my Dell XPS 410. I had only 2gb total before one of my sticks went bad. I am pretty sure that is the case, cause I've researched it online extensively. It would sometimes randomly crash, then make a beeping noise and show the numbers 3 and 4 on the front of my tower and it wouldn't boot at first, but if I kept trying it would eventually boot. It would even stay on for awhile sometimes, but then it would eventually crash. I'm just using one stick and all seems to be well for the time being. Of course I am thinking about buying ram, but the question is which type and how much? I looked at the old chip, and it says Samsung on it. I have read that Dell uses cheap ram. I believe it is the 533mhz PC5300 kind, but I have read that my motherboard supports the 800mhz PC6400. I'm thinking 4gb should be enough, but I want to know which type of ram I should buy? Also, is it better to go with two 2gb's, or 4 1gb sticks? I have 4 slots, and like I said my motherboard supposedly supports ram up to 800mhz PC6400. Is it worth it to go to the faster ram? I have never updated my BIOS. That's not going to be a problem, is it? I read online that my board can actually support 8gb of ram as long as it's under 64 bit Windows 7, which it is. I thought I read that I would need to update my BIOS for the 8gb of ram to show up. I have been hesitant to do so, cause I heard if things go wrong it can brick your motherboard. I'm pretty sure I don't need to update my BIOS if all I'm doing is using 4gb of ram, but I am not 100% sure. Does anyone know for sure? I am probably going to pick it up at Walmart or Staples, so can anyone point me in the direction of the ram I should buy from their sites? I don't play games, I just use it for surfing the net with Firefox and many tabs open, playing music, watching movies and TV shows. I'm assuming 4gb of ram, or maybe even 6gb should be enough for just standard Windows stuff like that. I got by on 2gb of ram pretty decently, but there are times Firefox would freeze for a couple of seconds here and there. I was thinking maybe Kingston. I will probably upgrade to Win8 in the near future, so will 4gb be enough? Let me know! Thanks!

I just had a 1gb stick of ram go bad in my Dell XPS 410. I had only 2gb total before one of my sticks went bad. I am pretty sure that is the case, cause I've researched it online extensively. It would sometimes randomly crash, then make a beeping noise and show the numbers 3 and 4 on the front of my tower and it wouldn't boot at first, but if I kept trying it would eventually boot. It would even stay on for awhile sometimes, but then it would eventually crash. I'm just using one stick and all seems to be well for the time being. Of course I am thinking about buying ram, but the question is which type and how much? I looked at the old chip, and it says Samsung on it. I have read that Dell uses cheap ram. I believe it is the 533mhz PC5300 kind, but I have read that my motherboard supports the 800mhz PC6400. I'm thinking 4gb should be enough, but I want to know which type of ram I should buy? Also, is it better to go with two 2gb's, or 4 1gb sticks? I have 4 slots, and like I said my motherboard supposedly supports ram up to 800mhz PC6400. Is it worth it to go to the faster ram? I have never updated my BIOS. That's not going to be a problem, is it? I read online that my board can actually support 8gb of ram as long as it's under 64 bit Windows 7, which it is. I thought I read that I would need to update my BIOS for the 8gb of ram to show up. I have been hesitant to do so, cause I heard if things go wrong it can brick your motherboard. I'm pretty sure I don't need to update my BIOS if all I'm doing is using 4gb of ram, but I am not 100% sure. Does anyone know for sure? I am probably going to pick it up at Walmart or Staples, so can anyone point me in the direction of the ram I should buy from their sites? I don't play games, I just use it for surfing the net with Firefox and many tabs open, playing music, watching movies and TV shows. I'm assuming 4gb of ram, or maybe even 6gb should be enough for just standard Windows stuff like that. I got by on 2gb of ram pretty decently, but there are times Firefox would freeze for a couple of seconds here and there. I was thinking maybe Kingston. I will probably upgrade to Win8 in the near future, so will 4gb be enough? Let me know! Thanks!

One of the problems is, there is a lot of conflicting information about how much ram my board supports total and how much per slot. The manual says 4gb total and 1gb per slot, but people online say it can support up to 8gb as long as it's under 64 bit Windows. I think you might have to update the BIOS in order for it to display properly. I figure 4gb of ram should be good enough. The main questions I need answered are: Which type of ram should I buy? 533mhz PC5300, or 800mhz PC6400? Also, two 2gb sticks, or 4 1gb sticks? Will I need to update my BIOS in order for the 4gb to show up, or is that just for the 8gb? Please someone let me know, so I can buy the correct RAM as soon as possible! Running Windows 7 with Firefox open and several tabs is not fun on only 1gb of RAM.
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1108087-help-with-installing-new-ram/
Share on other sites

http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/systems/xps410/en/SM_EN/specs.htm

4GB

PC6400 is better, but you won't see much difference between that and PC5300. If price is about the same, get the faster RAM.

There might be a BIOS update for that, but I don't know if they ever upgrade the maximum memory with an update. I would get 2 sticks or 4, whichever is cheaper. They'll perform about the same. As long as you have pairs, you'll get dual-channel. 2 sticks is better if you plan on using in another system or adding more later.

http://support.dell....SM_EN/specs.htm

4GB

PC6400 is better, but you won't see much difference between that and PC5300. If price is about the same, get the faster RAM.

There might be a BIOS update for that, but I don't know if they ever upgrade the maximum memory with an update. I would get 2 sticks or 4, whichever is cheaper. They'll perform about the same. As long as you have pairs, you'll get dual-channel. 2 sticks is better if you plan on using in another system or adding more later.

Thanks for replying. So I shouldn't need to do a BIOS update if I only upgrade to 4gb? What about 6gb or 8gb? As I said, there is conflicting information out there. I have to find the link, but there is a guy out there that showed pictures to prove that he upgraded to 8gb of RAM. They say the manual says 4gb, because at the time 64 bit operating systems weren't really widely used. I'm probably just going to go with 4gb of ram, though. Is Kingston a good brand? I've read that it is. I just hope I don't have to update my BIOS in order for Win7 to see the RAM. I don't think I will have to, but I'm not certain. Has anyone ever heard of that happening?

don't start messing with your BIOS, this is an older board so it's not worth it. stay with what the manual says in terms of max memory and memory speed. i'm sorry, maybe i missed it, but how many slots do you have there? anyway, if it keeps acting up you need to consider the fact that it might be the connectors going back - if indeed this is an older board.

Thanks for your reply! 4 slots. Like I said, the manual says 4gb total and 1gb per slot, but there are many websites that claim you can get it all the way up to 8gb total by using 2gb per slot. I might just do 4gb total, but I'm really torn on whether I should go with two 2gb sticks, or 4 1gb sticks? I might just buy one 2gb and try it out in one slot. It won't destroy my board if it doesn't work, right? It should just beep and not allow me to boot, right? I'm pretty sure the one 2gb chip will work in one slot, but the question is if I need a new BIOS update in order for it to recognize it. I don't think I do, but who knows?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      452
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!