Insurance Prices


Recommended Posts

Ok so I got my Provisional in the post and my older brother is going to teach me to drive (10 years driving, no tickets, points or anything and he has done some advanced drivers course) and I am going to be using his car BUT he wants me to get my own insurance for the car and even for just 3rd party I am looking at paying nearly ?5,000 on his 2010 Ford Fiesta and I was wondering, is there ANYWHERE I can get it for a lot less than that in the United Kingdom otherwise I won't be able to afford to learn to drive.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1110221-insurance-prices/
Share on other sites

I used the first link and got a quote and the cheaper one (3rd party) was ?999.30 from Collingwood (?82.32 x 11, ?132.32 Deposit)

and the second most expensive was from Sabre for ?7178.09 which is also 3rd part (?674.74 x 10, ?1,435.62 Deposit) and I am not sure if this is a Scam or not... because there is like ?6,000 difference and the cheaper one gets me a Courtesy car, Windscreen Cover and for an extra ?10 Personal Accident cover) and the more expensive one doesn't give me anything but basic insurance so I am at a little loss for words I am that confused.

I just had a thought, if I was to get my dad to add my car when I get it and my name to his insurance policy (25 years no claims) and I just pay the extra It might work out cheaper but I have no idea how to work that one out XP.

Ok so I got my Provisional in the post and my older brother is going to teach me to drive (10 years driving, no tickets, points or anything and he has done some advanced drivers course) and I am going to be using his car BUT he wants me to get my own insurance for the car and even for just 3rd party I am looking at paying nearly ?5,000 on his 2010 Ford Fiesta and I was wondering, is there ANYWHERE I can get it for a lot less than that in the United Kingdom otherwise I won't be able to afford to learn to drive.

I don't think it's possible to have two policies on the same car. It's not practical either.

So, go to an insurance broker with your brother. Explain that it's his car and that he will be driving it most of the time and you're just going to be an occasional driver and you want a discounted rate because of that as you won't be driving it full time. Your name needs to be added to his policy. And you'll just pay your brother the difference between his current costs and the cost of your new policy.

It will be an order of magnitude cheaper than having your separate policy as a single primary driver.

I just had a thought, if I was to get my dad to add my car when I get it and my name to his insurance policy (25 years no claims) and I just pay the extra It might work out cheaper but I have no idea how to work that one out XP.

AFAIK this is actually illegal if you're the main driver. If you get insurance in your name, and add your dad as an additional driver that might reduce the cost, but your dad insuring it with you as an 'occasional driver' even though you will drive it more is wrong.

Having my wife on my insurance reduces it quite a lot even though she hardly ever drives my car. Play around a bit with adding additional drivers and see what difference that makes.

I'm assuming your a male under 20, if so your screwed for insurance at your age because your a guy. You won't get cheap insurance and forget fully comp. In hundreds somewhere around ?1000 would be considered the lowest most would go I would say. Quotes of between 1 and 2 grand will be the norm. Higher than that and they are basically just giving your the finger and don't want to insure you but are willing to play the game to see if you take the bait. Some won't even do that and will refuse to quote you.

You have to shop around but as I say cheap insurance isn't going to happen. If you can afford it try and have legal expenses included in the policy before a courtesy car. You can always figure something out at the time should you need a car but legal expenses are just that...expensive.

You can increase your voluntry excess at your own risk which could bring the premium down a bit but this is at your own risk as I say.

A lot of insurance companies offer something called Black Box insurance where they place a monitoring device in your car and monitor how you drive. This is a great way to lower your insurance for first time drivers. They also review it occasionally and depending on how you drive it may be reduced further.

Have you looked into this?

I did find what is called Learner Driver insurance which is cheap and they all say it is fine for my brother to have his own fully comp insurance for the car and if I crash while learning it wont effect his insurance but I can't do that if I am fully qualified. so yeah.

and that thing where I said add my car and my name to my dads insurance is obliviously out the window so yeah.

