Intel/AMD - Nvidia/ATI Debate


Recommended Posts

Ok, so no posting in the debate. So I'll start this here.

I'm not interested in a flame/bashing war, just thought it was interesting how

far apart the CPU votes are, whereas the Video Card votes continue to stay

extremely close.

In the "old" days, you had Intel, AMD, Cyrix (?), etc... and the debates got

really heated about "bang for buck". Today, it's pretty much Intel's world.

But on the video card side... wow. There's still no real clear winner.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1110423-intelamd-nvidiaati-debate/
Share on other sites

Last time I helped a mate to buy a laptop, it was the only AMD that we could found here on Sheffield, it was an HP Envy with an A6-4455m, the laptop itself it's almost like a ultrabook, battery last, in words of him "all day"

What amazed me of this laptop though, it was that it could play Max Payne 3 (DX11 in low settings) quite fast, and by fast I mean above 30+ fps, there were no slowdowns. I think AMD pretty much has taken in the ultrabook experience competition by quite a lot.

This was the laptop: http://www8.hp.com/uk/en/products/laptops/product-detail.html?oid=5278389 (with cash back at currys they took of 150 pounds of the price)

I would personally like to see a good quality AMD-based motherboard with dual CPU that allows me to also use the GPU portion of the APU's in Crossfire mode. If they did that then they could really hurt Intel on a Price/Performance ratio even more than what they are doing now.

I think it really depends on what you are looking for in a video card. They all have their strengths and weaknesses.

nVidia tends to be very good with their proprietary drivers (on Windows, Linux, and FreeBSD), but the open-source nouveau graphics driver (integrated into the Linux kernel) is somewhat lacking in both features and hardware support (mostly due to nVidia's refusal to provide help or the necessary documentation from what I understand).

AMD is almost exactly the opposite of nVidia. Their proprietary graphics drivers are fairly descent on Windows, but are severely lacking on Linux. However, AMD has been supporting the development of the open-source Radeon graphics driver integrated into the Linux kernel. It is improving rapidly and already provides excellent performance, even on the latest hardware.

Intel's latest generation of GPUs actually provide descent performance for every-day use, although nowhere close to the power of their modern AMD and nVidia counterparts. Their main advantage is excellent driver support on both Windows and Linux. Their officially supported open-source drivers are integrated into the Linux kernel and support full 2D and 3D acceleration, power management, sleep, and generally perform very well.

Summary:

nVidia: Excellent if you need a powerful GPU with good proprietary drivers.

AMD: Excellent if you need a powerful GPU with good open-source drivers.

Intel: Excellent if you can sacrifice power for rock-solid stability.

Note: I only considered technical factors. While price is certainly a very important factor, it is constantly changing and completely unrelated to my general opinion of each manufacturer.

  • Like 2

Intel + NVIDIA FTMFT

Haven't touched AMD since Athlon 64 and dropped ATI 8 years ago when 2 GFX cards bonked out on me within a month (yes, I know 8 years is a long time to hold a grudge over a product, but first impressions are what counts)

I think it really depends on what you are looking for in a video card. They all have their strengths and weaknesses.

nVidia tends to be very good with their proprietary drivers (on Windows, Linux, and FreeBSD), but the open-source nouveau graphics driver (integrated into the Linux kernel) is somewhat lacking in both features and hardware support (mostly due to nVidia's refusal to provide help or the necessary documentation from what I understand).

AMD is almost exactly the opposite of nVidia. Their proprietary graphics drivers are fairly descent on Windows, but are severely lacking on Linux. However, AMD has been supporting the development of the open-source Radeon graphics driver integrated into the Linux kernel. It is improving rapidly and already provides excellent performance, even on the latest hardware.

Intel's latest generation of GPUs actually provide descent performance for every-day use, although nowhere close to the power of their modern AMD and nVidia counterparts. Their main advantage is excellent driver support on both Windows and Linux. Their officially supported open-source drivers are integrated into the Linux kernel and support full 2D and 3D acceleration, power management, sleep, and generally perform very well.

Summary:

nVidia: Excellent if you need a powerful GPU with good proprietary drivers.

AMD: Excellent if you need a powerful GPU with good open-source drivers.

