Recommended Posts

I am interested in talking to people who have Satellite internet. I live in a remote area, This became the only way. I went with TooWay Direct. The company have been brilliant so far.

Although I cant seem to Port Forward anything at the minute. I am going to contact the support tomorrow because I have tried it with RDP and FTP. Not sure if they block those ports or whatever. Its a bit of a bummer if they do, Any suggestions if they do? I am thinking Team Viewer to connect back to home when I am at work.

I know the latency is high on Satellite connections thats just what it is and shouldn't cause me too many issues. But so far I am impressed with the speeds. I am getting 18 - 19 Mbits rather than crappy ADSL barely 1Mbps.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1114827-satellite-internet-tooway/
Share on other sites

You sure your just not natted - what is your routers wan/internet IP? I thought many sat companies don't allow any forwards because they are natted?

Are you on the tooway business or home setup - I thought with business you got public, but home private?

http://www.bentley-w...ay_business.php

Notice the pubic IP listing in the package. But in home - nothing mentioned

http://www.bentley-w...tooway_home.php

Yeah it looks like there is some Natting going on, I have an external IP of 130.xx.xx.xx and the modem has a management IP of 192.168.100.1 I have it connected to the Untrust Port on a Juniper which Nat's to a local subnet of 192.168.1.xx Maybe If I changed the subnet to 192.168.100.xx then I could get away with it.

I think your right, On the pro you get some public IP's I am on the home. I might get them to change it.

many modems use that 192.168.100.1 address as management, my cable modem does for example. But 130.x.x.x is not private - if that your external you should be good to go.

Send yourself some traffic using say canyouseeme.org and do you see it on the external interfrace of your juniper?

Where are you seeing that 130 address? On the juni itself or using some website like whatsmyip ? If you have 130 on the juni itself doesn't seem like your behind a ISP nat, atleast not one using non routable private IPs

Yeah the 130 address is registered to the ISP, I get that. I think there is some kind of ISP trickery going on here because I have a rule for RDP and I have checked it with Canyouseeme and it comes back with Connection timed out.

I will see what their support have to say. It might be a case of I have to switch to Pro to get an external IP and then map it directly to my server.

"Yeah the 130 address is registered to the ISP"

What?? No is the 130.x.x.x on your JUNI? your juni is set to get dhcp address on this interface? Where are you seeing that your address starts with 130?

"Yeah the 130 address is registered to the ISP"

What?? No is the 130.x.x.x on your JUNI? your juni is set to get dhcp address on this interface? Where are you seeing that your address starts with 130?

The Untrust Interface is set to DHCP Client, Thats where it gets the 130.xx address i.e the Public Internet Address. Thats why I cant understand why my port forwarding wont work. Everything else works fine apart from my port forwarding.

It is possible that they are port blocking even on a Public IP.

Try on a non-standard port.

With the Untrusted port coming out the ISP supplied Juniper modem, is that going directly into your PC on on your own router?

Maybe it is an issue with your own router if you are using it? Try DMZ for testing purposes (with your Windows Firewall enabled) to see if it's your router doing it?

Maybe look at other solutions that don't need port forwards depending on what you are trying to do... VPS, VPN, LogMeIn, etc.

How are you checking that the port forward is not working? I would actually sniff at the pubic interface of the juni that has the 130 address - and generate traffic there via canyouseeme.org to some odd ports -- do you see the traffic? If not then yeah the isp is blocking unsolicited traffic to your public IP

If your wanting to see the traffic past the juni, maybe either your forward is not correct or ip your sending it to is blocking, etc. Sniff the traffic at your public interface to be sure they are not allowing the traffic to you.

Yeah I got some people on the outside to test it and then I checked the logs on the rule I created and I just see nothing, No connection attempts been made at all. I have E-Mailed the support asking them about it. I have a funny suspicion this is not allowed on Home but is on Pro or at least on Pro you get some Public (Static) IP's that I could use however I saw fit. I do know that HTTP traffic is passed through a kind of upstream proxy that strips out headers and other useless information and does some fancy compression or something so Webpages are delivered quicker. I suspect that other traffic is filtered too.

checking logs on a rule does not always tell you the whole picture.

I would do a ff (flow filter) and look for the dst IP (yours) to the port they are creating traffic to.

But from the website I don't think home connections can do inbound unsolicited traffic -- update to pro package if you need inbound.

no what juni do you have? You should be able to do a flow filter on it and see the actual traffic on the interface. Possible traffic is not reaching your rule that your logging which is why you don't see anything in that rules logs.

Do you have a specific deny rule added for logging - you could look there, but by default on junipers default deny is not logged.

no what juni do you have? You should be able to do a flow filter on it and see the actual traffic on the interface. Possible traffic is not reaching your rule that your logging which is why you don't see anything in that rules logs.

Do you have a specific deny rule added for logging - you could look there, but by default on junipers default deny is not logged.

Yeah I know you have to turn Logging on hehe :-p Not familiar with Flow Filer. Will look at this.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!