Recommended Posts

Desktop, hands down. With a Laptop, what you buy is what you get. You can't change the CPU or GPU at your leisure with a laptop. (Yes, you can in some cases, but the upgrade is poor in performance gain)

With a desktop, you get more RAM headroom, change your GPU and CPU as you like, and better cooling overall.

Yep' definitely go with desktop PC. To get a decent gaming laptop you'd have to buy some ridiculously priced models that aren't exactly easy to carry around. As Mindovermaster siad: Desktop PCs have more upgradable GPUs, CPUs, RAMs, HDD expansion, cooling... And the same/way higher specs for the price of a laptop as well.

Well, looks like I'll be staying in the Desktop world. Still, I'm going to

need something small form factor. Portability is a huge need.

Depending on your usage needs, you could get a nice laptop for cheap. You can find a nice quality Lenovo for around $500. Or if you just need something portable to access the internet/media, then a tablet would work. Obviously there's the iPad, or you could wait a month and see how the MS Surface pans out.

I just built a desktop gaming PC for a really considerable price range. If you need it for portability and have an extra 2 grand to throw away for the same specs, go laptop, if it will be dedicated gaming machine at home with a few lan party attendances, go desktop.

Check out the gaming pc I just built last week, its alot of fun too :)

Specs of build in my signature, cost was roughly $1200 for build

OopYQ.jpgsuYlb.jpg

Nope, this is a Gaming rig.

Ah ok, I thought you meant something portable to go along with your gaming rig.

I wouldn't necessarily go small form factor if you want a lot of power. You aren't going to be able to build something powerful and give it sufficient cooling if you want it in a small case. Cable management will be your worst enemy, even if you get a modular PSU. I'd suggest nothing smaller than a mid-size.

So I'm trying to decide between going with a new Desktop, or a gaming Laptop.

The big question, I think, comes down to video power.

What is the effective performance difference between the Desktop 680 GTX

and Laptop 680M?

I say about 20%, it's effectively a lower clocked 670.

It really does depend here... If you've got the money you can put together an awesome laptop but it will be heavier because of the GPU. But to me heavier isn't very bad on a backpack. So it's up to you. :) I know people who have alienware kit and are very happy with it.

Keep in mind that these days, that GPU would last a lot longer in the current climate than it would have done 5 years ago. Tech on that and CPU front isn't moving ahead as swiftly as it was before (mainly because games don't utilize their power).

Yea, I looked at Dell's gaming laptops. Also looked at Falcon NW.

The biggest setback for me on a laptop is screen size. I've really gotten

used to having a 24 or 27 inch display. And I gave laptops a LOT of

thought... just couldn't get past the screen.

As for mobility, I don't just do LAN parties, I also move around my

house quite a bit. Sometimes I'll stay in the living room for a week,

then the bedroom for another week, etc. A big ass tower is just a pain

to move all the time.

I've never bought anything from Falcon NW, and I realize they're on the expensive end,

but this setup looks pretty sweet. It's small, so easily portable, and seems to have the

bases covered for gaming on a single display.

Chassis

Tiki - Standard Black

Chassis Logo Insert

Gold Metal

Chassis Base

Granite - Absolute Black

Power Supply

450 Watt SFX

Motherboard

P8Z77-I Deluxe

Processor

Intel? Core? i7 3770K 3.5GHz

Processor Overclock

Processor Overlock - Tiki

Processor Cooler

Liquid Cooling - Tiki

Memory

Elite 1866MHz 16GB (2x8GB)

Video Card

GeForce GTX 680 (4GB)

Monitor

27" 1920x1080

Sound Card

On-Board Audio

Networking

On-Board Ethernet

Hard Drive

m4 SSD - 256GB

Optical Drive

Slot-Load DVD Writer

64-Bit Operating System

Windows 7 Ultimate (w/ upgrade)

Warranty

3 Year Warranty - Tiki

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
    • You could disable this "functionality/feature/whatever" with 2 registry keys, ages ago.
    • My Photos app is version 2026.11050.1001.0 and it remembers the window size and position. My Snipping Tool is version 11.2602.49.0 and it can capture the taskbar.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!