Intel: Excellent if you can sacrifice power for rock-solid stability.

Note: I only considered technical factors. While price is certainly a very important factor, it is constantly changing and completely unrelated to my general opinion of each manufacturer.

I would concur about Nvidia should you want to dual boot- Linux and Windows- . Still has a box up and running with a Nvidia Ge-force 4 4000 64 mb video card that runs XP and Ubuntu 10.04.

Intel + NVIDIA FTMFT

Haven't touched AMD since Athlon 64 and dropped ATI 8 years ago when 2 GFX cards bonked out on me within a month (yes, I know 8 years is a long time to hold a grudge over a product, but first impressions are what counts)

Remember that ATi/AMD hasn't made their own cards in years. So odds are that what you bought were 3rd party made cards...which is what you get with nVidia as well.

So just because one vendor made some bad cards doesn't meant that ATi/AMD graphics cards are bad. I have certain vendors I won't buy cards from based on the reliability ratings I see at a few places. That goes for both ATi/AMD and nVidia.

I would concur about Nvidia should you want to dual boot- Linux and Windows- . Still has a box up and running with a Nvidia Ge-force 4 4000 64 mb video card that runs XP and Ubuntu 10.04.

I would actually say exactly the opposite. I would go with AMD in that case. I prioritize open-source drivers over proprietary drivers because they tend to support much older cards extremely well, have no ABI problems, and work on more than a few "blessed" architectures (namely i686 and AMD64, occasionally ARMv6/v7 as well).

Are you using the proprietary or open-source driver for your GeForce 4? As far as I know, the proprietary driver doesn't support it anymore (although Canonical may have an older version in the repository). Its likely that nouveau would get better performance with a card that old anyway.

I would actually say exactly the opposite. I would go with AMD in that case. I prioritize open-source drivers over proprietary drivers because they tend to support much older cards extremely well, have no ABI problems, and work on more than a few "blessed" architectures (namely i686 and AMD64, occasionally ARMv6/v7 as well).

Are you using the proprietary or open-source driver for your GeForce 4? As far as I know, the proprietary driver doesn't support it anymore (although Canonical may have an older version in the repository). Its likely that nouveau would get better performance with a card that old anyway.

The Geforce 4 MX4000 is an old card... DX7 open GL 1.2

actually the Nvidia drivers for the old work fine.

The Geforce 4 MX4000 is an old card... DX7 open GL 1.2

actually the Nvidia drivers for the old work fine.

This is what I get when I use aptitude to search for proprietary nVidia drivers on Ubuntu 12.04:


$ aptitude versions '^nvidia[-]([0-9]+$|current$)'
Package nvidia-173:
p 173.14.30-0ubuntu11 precise 500
p 173.14.35-0ubuntu0.2 precise-security,precise- 500

Package nvidia-173:i386:
p 173.14.30-0ubuntu11 precise 500
p 173.14.35-0ubuntu0.2 precise-security,precise- 500

Package nvidia-96:
p 96.43.20-0ubuntu6 precise 500

Package nvidia-96:i386:
p 96.43.20-0ubuntu6 precise 500

Package nvidia-current:
p 295.40-0ubuntu1 precise 500
p 295.40-0ubuntu1.1 precise-security,precise- 500

Package nvidia-current:i386:
p 295.40-0ubuntu1 precise 500
p 295.40-0ubuntu1.1 precise-security,precise- 500
[/CODE]

I'm guessing you are using version 96 or 173, probably not 295. Although it would be pretty cool if I'm wrong; that would prove nVidia has much better old hardware support on Linux than I thought. (Aptitude would show 'i' or 'v' instead of 'p' if you have the package installed.)

This is what I get when I use aptitude to search for proprietary nVidia drivers on Ubuntu 12.04:

$ aptitude versions '^nvidia[-]([0-9]+$|current$)'

Package nvidia-96:

p 96.43.20-0ubuntu6 precise 500

Package nvidia-96:i386:

p 96.43.20-0ubuntu6 precise 500

#sh NVIDIA-Linux-x86-96.43.20-pkg1.run[/CODE]

[/font][/color]

http://www.nvidia.co....20-driver.html

And should I decide to- that will even do the "compiz cube spin"

cube1.png

I don't use the new layout -- still love the old Gnome.

