• 0

.co.uk domain only for UK business


Question

I have been thinking about starting a small web design business for years, but have never got around to it. I do alot of freelance work, and often work on sites like freelancer. I sometimes make decent money and its always steady income which is great for me at the moment with no full time job.

However, I want to set up my own website to serve as a portfolio firstly then perhaps later to start a small web design business from home.

Problem is that people buy up every single decent domain name they can think of and sell them for a fortune. However, they seem to only but .com's and every good business name I think of is always taken with .com

Although, there are a few good ones I like that are available as .co.uk, so my question is; is it ok for a UK business to have a .co.uk domain only? I would obviously check that the .com version didnt lead to a competitor. The other thing is, does this put you out of the question for international work?

Ideally I would like the .co.uk and .com but the good .com domains are up to ?50k some of them. Im looking to pay about ?20 for my domain lol

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1116591-couk-domain-only-for-uk-business/
Share on other sites

21 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

As long as the domain name is short and simple, it doesn't matter what suffix it has on the end of it... well apart from .xxx ;-)

Unless he actually does freelance erotica images/movies/website work :)

  • 0

As long as the domain name is short and simple, it doesn't matter what suffix it has on the end of it... well apart from .xxx ;-)

NICs of certain countries (.ca and .ee come to mind, there's many more) do have restrictions - like, for residents only, for registered companies only and/or various third-level rules.

.co.uk doesn't have any restrictions, though.

  • 0

Well, I always had in mind that I would find one I liked and just buy the .co.uk but when I started reading articles on domain names they all say to get the .com because if you tell someone your business name but not your domain, chances are they are gonna type in www.yourbusiness.com and the majority will try the .com. That could send them to a competitor.

However, every single good name I think of is taken as .com so Im leaning toward just going for a .co.uk and perhaps if I make it big I could buy the .com :laugh:

  • 0

As long as the domain name is short and simple, it doesn't matter what suffix it has on the end of it... well apart from .xxx ;-)

I disagree, the xxx suffix will get him LOADS more traffic!

  • Like 1
  • 0

NICs of certain countries (.ca and .ee come to mind, there's many more) do have restrictions - like, for residents only, for registered companies only and/or various third-level rules.

.co.uk doesn't have any restrictions, though.

The UK's SLD do have restrictions.

You can register a UK domain as a personal site and opt out of providing your registered details in the whois information for the domain. However, if you're a charity, business or sole trader you're required to provide a UK registered VAT or business number and the whois information must contain the registered business address.

Also, UK businesses who trade online must provide full address for contacting on their website.

  • 0

The UK's SLD do have restrictions.

You can register a UK domain as a personal site and opt out of providing your registered details in the whois information for the domain. However, if you're a charity, business or sole trader you're required to provide a UK registered VAT or business number and the whois information must contain the registered business address.

Also, UK businesses who trade online must provide full address for contacting on their website.

Hmm, Nominet says there isn't. But then again I haven't actually tried to register any nor am I from England, local laws are unknown to me, so your word carries more weight, I guess.

  • 0

Well, I always had in mind that I would find one I liked and just buy the .co.uk but when I started reading articles on domain names they all say to get the .com because if you tell someone your business name but not your domain, chances are they are gonna type in www.yourbusiness.com and the majority will try the .com. That could send them to a competitor.

However, every single good name I think of is taken as .com so Im leaning toward just going for a .co.uk and perhaps if I make it big I could buy the .com :laugh:

Wouldn't worry about it. Most of your visitors will come direct from Google (other search engines available!). If you're predominantly going to be doing business in the UK then go with a .co.uk, if you intend to take it global, get a .com.

  • Like 2
  • 0

The UK's SLD do have restrictions.

You can register a UK domain as a personal site and opt out of providing your registered details in the whois information for the domain. However, if you're a charity, business or sole trader you're required to provide a UK registered VAT or business number and the whois information must contain the registered business address.

Also, UK businesses who trade online must provide full address for contacting on their website.

That all depends on if a portfolio site counts as being a site for a business. You also cannot be required to provide a VAT number because there is no requirement for tiny businesses to register for VAT so not all businesses/sole traders will be registered for VAT

  • 0

Wouldn't worry about it. Most of your visitors will come direct from Google (other search engines available!). If you're predominantly going to be doing business in the UK then go with a .co.uk, if you intend to take it global, get a .com.

This is good advice. I guess it doesn't matter how good your website/business name is, if you have a crap portfolio and no referrals then you wont get any work. Also I guess that [something]web or something[studio] are just too overdone and cliche.

I saw a design company called Bright Cherry and I really liked that. Think I will go with something along those lines, rather than trying to make it specifically related to design/web.

Going along those lines also makes it more likely I will get the domain I want

  • 0

Hmm, Nominet says there isn't. But then again I haven't actually tried to register any nor am I from England, local laws are unknown to me, so your word carries more weight, I guess.

Quite true. It looks like they no longer make it a requirement to have a registered company. I just logged into nic.uk and checked by trying to one of my domains.

While its still true that business can't opt-out, it is optional for them to provide a registered name. They also have a non-UK residential opt-out registration now too.

Thanks for bringing this to my attention... It makes a few things quite interesting now.

  • 0

.co.uk doesn't sound appropriate for a freelance web designer.

Just get a .net, or something.

The only thing is that although I am freelance just now, at some point Id like to register as a propper business, then a .co.uk would be best?

Maybe I could get both I guess and go under the .net for now.

  • 0

Register both.

These days domain names aren't as important as they used to be.

Best of luck with your business.

Can you elaborate on what you mean please?

Im just going to go with something that is easy to spell, understand and is available. I like the word personalised but its rather long and the Americans spell it personalized lol

  • 0

Keep it short. On the other hand, as you know, people rarely type website addresses anymore - they just search for everything - so length doesn't really matter. Choose whatever you think would look nicest on your shiny new business cards, and then focus on some SEO.

But you know all this anyway.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!