Astra.Xtreme, on 11 October 2012 - 00:17, said:
Unless they have some doping test results to show, this still proves nothing. "Testimonies" from a group of people isn't evidence. I could get a group of people to all blame a random person for murder, but it isn't going to get them prosecuted without actual proof.
They have been hounding Armstrong for damn near a decade, and have never had a single bit of proof against him. Either provide some proof, or leave the guy alone.
The problem is the tests can't keep up with the dopers, these are designer drugs made to beat the tests. When you know how the tests work, you can figure out how to beat them.
I don't know (or care) if he did it or not, but it seems strange in a sport dominated by dopers that the one guys who claims he didn't/doesn't/never has, to beat them over and over again. I'm not saying it's not possible, just that it's strange for a completely healthy biker to have to dope to win, but a cancer patient doesn't?