• 0

String += appending ASCII value instead of char


Question

I've been experimenting with visual C++ having worked in Java for a while. Right now I'm working with a little String manipulation.

I have a Windows Form with a textBox that displays the value of a String. I'm trying to append a char to the String. The problem I'm having is the ASCII value of the String is appended instead of the char itself. So far I haven't been able to find a solution through the resources I've read. Here is an example:

String^ mystring;

char y = 'd';

mystring = "Test";

mystring += y;

textBox->Text = mystring;

The output is "Test100" instead of "Testd" (100 being the ASCII value of d). What should I be doing differently?

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I think you will need to do something like this:

mystring += "" + y;

I don't have a compiler in front of me, but you could also try casting y to a string e.g.:

mystring += (string) y;

EDIT: Whoops, just realised this is Visual C++, not C#. Not sure if either of these things will work.

  • 0

It may be that the reason you're seeing the decimal value instead of the ASCII character is because char is a decimal type. It is a decimal type just large enough to hold an ASCII character: 8-bits. Try referencing it as a pointer instead of a single character to make it a C-style string.

  • Like 1
  • 0

Is 'String' a Microsoft-centric data type or did you mistype the name of the standard 'string' class? The string class in the standard library can append single characters, C-style strings, and standard strings using the '+=' operator.

Without knowing the data type of 'textBox->Text', I'm assuming that something like the following will work:


std::string mystring;
char y = 'd';

mystring = "Test";
mystring += y;
textBox->Text = mystring.c_str();
[/CODE]

Alternatively, you could forgo the niceness of the string class and use only C-style strings. Your example would then look something like this:

[CODE]
char mystring[50];
char y = 'd';

strcpy( mystring, "Test" );
strncat( mystring, &y, 1 );
textBox->Text = mystring;
[/CODE]

  • Like 1
  • 0

String^ mystring;
char y = 'd';
mystring = "Test";
mystring += y;
textBox->Text = mystring;[/CODE]

This is C++/CLI. The caret "^" on a type name is not C++ syntax, it denotes a managed type, here System::String. If you want to learn C++, make sure you create an empty C++ project, not a "CLR" project. You won't be able to work directly with Winforms with C++; if working with Winforms is what you want, learn C# instead. I strongly doubt you want to learn C++/CLI, it is more complicated than you can imagine and it doesn't serve much purpose besides building bridges between the native and the managed world.

Anyway, with System::String you can't append a char to a string using the += operator, however you could call ToString() on the character and append that isntead, i.e.

[CODE]mystring += y->ToString();[/CODE]

But really, run from C++/CLI while there is still time. File -> New -> Project -> Visual C++ -> General -> Empty Project. Now you're doing real, ISO C++. It's complicated enough by itself.

  • Like 5
  • 0

.NET uses unicode characters. Use wchar_t instead of char.

wchar_t y = L'd';[/CODE]

It most likely chooses int (System::Int32) as the closest conversion for char as a result, resulting in the decimal number.

If you really want to use char throughout your code, then you can do something similar to Dr_Asik's suggestion by using Convert::ToString:

[CODE]char y = 'd';
String ^value = Convert::ToString(y);[/CODE]

This link explains the mapping of types to the CLI: http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/uploadfile/b942f9/cppcli-for-the-C-Sharp-programmer/ , which is why it maps to a number rather than a character (it does not widen to the number, rather it widens to an integer).

  • Like 1
  • 0

Scrapped everything and redid the project in C#. Holy crap was it easier. I was thinking I could do it in C++ since that's what I used in college (command line progs only). That Visual C++/CLI stuff sucked. Knowing Java I was pretty much able to code in C# without having to look up much of anything. Came up with this little Class for creating a password:


class SecurePassword
{
private String password;
private int length;
RNGCryptoServiceProvider rng = new RNGCryptoServiceProvider();
Random random = new Random();
public void generatePassword(bool useUpper, bool useNumber)
{
char ch;
int i;
int type;
password = "";
for (i = 0; i < this.length; i++)
{
type = (random.Next(0, 4));
if (type == 0 && useUpper)
ch = getRandomUpperChar();
else if (type == 1 && useNumber)
ch = getRandomDigit();
else
ch = getRandomLowerChar();