A lot of insurance companies offer something called Black Box insurance where they place a monitoring device in your car and monitor how you drive. This is a great way to lower your insurance for first time drivers. They also review it occasionally and depending on how you drive it may be reduced further.

Have you looked into this?

I didn't even know this existed I'll have to look at this.

I'm assuming your a male under 20, if so your screwed for insurance at your age because your a guy. You won't get cheap insurance and forget fully comp. In hundreds somewhere around ?1000 would be considered the lowest most would go I would say. Quotes of between 1 and 2 grand will be the norm. Higher than that and they are basically just giving your the finger and don't want to insure you but are willing to play the game to see if you take the bait. Some won't even do that and will refuse to quote you.

You have to shop around but as I say cheap insurance isn't going to happen. If you can afford it try and have legal expenses included in the policy before a courtesy car. You can always figure something out at the time should you need a car but legal expenses are just that...expensive.

You can increase your voluntry excess at your own risk which could bring the premium down a bit but this is at your own risk as I say.

I'm 21. I'm looking at prices for when I am fully qualified (I will also be doing the advanced courses) and their still in the thousands of pounds for 3rd party which is stupid.

You will sometimes find that 3rd party is more expensive than Fully Comp

I was 21 when i was learning only added about ?100 onto my dads policy to allow me to drive it

once i passed my test for me on my own it was ?900 fully comp on a 1996 1.4 VW Golf

also remember driving a car is a privilege not a necessity if you cant afford it then tough really

You will sometimes find that 3rd party is more expensive than Fully Comp

I was 21 when i was learning only added about ?100 onto my dads policy to allow me to drive it

once i passed my test for me on my own it was ?900 fully comp on a 1996 1.4 VW Golf

also remember driving a car is a privilege not a necessity if you cant afford it then tough really

True, although I have been looking into an IT Tech job and I kinda need a car for that as that is what I am qualified to do.

My dads insurance allows him to drive any car he likes as long as he has permission so I could talk to him about adding me to it and it should (I think?) allow the same for me as well so I could just pay him the extra that he would have to pay.

Holy crap, I would never want to drive if I lived over there... Deposits for insurance? I pay about $100 a month for my cars insurance and that is full coverage, meaning the max personal injury coverage, max car rental coverage, roadside assistance, accident coverage, gap insurance(means if I owe 26k on the car, and it is only worth 24k when it is totalled, the insurance still pays 26k), and weather insurance. Not sure what the real name for the weather insurance is but basically, since we get a lot of hail storms here, insurance will always cover it at no cost to me.

True, although I have been looking into an IT Tech job and I kinda need a car for that as that is what I am qualified to do.

My dads insurance allows him to drive any car he likes as long as he has permission so I could talk to him about adding me to it and it should (I think?) allow the same for me as well so I could just pay him the extra that he would have to pay.

just watch with that a lot of insurers wont allow you to drive other cars with permission until your 25, i know mine, mym parents and my sisters policies are all like this

you also cant do this to drive the car all the time if insurers know your doing this they will void your insurance in an accident

I'm 21. I'm looking at prices for when I am fully qualified (I will also be doing the advanced courses) and their still in the thousands of pounds for 3rd party which is stupid.

As I say, your a young male, the market will stereotype you and force you to pay silly money to drive and you do need to drive. It's extremely difficult to rely on UK public transport! There is no way around it I'm afraid, at the time I was learning (about 10 years ago) my dad phoned about 30-50 insurance companies as that's how he is and the best he could have for me was ?1200 3rd party on a Ford Ka....I was a week away from turning 18 when I passed. I did my pass plus immediately after passing which helps lower your premiums but after afew years it makes no difference. It gets better after 25 and I think your compulsory excess comes down as well at that point.

It's usually cheaper to go onto somebody's insurance as a named driver.

Go on comparethemarket.com and do a search. I've had three good deals with results from that site now. Insured with eCar, then Admiral and now I'm moving to Hastings Direct in a few days. Two years no claims and my insurance was literally three times what it is now when I started.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!