What is the best at the time of purchase.

I've owned both nvidia and Ati/amd video cards. Amd, and intel cpu systems. I figure out what I'm going to spend, look at both ati/nvidia cards in that price range, and buy the one that gives me the best performance (for what I'm wanting to spend).

I do the same thing with amd cpu's,however you reach a certain point that amd has no equivalent in terms of performance of the intel version on the higher end of the processors.

#sh NVIDIA-Linux-x86-96.43.20-pkg1.run[/CODE]

[/font][/color]

http://www.nvidia.co....20-driver.html

I see. So you are using a legacy proprietary driver, just not the one from the repository.

While downloading drivers and other software directly from the vendor's website is common practice on Windows, it is not recommend in most Linux distributions unless the software is not in the repository (and sometimes not even then). As you can see from your aptitude output, you can install nvidia-96 directly from the repository. (It is far less likely to cause breakage, will get updates with your other software, and will hook into DKMS properly.)

Despite the fact that you [i]can[/i] install an obsolete proprietary driver for your video card, you will likely get better performance with the open-source nouveau driver. While I don't have exactly the same card as you, I can verify that nouveau performs well on a GeForce 4 series card. However, there are a couple of packages that you will need to install so nouveau can get full 3D acceleration. Install [i]libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental[/i], [i]xserver-xorg-video-nouveau[/i], and [i]nouveau-firmware[/i] (if you're using Ubuntu or Linux Mint) or [i]firmware-linux-nonfree[/i] (if you're using Debian). Obviously, you will also need to remove the proprietary driver first so there are no driver conflicts.

I don't use the new layout -- still love the old Gnome.

If you really like GNOME 2, you should check out MATE. Basically, it is a project based on the last released version of GNOME 2, plus additional enhancements. Their goal is to continue development of GNOME 2 where the GNOME Project left off. Eventually, they plan to integrate GTK3 support and other newer technologies while still retaining the look-and-feel of GNOME 2.

