Jump to content



Photo

  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 compl3x

compl3x

    One day until retirement

  • 7,277 posts
  • Joined: 06-December 09
  • Location: Melbourne, Australia
  • OS: Windows 7
  • Phone: Samsung Galaxy S4

Posted 13 October 2012 - 13:51

Posted Image


Metro: Last Light will no longer include a multiplayer component when it launches early next year, developer 4A Games announced today on the game's official blog. Multiplayer had previously been revealed soon after the game's 2011 announcement, something the blog notes was "probably a mistake."

"Throughout the development of Metro: Last Light a small, dedicated team had been working on a number of multiplayer prototypes," the entry reads. "After E3, we decided to fold this multiplayer team back into the main group and focus 100% of the studio's resources on the single player campaign. As a result, Metro: Last Light will not ship with a multiplayer component." 4A Games believes that the game's single-player campaign is "what the fanbase cares about the most."

Whether multiplayer will be added post-launch as DLC or an update is uncertain. "Right now we're 100% focused on the single player campaign and not thinking beyond that. We don't like throwing away work though, it's a project we could potentially return to after Metro: Last Light ships."



http://www.joystiq.c...ng-resources-on


Bueno! Screw tacked on MP.


#2 ahhell

ahhell

    Neowinian Senior

  • 8,896 posts
  • Joined: 30-June 03
  • Location: Winnipeg - coldest place on Earth - yeah

Posted 13 October 2012 - 13:56

Right on!

#3 Detection

Detection

    Detecting stuff...

  • 8,369 posts
  • Joined: 30-October 10
  • Location: UK
  • OS: 7 SP1 x64

Posted 13 October 2012 - 14:04

Good move, a game like Metro is better as a SP game imo, can't imagine it being all that much fun as MP

#4 Yusuf M.

Yusuf M.

  • 21,274 posts
  • Joined: 25-May 04
  • Location: Toronto, ON
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Nexus 5 (Android 4.4.2)

Posted 13 October 2012 - 14:16

I'm glad they did this. There's no need for multi-player in a game that focuses so much on the single-player experience.

#5 The Laughing Man

The Laughing Man

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,964 posts
  • Joined: 18-May 03
  • Location: Kyoto, Japan

Posted 13 October 2012 - 14:25

Thats one smart team of devs they have there.

#6 Reacon

Reacon

    [VGW] Woohoo!

  • 3,802 posts
  • Joined: 12-May 08
  • Location: Katabatic
  • OS: Win 7 & Slackware

Posted 13 October 2012 - 14:51

It's like Mass Effect 3. Nobody is going to buy it for the multiplayer if it's not CoD, BF, CS, etc.

I'm just glad they realised that and didn't end up forcing their players to play it to complete the game.

#7 notchinese

notchinese

    Neowinian

  • 390 posts
  • Joined: 04-October 12

Posted 13 October 2012 - 14:55

I actually support this because assuming the gameplay is similar to the previous game, I wouldn't have any interest in a multiplayer aspect.

#8 McKay

McKay

    Grossly Incandescent.

  • 5,340 posts
  • Joined: 29-August 10
  • Location: 308 Negra Arroyo Lane
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Galaxy Note 3

Posted 13 October 2012 - 14:59

I actually support this because assuming the gameplay is similar to the previous game, I wouldn't have any interest in a multiplayer aspect.


While it shouldn't have been a key component, it could have been a cool optional extra, such as you play a Metro Guard, in a small team defending the a Metro entrance from various waves of enemies.

#9 TPreston

TPreston

    Neowinian Senior

  • 2,282 posts
  • Joined: 18-July 12
  • Location: Ireland
  • OS: Windows Embedded Standard 8 & Server 2012/08 Datacenter
  • Phone: Nokia Lumia 920

Posted 13 October 2012 - 15:39

I hope there will be more stealth scenes.

The best parts of the first game were the stealth parts like hole station, the bandit stations and the front line.

Good riddance to a needless repetitive multiplayer mode

#10 ViperAFK

ViperAFK

    Neowinian Senior

  • 10,700 posts
  • Joined: 07-March 06
  • Location: Vermont

Posted 13 October 2012 - 15:52

Good, I couldn't have cared less about metro multiplayer, I like it for the singleplayer, glad they are focusing on that.

#11 ahhell

ahhell

    Neowinian Senior

  • 8,896 posts
  • Joined: 30-June 03
  • Location: Winnipeg - coldest place on Earth - yeah

Posted 13 October 2012 - 17:27

While it shouldn't have been a key component, it could have been a cool optional extra, such as you play a Metro Guard, in a small team defending the a Metro entrance from various waves of enemies.

Did you even read the OP? You want them to do exactly what they said they didn't want to do. Ok.

#12 +Phouchg

Phouchg

    Random Oracle

  • 5,172 posts
  • Joined: 28-March 11
  • Location: Krikkit
  • OS: VTOS 6.1.7601 x64

Posted 13 October 2012 - 18:24

And there you have "single player is dead"... there are sensible developers still. Wonder what THQ management thinks about it, though.

#13 theyarecomingforyou

theyarecomingforyou

    Tiger Trainer

  • 15,464 posts
  • Joined: 07-August 03
  • Location: Terra Prime Profession: Jaded Sceptic
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Galaxy Note 3 with Galaxy Gear

Posted 13 October 2012 - 18:29

It annoys me that the announced reason for the delay to next year was the addition of multiplayer and now it turns out it won't be included at all. They should have been honest about the reason for the delay and this makes the studio look incompetent.

That said, I am still very much looking forward to Metro: Last Light. I thought that Metro 2033 was an excellent game and the early gameplay video they put out for the sequel looked great.



Click here to login or here to register to remove this ad, it's free!