• 0

Question

Hi,

I have an html form that i would like external customers will be able to fill up and send it back to us.

<form action="[email protected]"?subject="email subject" method="submit">

For some reason in windows 7 64 bit, with outlook 2010 and explorer 9, mailto action doesn't work for me.

An empty outlook message is displayed and only the subject and recipients are added.

There is no attachment and no body text.

When I changed the default browser to FF i received the text i wanted in the body section instead as an attachment (postdata.att).

I can't use server code cause the html form is sent by outlook to external customers, so asp/php/cgi is irelevant for me.

Does anyone has a solution?

Thanks,

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1109569-mailto-problem-with-explorer-9/
Share on other sites

13 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Mailto works with a <a href="mailto:[email protected]">link</a> and makes the user able to open a email program and send a mail to [email protected] thsi does not however work like a email form.

To make a email form I suggest to use code like php,

you can easily copy paste code from here ;): http://www.freeconta.../email_form.php

  • 0

Unfortunately as I mentioned, I really can't use a server side code, so PHP is also not an option.

What about CDO? Can I use it as a solution?

I read somewhere that microsoft doesn't support this technology with outlook 2010.

Is there some sort of a replacement for the CDO protocol?

  • 0

you say

I can't use server code cause the html form is sent by outlook to external customers,

Is it the fact you cant use server side code or don't know how to insert text into outlook message from php?

You can send mail directly from php using your own mail server to external clients

  • 0

Hi,

i do know how to use a server side code. i have no problem with the part where I send the form the external customers.

My problem is when the customers submit the form they receive. At the moment I'm usiing the mailto action which works perfectly fine with IE8, but in IE9 returns a blank email with outlook 2010.

I have no control nor access to the web server of the client therefore I was looking for a solution which doesn't involve a server side script.

The database is located in my organization's server, I only need the customers to fill up some info via the form and to automatically update the data in my database.

Till now it worked great...

  • 0

You have no access to the server but can update the mailto link? Sorry that does not make any sense.

Also i will add that any site that deals with customers/clients should have a fully working contact form rather than a link that opens an email client its more professional and easier for the users as not everyone uses outlook like you seem to be suggesting. I suggest you contact whoever this is and get them to sort out a contact form the problem would be fixed and it make them look more professional rather than cheap and lazy.

  • Like 1
  • 0

Thank you very much for your answer.

I need to explain my self better. The form is not part of a site.

My organization uses a VB software that has VB forms. One of the software's functions is to export a VB form into an HTML form and send it automatically through Outlook to external customers.

Since we work with Microsoft technology, and all our customers are organizations which use outlook and exchange server, it is the only thing we need to support.

The mailto action is generated automaticlly by the VB code and since the code was developed in house, we can change it if needed.

However, I can't change the external customers' server code! the only interaction with them is through the outlook mail.

When they submit the form, we get an email notification, we are requested to approve the data and only then the database is updated.

The problem occurs only when they submit the form and not when we send it to them.

I really need to find a better solution for this.

I understand that there lots of problems with the mailto action, and that it depends on the type of browser and mailbox I'm using. In my case, I already know that I need to make it work with outlook 2010 and IE9.

What could be the problem?

  • 0

The problem with mailto is simple... it's internet explorer itself, as always :p

And if it's microsoft server you could use asp instead of php , never heard of a web server unable to run anything besides html :/

And only using the mailto option isn't going to be working since the fault is not the webpage but webbrowser, this might be fixed in IE10 on windows 8, I can test it if you want.

  • 0

Ok im confused and looking at this wrong what im getting is:

We create a form in VB its converted to HTML we send that to our customers

They then fill it in and send back, we then update our records after a notification

What i dont get is why your making it all complecated and you still dont use a form "Because we can not change there server code!" who says you have to change there's? Create the form like you normally would and then add the asp/php and upload to your serverserver and then email them the link to the form which they can fill in and then there is no issues. The db with their answer/answers can be in a separate db or even joint to the main one so that only 1 click rather will update x clients instead of 10 clicks being 10 clients or i could be set to do it every xminutes/hours.

Anyway i'll let Seahorse take over, some borderlands then bed i think besides im not a huge coder it just interests me.

  • 0

as Xoligy says

set up the html form on your webserver

send the clients a link

they click the link fill in the form and submit it

thats takes all responsibility on submitting stuff etc from them to your form

its the simplest and easiest way to do it

  • 0

Xoligy, you are right that I can use server side code with my form and then upload it to our local web server, the only problem is that our customers are external customers. They have no access to our intranet web server, therefore, it does not matter if I send them a link to the form, they won't be able to open it.

