Recommended Posts

I missed the keynote and read on the website about this fusion drive (apple never seem to give much details apart from that it will make the imac better) but it doesn't actually say if its a software or hardware thing, I have an SSD in my imac which a hard drive is it something I can make OS X use in an update? (probably not as this is apple we are talking about) just curious

Matt.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1114299-someone-explain-fusion-drive/
Share on other sites

it combines an SSD + HDD (128GB SSD + up to 1TB HDD) in software to present one drive.

Basically, what PC's have had for months via either motherboard support (combine say, a 32GB SSD with your hard drive) or via hybrid HDD's that have 8MB or so of flash on them. Nothing new here, but Apple brought it to you first apparently!

Nothing new here, but Apple brought it to you first apparently!

Ohhhhh, I never actually knew this existed before and actually thought Apple made this haha! wooow. so i guess its not something I can do with my imac i got now which has ssd and hard drive? i guess they probably updated the motherboard to support it meh!

it combines an SSD + HDD (128GB SSD + up to 1TB HDD) in software to present one drive.

Basically, what PC's have had for months via either motherboard support (combine say, a 32GB SSD with your hard drive) or via hybrid HDD's that have 8MB or so of flash on them. Nothing new here, but Apple brought it to you first apparently!

Since when did they say they were the first?...

Since when did they say they were the first?...

SuperKid implied it's the first he/she heard of it

SirEvan stated it was not new technology and has been around for some time and acknowledged that it appears brought it to SuperKid's attention first not so much that they released it first or ever claimed to do so

I could be mistaken but yeah we'll soon find out

it combines an SSD + HDD (128GB SSD + up to 1TB HDD) in software to present one drive.

Basically, what PC's have had for months via either motherboard support (combine say, a 32GB SSD with your hard drive) or via hybrid HDD's that have 8MB or so of flash on them. Nothing new here, but Apple brought it to you first apparently!

Ars reckons that it's more like Automatic Tiering than a caching solution.

  • Like 2

http://www.newegg.co...top-Hard-Drives

One of those. Just higher capacities.

Not really. It isn't an SSD cache tied to a hard drive. The OS sees an SSD and a hard drive as separate units. It manages what goes on which drive at the OS level. OS and frequently used files/apps get moved onto the SSD (and deleted from the hard drive), and files/apps that are used less frequently get moved to the hard drive (and deleted from the SSD).

Apparently also all disk write operations go first to the SSD, and then get transferred to the HDD as time allows. That's more like the caching that happens in a hybrid drive.

To be clear, this is not a caching concept, at least not in the current use of the word. Cache would imply that the data on the SSD is duplicated, and it's not. If you have a 1TB mechanical drive paired with the 128GB SSD, you have a 1.12 TB storage platform.

http://www.macobserv...n-drive-details

it combines an SSD + HDD (128GB SSD + up to 1TB HDD) in software to present one drive.

128 GB SSD + up to 3 TB HDD actually.

Basically, what PC's have had for months via either motherboard support (combine say, a 32GB SSD with your hard drive) or via hybrid HDD's that have 8MB or so of flash on them. Nothing new here, but Apple brought it to you first apparently!

A friend of mine has one of those hybrid HDDs (in his MacBook Pro FYI) and they simply cache frequently accessed files. The Fusion drive doesn't do that.

http://www.macrumors...l-hybrid-drive/

http://en.wikipedia....rage_management and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automated_Tiered_Storage

That's what you are looking at, executed by the file system, not at a block level.

EDIT::

It's different from caching and hybrid drives technically, but in terms of what the user sees it ought be pretty similar.

Sounds like RAID0

It's not RAID.

http://www.macobserv..._medium=twitter

It's basically just a 128 GB SSD + 1-3 TB HDD with a software layer on top that presents both drives as one to the user. Disk Utility will actually show you to separate drives. OS X dynamically moves frequently accessed files from one drive to the other without the user knowing. Once again, it's not the caching system you see in Hybrid Drives. Files are actually being moved from HDD to SSD or vice versa.

  • Like 2

Since when did they say they were the first?...

Was a jab at apple hyping new features all the time that other devices already have.

And Superkid, if you want something similar, you can get a hybrid drive. Not quite the same, but they're supposed to increase performance over regular HDD's by around 3x. Some PC motherboards allow you to use an SSD to do something similar, where they'll cache frequently used files on an SSD, to improve the responsiveness of the system.

http://www.anandtech...79-pro-review/4

Users of Intel?s Z68 Smart Response Technology that were dismayed when SRT was not a part of the X79 specifications will be overjoyed to see something similar to Intel?s operation on ASUS? X79 range. By placing two compatible drives (typically a mechanical HDD and a formatted SSD) in the appropriate SATA ports, the software and hardware implementation will let the SSD act as a cache, in order to improve loading times to the mechanical HDD, just like Intel?s RST

http://www.intel.com...technology.html

Intel? Smart Response Technology2 is a feature of Intel Rapid Storage Technology that enables a lower-cost, small-capacity SSD to be used in conjunction with a high-capacity hard disk drive. The combination results in a high-performance, cost-effective storage solution. You still have access to the storage capacity you need to store your movies, games, and other disk-intensive retrieval applications, but now you don?t have to sacrifice speed.
  • Faster boot times
  • 2x faster game launches3,4
  • 2x faster storage I/O performance3,5
  • Quick access to your favorite files

Was a jab at apple hyping new features all the time that other devices already have.

