• 0

.co.uk domain only for UK business


Question

I have been thinking about starting a small web design business for years, but have never got around to it. I do alot of freelance work, and often work on sites like freelancer. I sometimes make decent money and its always steady income which is great for me at the moment with no full time job.

However, I want to set up my own website to serve as a portfolio firstly then perhaps later to start a small web design business from home.

Problem is that people buy up every single decent domain name they can think of and sell them for a fortune. However, they seem to only but .com's and every good business name I think of is always taken with .com

Although, there are a few good ones I like that are available as .co.uk, so my question is; is it ok for a UK business to have a .co.uk domain only? I would obviously check that the .com version didnt lead to a competitor. The other thing is, does this put you out of the question for international work?

Ideally I would like the .co.uk and .com but the good .com domains are up to ?50k some of them. Im looking to pay about ?20 for my domain lol

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1116591-couk-domain-only-for-uk-business/
Share on other sites

21 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

As long as the domain name is short and simple, it doesn't matter what suffix it has on the end of it... well apart from .xxx ;-)

Unless he actually does freelance erotica images/movies/website work :)

  • 0

As long as the domain name is short and simple, it doesn't matter what suffix it has on the end of it... well apart from .xxx ;-)

NICs of certain countries (.ca and .ee come to mind, there's many more) do have restrictions - like, for residents only, for registered companies only and/or various third-level rules.

.co.uk doesn't have any restrictions, though.

  • 0

Well, I always had in mind that I would find one I liked and just buy the .co.uk but when I started reading articles on domain names they all say to get the .com because if you tell someone your business name but not your domain, chances are they are gonna type in www.yourbusiness.com and the majority will try the .com. That could send them to a competitor.

However, every single good name I think of is taken as .com so Im leaning toward just going for a .co.uk and perhaps if I make it big I could buy the .com :laugh:

  • 0

As long as the domain name is short and simple, it doesn't matter what suffix it has on the end of it... well apart from .xxx ;-)

I disagree, the xxx suffix will get him LOADS more traffic!

  • Like 1
  • 0

NICs of certain countries (.ca and .ee come to mind, there's many more) do have restrictions - like, for residents only, for registered companies only and/or various third-level rules.

.co.uk doesn't have any restrictions, though.

The UK's SLD do have restrictions.

You can register a UK domain as a personal site and opt out of providing your registered details in the whois information for the domain. However, if you're a charity, business or sole trader you're required to provide a UK registered VAT or business number and the whois information must contain the registered business address.

Also, UK businesses who trade online must provide full address for contacting on their website.

  • 0

The UK's SLD do have restrictions.

You can register a UK domain as a personal site and opt out of providing your registered details in the whois information for the domain. However, if you're a charity, business or sole trader you're required to provide a UK registered VAT or business number and the whois information must contain the registered business address.

Also, UK businesses who trade online must provide full address for contacting on their website.

Hmm, Nominet says there isn't. But then again I haven't actually tried to register any nor am I from England, local laws are unknown to me, so your word carries more weight, I guess.

  • 0

Well, I always had in mind that I would find one I liked and just buy the .co.uk but when I started reading articles on domain names they all say to get the .com because if you tell someone your business name but not your domain, chances are they are gonna type in www.yourbusiness.com and the majority will try the .com. That could send them to a competitor.

However, every single good name I think of is taken as .com so Im leaning toward just going for a .co.uk and perhaps if I make it big I could buy the .com :laugh:

Wouldn't worry about it. Most of your visitors will come direct from Google (other search engines available!). If you're predominantly going to be doing business in the UK then go with a .co.uk, if you intend to take it global, get a .com.

  • Like 2
  • 0

The UK's SLD do have restrictions.

You can register a UK domain as a personal site and opt out of providing your registered details in the whois information for the domain. However, if you're a charity, business or sole trader you're required to provide a UK registered VAT or business number and the whois information must contain the registered business address.

Also, UK businesses who trade online must provide full address for contacting on their website.

That all depends on if a portfolio site counts as being a site for a business. You also cannot be required to provide a VAT number because there is no requirement for tiny businesses to register for VAT so not all businesses/sole traders will be registered for VAT

  • 0

Wouldn't worry about it. Most of your visitors will come direct from Google (other search engines available!). If you're predominantly going to be doing business in the UK then go with a .co.uk, if you intend to take it global, get a .com.

This is good advice. I guess it doesn't matter how good your website/business name is, if you have a crap portfolio and no referrals then you wont get any work. Also I guess that [something]web or something[studio] are just too overdone and cliche.

I saw a design company called Bright Cherry and I really liked that. Think I will go with something along those lines, rather than trying to make it specifically related to design/web.

Going along those lines also makes it more likely I will get the domain I want

  • 0

Hmm, Nominet says there isn't. But then again I haven't actually tried to register any nor am I from England, local laws are unknown to me, so your word carries more weight, I guess.