It's a good solution to use a public internet server to host the forms, th problem here is the cost and maintenance that I'm sure we have the budget for it.

  • 0

Cost is an issue in all businesses, and i guess it depends on how big your business is, how many forms you plan on running at the same time and if you see the solution saving time which is money and in this case i feel it would as for cost host + domain i say about ?20-50 a year should cover you, then you just need a page marker or a fully working website and sort out how your links are going to work with the forms.

Look at it this way, once you have a site, forms and a database there is no need to check emails and update records which im guessing is what someone spends alot of time doing over and over again its wasted time imo.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It's actually shocking how logs filling disks has been a constant issue going back for decades, yet we see very little improvement over the years. Even in the server world, its actually shockingly common for a server to either go totally down, or have a critical alert raised due to logs filling disks.
    • YouTube has finally brought back its DMs feature, but only in these countries by David Uzondu Late last year, YouTube started testing a "new" way to share videos directly with friends, without having to leave the app. Now, the video giant has announced that is now rolling out a revamped direct messaging inbox, which lets you share videos, Shorts, and live streams and have conversations about them, directly on YouTube. The platform limits this feature to 18+ users who are signed in to a verified channel and use the latest mobile app version. Direct messaging on YouTube first became a thing back in 2017 inside the mobile app (later renamed to "Messages"), where users could chat one-on-one and share clips directly, but all that came to an end on September 18, 2019, when Google decided to shut it down after giving users a month to download a .zip file archive of their past chats. No one really knows why YouTube killed the feature, but users were encouraged to migrate to the public Comments section, on Community tab posts, and via YouTube Stories. The previous incarnation suffered from moderation challenges, prompting Google to implement stricter safety guidelines and age verifications for this new iteration. Here's a list of the countries where the re-launched feature is currently available, though note that Brand Accounts do not have access to it, at least for now: Countries American Samoa Austria Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Guam Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Latvia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Northern Mariana Islands Norway Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Romania Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland U.S. Virgin Islands United Kingdom United States Before you can use the feature, you first have to send an invite link to your contact. Invite links expire exactly seven days after you create them. If the person on the other end accepts the invite, you can exchange videos directly and text back and forth inside the app. To delete a message, just long-press on the message and tap unsend to remove it for both users. You can also delete entire conversations by long-pressing the thread and selecting delete, but the other person will continue to see the chat history on their end. To make sure everything remains safe, YouTube monitors these messages to ensure they follow Community Guidelines.
    • The problem of course is simply that government does not always know best. My point is that agency is taken away from the EU consumer in these cases. I'm sorry, but I do not believe that governments (politicians) are inherently good, and "looking out for me." Primarily they look to themselves and their own personal desires first, foremost, and always. When the EU or the DOJ fines these companies, claiming to "represent the welfare of the consumer," how much of these billion-dollar judgments are handed to the consumers they claim to represent? Not even a dollar, as I've seen. Yet the EUC lawyers who are paid to sit around and dream up these suits make huge commissions on the fines the EUC adjudicates, which is an ironclad fact I hope everyone is aware of. It's also rank corruption, of course, but that's another topic. Last, when the EU inflicts these judgments, or the DOJ, take your pick, the costs are bundled right along in the cost of the goods and services these companies provide the consumers they are "looking out for." If you are someone who believes his government is his savior then you have my condolences. I think Apple is right here, because the whole scheme of consumer choice is that consumers pick and choose among the products companies offer. Microsoft Windows is more compatible with third party software and hardware than any desktop OS on Earth, which is my sole reason for choosing it. Just because the EUC forces companies do certain things it knows the companies do not want to do, "or else", has no bearing on consumer benefit. This Siri thing is almost idiotic it's so infantile. But this is what the EUC does when the EU in Brussels becomes cash-strapped and needs a big infusion of cash. Some people get upset by "big companies" but it's the opposite when governments dwarf the size and scope of these companies, which is so obvious it hurts.... I mean you can't honestly believe that forcing Apple to do things with Siri it has its own reasons to decline is something that "opens up" Apple, do you? Say it aint' so...
    • Looks like many years since the request was made, a directory tree view finally may be added. https://github.com/files-community/Files/pull/18537
    • Is it still super slow or has it improved on that area?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Tommi118 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      DragonOfMercy earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      bella52 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      210
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!