It's a new feature for them, so of course they are going to be enthusiastic about it. It's no different than any other products' marketing with new features.

The misconception that Apple claims they are first to the punch on every feature is getting pretty stale...

Ars and a couple of other outlets suggest it is some sort of pinning - basically frequently used stuff is moved from disk to nand memory, whereas the unused stuff gets moved to disk. Caching keeps a copy of the data on both disk and nand memory whereas this one actually moves the files around.

http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2012/10/apple-fusion-drive-wait-what-how-does-this-work/

Either way, no technical data is available hence no one is sure

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I am not a US citizen nor a Trump fan. Respect to both left and right. But I will, for the sake of fun, predict something for my own. There will come a day when the US and China will collide like titans ( over Taiwan or anything else ). Then, on that day, some people in this comment section will realize how good an idea it was to become independent in areas like that. ( Or atleast try )
    • Microsoft Edge gets tons of security features, including AI model that can see your screen by Usama Jawad Microsoft Edge may not be the most popular browser out there, but it does receive quite frequent updates that sometimes bring surprising new features and axe others that are not as popular. Now, Microsoft has detailed some of the new security enhancements that it has introduced in Edge for Business, typically used by commercial customers. Microsoft has emphasized that security features are baked into Edge for Business and offer native integration with security and governance tools like Defender and Purview. Browser sessions are governed by default on managed devices but can also be governed through dedicated work profiles on unmanaged devices. An important aspect in this area is controlling the use of shadow AI. We have talked about this before, but it essentially restricts employees from using unsanctioned AI apps through data loss prevention (DLP) policies, with Edge redirecting them to trusted AI services like Microsoft 365 Copilot. This feature, available as a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) license, ensures that confidential data never exits AI boundaries set by your organization in Purview. Additionally, Microsoft also has strong DLP policies for contractors. Contractors leveraging a Entra ID-joined work profile provisioned by their contracting company on a device managed by their actual employer can be restricted from downloading files locally. In such scenarios, the file is saved on the contracting firm's OneDrive rather than being downloaded locally. Another useful Edge security feature disallows copying and pasting from unmanaged locations and apps. Similarly, DLP policies can be configured at a granular level to restrict screenshots or downloading of files from certain locations. In the same vein, IT admins can block the installation of extensions, hosted apps, themes and scripts, and control if users can install extensions from external locations. They can also enable the installation of specific extensions and allow users to request access to certain extensions, so that they can be managed on a case-by-case basis. Finally, Edge for Business now has an on-device AI model that uses computer vision to see what's on your screen and block potentially malicious content immediately. This does not rely on site reputation, as it simply monitors what is being displayed on your screen, which means that it is effective against malicious content that takes over your screen and employs scareware tactics. Since this is an on-device AI model, it does use your system's resources, so it's enabled by default only on devices with at least 2GB of RAM and four CPU cores. You can find more details in the Microsoft Mechanics video here.
    • Could you come up with a slightly less depressing background for Tux instead of that gray gradient? Doesn't have to be cheerful, just less of a downer...
    • Linux 7.2's first release candidate gets off to a good start by Paul Hill Credit: Larry Ewing It has been a few weeks since the release of Linux 7.1, and in that time, the Linux 7.2 merge window has been open, where developers can submit their features and patches ready for the upcoming release. That window is now shut, and the release candidate phase has begun so that new features can be tested and further fixes applied. According to the founder of Linux, Linus Torvalds, this week’s release candidate looks “reasonably normal”. Although we are super early in the release candidates, this is a good sign as it makes it more likely that an eighth release candidate will not be needed. Torvalds even mentioned that the update’s stats are only larger than they really are because there was another AMD header drop with a third of the patch just being AMD GPU register definitions, which aren’t big changes but make the code contributed look larger overall. In addition to this, he noted that just over half the patch is drivers, even when excluding the AMD register dump. The rest of the changes are spread out over architecture updates, tooling, documentation, and core kernel updates. In the next week, Torvalds says that he will be chilling out, taking the week “mostly off”. Despite this, he will be reading emails and keeping up with things, so if he is slow responding, now you know why. He said he is hoping for a calm week, but we will just have to see if the second release candidate is actually like that. We should expect seven or eight release candidates before Linux 7.2 is released, so expect it around the end of August. If you missed it a few weeks ago, be sure to check out our coverage of Linux 7.1's release.
    • Ridiculous claim that the labor cost difference of $6000 annually would increase cost per phone by $200. The employees produce 3 phones per month or what?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Zeynel earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      JKR earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dedicated
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      248
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      86
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!