Quite true. It looks like they no longer make it a requirement to have a registered company. I just logged into nic.uk and checked by trying to one of my domains.

While its still true that business can't opt-out, it is optional for them to provide a registered name. They also have a non-UK residential opt-out registration now too.

Thanks for bringing this to my attention... It makes a few things quite interesting now.

  • 0

.co.uk doesn't sound appropriate for a freelance web designer.

Just get a .net, or something.

The only thing is that although I am freelance just now, at some point Id like to register as a propper business, then a .co.uk would be best?

Maybe I could get both I guess and go under the .net for now.

  • 0

Register both.

These days domain names aren't as important as they used to be.

Best of luck with your business.

Can you elaborate on what you mean please?

Im just going to go with something that is easy to spell, understand and is available. I like the word personalised but its rather long and the Americans spell it personalized lol

  • 0

Keep it short. On the other hand, as you know, people rarely type website addresses anymore - they just search for everything - so length doesn't really matter. Choose whatever you think would look nicest on your shiny new business cards, and then focus on some SEO.

But you know all this anyway.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • google, meta, microsoft, true cancers of modern society
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 changelog: Fixed a bug where Overwrite behaved as Overwrite All during same-drive move operations. AdvancedInstaller fixed the installer’s security vulnerability: EXE Bootstrapper resolved the %appdata% location incorrectly for the System account. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 | 14.6 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • First exciting thing to come to Windows in a long time ! This is the kind of things they should focus on, instead of cramming as much AI as they can in everything.
    • New AMD graphics driver fixes install issues and FSR 4.1 crashes on RX 7000 GPUs by Taras Buria AMD is rolling out yet another graphics driver. Version 26.6.4 is now available for download, bringing two important fixes. One is for those still using Windows 10 and having trouble installing driver 26.6.2. In fact, this patch is coming from the recently released hotfix, so it is not new if you are already running version 26.6.3. The second fix is for RX 7000 owners. AMD recently brought FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen graphics cards, but there was a bug with certain games crashing when using FSR 4.1. I experienced this issue with Forza Horizon 6, so today's driver should take care of that. Here is the official changelog: Intermittent install issue seen when installing AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.2 on Windows® 10 systems for Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Intermittent application crash may be observed in some games with AMD FSR Upscaling 4.1 enabled on Radeon™ RX 7000 series graphics products. Known issues include the following: Intermittent application crash or driver timeout may be observed while playing Battlefield™ 6 on AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. AMD is actively working on a resolution with the developer to be released as soon as possible. Texture flickering or corruption may appear while playing Battlefield™ 6 with AMD Record and Stream on some AMD graphics products. AMD FSR Upscaling and AMD FSR Frame Generation may show as inactive in AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition while playing Battlefield™ 6 when enabled on Radeon™ RX 9000 series graphics products. Failure to install may be observed while installing AI Bundle components in some regions with limited access to HuggingFace and GitHub. Model flickering or rendering failure may be observed in Maxon Cinema 4D and Blender on Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Users experiencing this issue are recommended to install AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.3.1. Intermittent application crash may be observed on some models while running Blender on Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Users experiencing this issue are recommended to install AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.3.1. You can download the AMD Radeon driver 26.6.4 from the official website here. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • Amazon may use OpenAI and Nova models after Anthropic reportedly raises costs by Karthik Mudaliar Amazon is reportedly considering to use OpenAI models and even its own Nova family of AI models after Anthropic raised the cost of using Claude inside Amazon services. According to a report from The Information, Amazon is weighing its options to reduce costs under a new arrangement with Anthropic. But back in April, Amazon said it would invest $5 billion more in Anthropic, with the possibility of adding up to another $20 billion if certain commercial milestones are met. That investment actually came on top of another $8 billion Amazon had already put into the Claude maker. Anthropic, meanwhile, committed to spend more than $100 billion over 10 years on AWS technologies, including Amazon’s Trainium chips. Amazon isn't just a customer of Anthropic but also one of the most important backers and cloud partners. This is why it makes it interesting that Amazon is considering other alternatives to handle its internal workloads. Although Amazon has been building its own options for a while now. Its Nova family of AI models was announced in late 2024 for Amazon Bedrock, with models aimed at text, image, and video tasks. Amazon pitched the model around cost and latency at that time. With that said, OpenAI has also become a more realistic option recently for AWS customers as well as for Amazon itself. Earlier this year, OpenAI brought its latest models and Codex coding agent to Amazon Bedrock, after changes to its previously more restrictive Microsoft cloud arrangement. This allowed AWS to serve even those customers who wanted other alternatives from Claude, without having to move workloads out of Amazon's cloud. Evaluating alternatives could also be due to commercial pressure and not necessarily a sign of a damaged partnership between Amazon and Anthropic. Whether or not Amazon is actually considering switching entirely to OpenAI's models or its own Nova models remains unknown at this moment.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      61
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!