• 0

WebRequest and WebResponse has issues


Question

WebRequest and WebResponse has issues

I wrote a C# program that uses WebRequest and WebResponse to perform a simple web crawler. I discovered something about web sites. Web browsers such as IE and FireFox offer the capacity to view the HTML source code. But it seems that html code that is sent to the browser is one thing and what the browser interprets and displays is something else. For example, if you run a google search in IE and run the same google search in FireFox, the content that you can see when you view the source in IE will NOT have the hyperlinks and content from the search results, but you can see the html hyperlinks and content from the search results when you view the source in FireFox. So my question is this. How do you specialise the WebRequest and WebResponse to show the content after it is processed by the browser instead of before?

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

It's not an 'issue', it's by design. It's not the responsibility of WebRequest/WebResponse to execute client-side scripts, no content loaded by XHR requests will be returned, just the original HTML document. I believe if you want to return the HTML after it's been modified by a client-side script you would need to use a full web browser control rather than a WebRequest.

  • 0

I think I will have to use the WebBrowser class instead.

How do I expose the LoadCompleted method in the WebBrowser class in WPF C#?

I am trying to write a C# program in wpf that retrieves the content of a web page.

The first thing I tried was to try the WebRequest and WebResponse classes. This did not provide the actual displayed content. WebResponse reveils the HTML code that is sent to the browser. But I discovered that, while the page is being loaded by the browser, javascript can change what content is finally displayed in the browser.

So I decided to use the WebBrowser class.

Immediately I found that there are two WebBrowser classes. Thee is the one that is documented for WinForms and there is another that is documented for WPF. I need to understand the one documented for WPF. What I think I neeed to know what to do is to retrieve code after the "LoadCompleted" method is caused. But I do not know how to this and I cannot find any example demonstrating how this is done.

  • 0

In whatever class you're hosting the control in (Page, Window, etc) you need to add a handler. You can either put it in the class's initialization routine as

myBrowser.LoadCompleted += WebBrowser_LoadCompleted

or put it in the XAML in the WebBrowser declaration.

<WebBrowser Name="myBrowser" LoadCompleted="WebBrowser_LoadCompleted"/>

  • 0

I am getting close to solving this and having a working bit of code. As things stand right now, the call back function for LoadCompleted is not called with the code is stepped through.

Why doesn't this call back function get called?

Basically here is the code surrounding the declaratoini callback method:

webbrowser1 = new WebBrowser();
webbrowser1.LoadCompleted +=webbrowser1_LoadCompleted;
webbrowser1.Navigate(new Uri([url="http://www.google.com"]http://www.google.com[/url]"));

Should there be something more or are they in the wrong order?

The method, webbrowser1_LoadCompleted, is never called. I have put breakpoints in the callback method and the running program never reaches this method:

		 void webbrowser1_LoadCompleted(object sender, NavigationEventArgs e)
		{
			.
			.
			.
		}

I must be missing a reference. I do not know what one I am missing. Can you offer a suggestion?

By the way, that block above is placed there by the editor on this forum, it is not how my code actually looks like

  • 0

I tested it with the following:


WebBrowser b = new WebBrowser();
b.Loaded += b_Loaded;
b.Navigated += b_Navigated;
b.LoadCompleted += b_LoadCompleted;
b.Navigate(http://microsoft.com);
[/CODE]

It seems to fire those three events in that order: Loaded, Navigated, then LoadCompleted. LoadCompleted doesn't fire until the entire page's content is completely downloaded.

Yeah, the code tags are dumb. There should be quotes around the Uri string.

  • 0

I tested it with the following:


WebBrowser b = new WebBrowser();
b.Loaded += b_Loaded;
b.Navigated += b_Navigated;
b.LoadCompleted += b_LoadCompleted;
b.Navigate(http://microsoft.com);
[/CODE]

It seems to fire those three events in that order: Loaded, Navigated, then LoadCompleted. LoadCompleted doesn't fire until the entire page's content is completely downloaded.

Yeah, the code tags are dumb. There should be quotes around the Uri string.

I am close. It works but, at the same time it does not completly come through. When I use a google search page as a test. all the methods you mention are called, but the HTMLDocument I extract when these methods are fired contain the HTML from the home page of google.

Also, if I put breakpoints on these methods, at watch the output to see if the WebBroswer class loads the google results page, it does not. The page is blank until the program is idle.

What do you think?

  • 0

If I am not mistaken it is because google uses ajax to load div content to show the results as you type and the load completed just will pull the html document that was originally loaded. If I use ajax requests and they change div content and then go to view source in any browser it will just show my original document.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are they on crack at M$? Surely living on an alternative reality? A good dump of mine would run faster down the toilet if I did not flush it. But still looks better than this pile of slop. By the way, did they also comment on what's the next "functionality added"? Maybe you can improve it if you add even more stuff to this vomitware.
    • I don't find them "bitchy" or "whiny". I think the term you should use it, uhm, "passionate."
    • Ahh, I didn't know that. It makes sense. I was thinking I would be fine with 50 hours, but 100 is close enough that I wouldn't feel like I am paying for more than I am using. I might check it out sometime.
    • Google's next-gen Tensor AI chips might be produced by Samsung, report says by Hamid Ganji Image via Google Google’s Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) is produced in collaboration with companies such as Broadcom and TSMC, but a recent report suggests that the search giant is in talks with Samsung to hand over part of the production to the Korean tech company. According to a report by The Information, citing people familiar with the matter, Google has begun talks with Samsung about using its chip manufacturing capacity for the next generation of Tensor AI chips. Google’s upcoming TPUs are reportedly codenamed “Icefish” and will be produced using Samsung's 2-nanometer process technology. Meanwhile, Samsung is expected to produce only a portion of the next-generation Tensor chips, with most of the production remaining at TSMC. The Information says the new Tensor chips are currently in the design stage and are scheduled to enter mass production in 2028. TSMC is generally considered one of the most reliable chip manufacturing partners and is trusted by tech giants such as Apple and Google. However, the growing demand for TSMC’s AI chips, combined with the company’s focus on meeting demand from AI data centers, has reportedly prompted Google to seek additional manufacturing partners for its next-generation TPUs. Besides Samsung and TSMC, Intel could also be assigned part of the production. The Information reported this week is that Google has begun talks with Intel to produce up to three million TPUs in 2028. However, this is not the first time Google has partnered with Samsung on chip production, as Samsung has previously manufactured Tensor chips for Pixel smartphones. Google’s Tensor Processing Unit is used in cloud data centers and competes with NVIDIA’s chips, which currently dominate the market. By relying on in-house chips, Google can not only reduce its dependence on third-party providers but also create new revenue opportunities. The company has already supplied its TPUs to the AI firm Anthropic.
    • Reminder that the Premium and Ultimate plans already come with a 100 hour per month limit, which you then have to pay more to increase in 15 hour blocks.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Tommi118 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      488
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      196
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!