• 0

String += appending ASCII value instead of char


Question

I've been experimenting with visual C++ having worked in Java for a while. Right now I'm working with a little String manipulation.

I have a Windows Form with a textBox that displays the value of a String. I'm trying to append a char to the String. The problem I'm having is the ASCII value of the String is appended instead of the char itself. So far I haven't been able to find a solution through the resources I've read. Here is an example:

String^ mystring;

char y = 'd';

mystring = "Test";

mystring += y;

textBox->Text = mystring;

The output is "Test100" instead of "Testd" (100 being the ASCII value of d). What should I be doing differently?

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I think you will need to do something like this:

mystring += "" + y;

I don't have a compiler in front of me, but you could also try casting y to a string e.g.:

mystring += (string) y;

EDIT: Whoops, just realised this is Visual C++, not C#. Not sure if either of these things will work.

  • 0

It may be that the reason you're seeing the decimal value instead of the ASCII character is because char is a decimal type. It is a decimal type just large enough to hold an ASCII character: 8-bits. Try referencing it as a pointer instead of a single character to make it a C-style string.

  • Like 1
  • 0

Is 'String' a Microsoft-centric data type or did you mistype the name of the standard 'string' class? The string class in the standard library can append single characters, C-style strings, and standard strings using the '+=' operator.

Without knowing the data type of 'textBox->Text', I'm assuming that something like the following will work:


std::string mystring;
char y = 'd';

mystring = "Test";
mystring += y;
textBox->Text = mystring.c_str();
[/CODE]

Alternatively, you could forgo the niceness of the string class and use only C-style strings. Your example would then look something like this:

[CODE]
char mystring[50];
char y = 'd';

strcpy( mystring, "Test" );
strncat( mystring, &y, 1 );
textBox->Text = mystring;
[/CODE]

  • Like 1
  • 0

String^ mystring;
char y = 'd';
mystring = "Test";
mystring += y;
textBox->Text = mystring;[/CODE]

This is C++/CLI. The caret "^" on a type name is not C++ syntax, it denotes a managed type, here System::String. If you want to learn C++, make sure you create an empty C++ project, not a "CLR" project. You won't be able to work directly with Winforms with C++; if working with Winforms is what you want, learn C# instead. I strongly doubt you want to learn C++/CLI, it is more complicated than you can imagine and it doesn't serve much purpose besides building bridges between the native and the managed world.

Anyway, with System::String you can't append a char to a string using the += operator, however you could call ToString() on the character and append that isntead, i.e.

[CODE]mystring += y->ToString();[/CODE]

But really, run from C++/CLI while there is still time. File -> New -> Project -> Visual C++ -> General -> Empty Project. Now you're doing real, ISO C++. It's complicated enough by itself.

  • 0

.NET uses unicode characters. Use wchar_t instead of char.

wchar_t y = L'd';[/CODE]

It most likely chooses int (System::Int32) as the closest conversion for char as a result, resulting in the decimal number.

If you really want to use char throughout your code, then you can do something similar to Dr_Asik's suggestion by using Convert::ToString:

[CODE]char y = 'd';
String ^value = Convert::ToString(y);[/CODE]

This link explains the mapping of types to the CLI: http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/uploadfile/b942f9/cppcli-for-the-C-Sharp-programmer/ , which is why it maps to a number rather than a character (it does not widen to the number, rather it widens to an integer).

  • Like 1
  • 0

Scrapped everything and redid the project in C#. Holy crap was it easier. I was thinking I could do it in C++ since that's what I used in college (command line progs only). That Visual C++/CLI stuff sucked. Knowing Java I was pretty much able to code in C# without having to look up much of anything. Came up with this little Class for creating a password:


class SecurePassword
{
private String password;
private int length;
RNGCryptoServiceProvider rng = new RNGCryptoServiceProvider();
Random random = new Random();
public void generatePassword(bool useUpper, bool useNumber)
{
char ch;
int i;
int type;
password = "";
for (i = 0; i < this.length; i++)
{
type = (random.Next(0, 4));
if (type == 0 && useUpper)
ch = getRandomUpperChar();
else if (type == 1 && useNumber)
ch = getRandomDigit();
else
ch = getRandomLowerChar();

password += ch;
}
}
public char getRandomDigit()
{
byte[] byteCh = new byte[4];
double range;
uint intCh;
rng.GetBytes(byteCh);
intCh = BitConverter.ToUInt32(byteCh, 0);
range = intCh / 4294967296.0;
intCh = (uint)(range * 10);
return Convert.ToChar(intCh + 48);
}
public char getRandomLowerChar()
{
byte[] byteCh = new byte[4];
double range;
uint intCh;
rng.GetBytes(byteCh);
intCh = BitConverter.ToUInt32(byteCh, 0);
range = intCh / 4294967296.0;
intCh = (uint)(range * 26);
return Convert.ToChar(intCh + 97);
}
public char getRandomUpperChar()
{
byte[] byteCh = new byte[4];
double range;
uint intCh;
rng.GetBytes(byteCh);
intCh = BitConverter.ToUInt32(byteCh, 0);
range = intCh / 4294967296.0;
intCh = (uint)(range * 26);
return Convert.ToChar(intCh + 65);
}
public String getPassword()
{
return password;
}
public void setLength(int len)
{
length = len;
}
}
[/CODE]

Had a little hiccup converting the byte array to a character in the range I wanted, Im sure my solution is a bit sloppy. I wanted to use the secure random methods instead of just Random.Next(min, max).

  • 0

Had a little hiccup converting the byte array to a character in the range I wanted, Im sure my solution is a bit sloppy. I wanted to use the secure random methods instead of just Random.Next(min, max).

Note: you're still using Random.Next(...) in your main loop.

Also, you could probably simplify the code a lot with your bytes-to-number conversion being extracted into a separate function.

private char getCharacter(uint start, uint range)
{
    byte[] bytes = new byte[1];

    // realistically, given the expected ranges (not even a full byte), you could use a single byte
    rng.GetBytes(bytes);

    return Convert.ToChar(start + bytes[0] % range);
}
[/CODE]

Any random lowercase character: [code]ch = getCharacter((uint)'a', 26);

Any random uppercase character:

ch = getCharacter((uint)'A', 26);

Any random number character:

ch = getCharacter((uint)'0', 10);

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Excuse me for having an opinion, fella'... (Why am I not surprised?...) Congrats on your very informative post however...
    • By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread.
    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!