Instead of sticking with Ubuntu 10.04 forever, you should consider upgrading to a newer version of Ubuntu (or another distribution). Your desktop environment preference doesn't have to hold back the rest of the software on your system. I installed Debian Wheezy on my laptop, selecting the XFCE desktop environment during the installation so a lightweight desktop environment would be installed with the default applications. Then, I added the contrib and non-free repositories and installed the proprietary firmware to make all of my hardware work. Finally, I added the MATE Debian repository to my [i]sources.list[/i] using the instructions in the MATE wiki and installed [i]mate-desktop-environment[/i] from the repository. After reboot, I selected MATE as my default desktop environment from the LightDM login manager and have been using it ever since.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Doogee and Ulefone regularly release phones with 10k-25k mAh batteries, but those are bricks. I don't understand how they could make it only weigh 220 grams with a battery that size.
    • Windows 10 quietly gets one more year of support and updates by Taras Buria Windows 10 reached its end of life at the end of 2025. Microsoft kicked off the Extended Security Updates program, aimed at giving regular consumers one more year of security-only updates. By doing so, Microsoft gave users more time and money to update their computers to a newer operating system or compatible hardware. Now, with the end of the Extended Security Updates program quickly approaching, Microsoft is making an important adjustment. Users discovered that the official support article for the program now lists a new end-of-support date: The Extended Security Updates program is not a new concept. It has been an official way for business consumers to continue receiving critical updates for unsupported Microsoft products for many years. However, all this time, it was a business-only, paid feature. With Windows 10, Microsoft brought ESU to regular consumers, allowing them to get security updates for Windows 10 past October 2025 essentially for free. When Windows 10 was approaching the end of support, many guessed that Microsoft might adjust its support timelines, and this is exactly what seems to be happening. Of course, Microsoft would love everyone to switch to new computers, such as its latest Surface devices, but in the days of ever-growing hardware prices, not everyone is lucky enough to have money for a new PC. Leaving hundreds of millions of customers with a Windows version that no longer receives security updates is a major risk that Microsoft is not willing to take. If you have a Windows 10 PC to enroll in the Extended Security Updates program, check out this guide to learn how to do so.
    • Sony announces Bungie layoffs that will affect "significant number of employees" by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Sony today announced that major layoffs are happening at its first-party studio Bungie, the developer that has spawned series like Halo, Destiny, and Marathon over the past decades. The news arrives just weeks after Bungie delivered the final update to Destiny 2, and it's that team being hit with the layoffs the most. CEO of Sony Interactive Entertainment Hermen Hulst revealed the staff reduction today, calling it "painful news." "Over the past several months, together with Bungie leadership, we reviewed the studio’s long-term direction, development priorities, resource needs, and role within our broader portfolio strategy," said Hulst, explaining the decision. "We explored multiple alternatives before concluding that a reduction was necessary to align the studio’s resources with its current priorities and long-term goals." The layoffs will be hitting "a significant number of employees" across most of the Destiny franchise development team. It doesn't look like Sony is planning to continue the series following Destiny 2's sunsetting update. The studio is said to be in early stages of looking at other projects to pivot to, but it's said that keeping the size of the team at current levels is no longer feasible. "We know this decision has a profound impact on the people affected, their families, friends, and teammates," said Bungie leadership in a separate message on social media. "While these changes are necessary to best position the studio now and for the future, that does not lessen the difficulty of this moment or the impact it has on those affected." At the same time, "some" of the Marathon development team are also affected by the layoffs. The recently released multiplayer-only extraction shooter title hasn't seen a big boom of players either, but the company is reportedly hoping that the live service experience will pick up players with future updates.
    • Microsoft adds reusable skills and finance data connectors to Copilot in Excel by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft is giving Copilot in Excel a collection of new features aimed squarely at finance teams. The update introduces reusable instructions for common tasks, connections to services such as FactSet and Morningstar, and a better way to review what Copilot intends to do before it starts changing a workbook. The most interesting addition is 'Skills' finally coming to Copilot in Excel. Skills let companies teach Copilot how to handle a recurring process, so employees do not need to write the same detailed prompt every month. Users can create skills that can specify the steps Copilot should follow, along with the required layout, formulas, and formatting. Microsoft says users can create their own skills by saving a SKILL.md file in OneDrive. The file is written using Markdown and tells Copilot when and how to perform the task. Once it is available, a user can select the skill in the Copilot pane or mention it in a prompt using the @ symbol. There is also a library of prebuilt finance skills for customers who do not want to create their own. Microsoft plans to let developers distribute additional skills through the Microsoft Marketplace and the Microsoft 365 Admin Center, with LSEG, Ramp, Rogo, samaya.ai, Velixo, and Vena among the first partners involved. The company says that it is also expanding the external data that Copilot can access from inside Excel. New connectors are being added for CB Insights, Daloopa, FactSet, Morningstar, PitchBook, and S&P Global data through technology developed by Kensho. There is a catch, however. Accessing these services may require a separate subscription from the relevant data provider, so a Microsoft 365 Copilot licence will not necessarily unlock all of them. FactSet is also only available in preview for now, with general availability planned for July. Microsoft is also trying to make Copilot’s workbook edits easier to inspect. Users can switch to a planning mode that shows which sheets, cell ranges, formulas, and assumptions Copilot intends to work with before it begins making changes. Once the work is complete, the Show Changes pane can distinguish edits made by Copilot from those made by human collaborators. The update continues Microsoft’s push to turn Excel Copilot from a chatbot into an agent that can carry out longer tasks. The company previously added an Agent Mode capable of planning and completing multi-step Excel work. Microsoft also recently acquired financial AI startup Fintool, another indication that finance is becoming a key target for its Excel AI strategy. Prebuilt skills, personalization, workbook rules, external connectors, planning mode, and Copilot attribution in Show Changes are generally available to Microsoft 365 Copilot customers using Excel on the web, Windows, and macOS. Custom skills are initially available to Microsoft 365 Insiders on Windows and Mac starting today. Microsoft plans to make them generally available across Windows, Mac, and the web over the next month. Partner-built skills are expected during the third quarter of the year. Availability may still differ depending on region and licensing.
    • Exactly. They serve different (although related) purposes.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      438
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Xenon
      77
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!