password += ch;
}
}
public char getRandomDigit()
{
byte[] byteCh = new byte[4];
double range;
uint intCh;
rng.GetBytes(byteCh);
intCh = BitConverter.ToUInt32(byteCh, 0);
range = intCh / 4294967296.0;
intCh = (uint)(range * 10);
return Convert.ToChar(intCh + 48);
}
public char getRandomLowerChar()
{
byte[] byteCh = new byte[4];
double range;
uint intCh;
rng.GetBytes(byteCh);
intCh = BitConverter.ToUInt32(byteCh, 0);
range = intCh / 4294967296.0;
intCh = (uint)(range * 26);
return Convert.ToChar(intCh + 97);
}
public char getRandomUpperChar()
{
byte[] byteCh = new byte[4];
double range;
uint intCh;
rng.GetBytes(byteCh);
intCh = BitConverter.ToUInt32(byteCh, 0);
range = intCh / 4294967296.0;
intCh = (uint)(range * 26);
return Convert.ToChar(intCh + 65);
}
public String getPassword()
{
return password;
}
public void setLength(int len)
{
length = len;
}
}
[/CODE]

Had a little hiccup converting the byte array to a character in the range I wanted, Im sure my solution is a bit sloppy. I wanted to use the secure random methods instead of just Random.Next(min, max).

  • 0

Had a little hiccup converting the byte array to a character in the range I wanted, Im sure my solution is a bit sloppy. I wanted to use the secure random methods instead of just Random.Next(min, max).

Note: you're still using Random.Next(...) in your main loop.

Also, you could probably simplify the code a lot with your bytes-to-number conversion being extracted into a separate function.

private char getCharacter(uint start, uint range)
{
    byte[] bytes = new byte[1];

    // realistically, given the expected ranges (not even a full byte), you could use a single byte
    rng.GetBytes(bytes);

    return Convert.ToChar(start + bytes[0] % range);
}
[/CODE]

Any random lowercase character: [code]ch = getCharacter((uint)'a', 26);

Any random uppercase character:

ch = getCharacter((uint)'A', 26);

Any random number character:

ch = getCharacter((uint)'0', 10);

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Deal for those who want 1900 size electronics in their house? with 2026/7 hardware mhm.. not nice
    • Cheap labour, the same as the U.K. China pays their people pittance.
    • Those people that come over here on boats are already in a safe country, if they want to come over here then do so correctly though the right channels. I was born in the U.K, my family that came over here came so via the proper means. My partner came here via the correct channels, she also became a British citizen, she knows more about this country than most of them that was born here, including myself, she worked hard to do what she does. She will stick up for this country and have done a few times, when people from her own part of world have put the U.K down. We are not going to agree, all I said to start with is that maybe Trump has the right idea with this America first thing and maybe we should start doing the same. Maybe not as drastic as what he is doing, but we do need to sort this country out, we need to sort out tech instead of relying on the U.S and others. Again you have not shown why you are so annoyed that we have left the E.U and this is what it is all about? If you don't live in the U.K and live in the E.U are you annoyed that we left your little club? If you live in the U.K and is pro-E.U, then fair enough then I can see how it annoys you. Are you one of these people who lives in the U.K and have a holiday chalet in the E.U and can now only stay there for so long? If so, then that is bad luck. As I have posted before, I have no problem with people coming here to work, as long as they do if via the proper channels. We are out of the E.U, people voted out, and maybe if more people had voted instead of sitting on their backsides the results would have been different. But they like the E.U and our government thought no we would not vote to leave. How wrong they were, surprised me. I expected to wake up in the morning and hear on the radio that we voted to stay. As I said, we are out and have been for 10 years, we are not going to go back in anytime soon if we ever do, so we all need to make the best of how things are. Anyway, this is supposed to be a tech site.
    • Tim Cook: "The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills." What's the point of wasting time getting those skills if you can't get a job with them? Good Lord, maybe he and his cohort of CEO's who exported all these jobs to China should just shut the f**k up :D
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      214
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!