iPhone 4/4S + otterbox case + screen protector = your view?


Recommended Posts

Has anyone put an otterbox case on their iPhone which already has a screen protector on it?

Just wondering if the protector bubbles due to it sitting right near the edges. The wife has a Galaxy S3 but her screen protector doesn't sit as close to the edges & as a result her otterbox case doesn't make the screen protector bubble.

Don't know anyone who has one for their iPhone though.

Has anyone put an otterbox case on their iPhone which already has a screen protector on it?

Just wondering if the protector bubbles due to it sitting right near the edges. The wife has a Galaxy S3 but her screen protector doesn't sit as close to the edges & as a result her otterbox case doesn't make the screen protector bubble.

Don't know anyone who has one for their iPhone though.

I had a SGP Ultra on, then an otter box defender. It didn't bother me at all. Though, since I had to get a refurb Iphone, I only have the otterbox display protector :-(.

Kinda doesn't help though. I like the 'flimsy' screen covers.

In the 2 years i owned my 3GS i always had one on. They fitted well - with no bubbles at all, which meant i didn't notice they were even on (so if i don't notice it then i can't not like it). When they got too scuffed or whatever, i'd change them.

So really need to know how they fair with the otterbox case on as well (ideally the commuter case), as i have until the weekend to switch my 4S for an S3, by which point i'm out of time & would have to stick with the 4S.

Got 3 Iphone 4's (one for wife, kid, myself) and 3 of the otterbox defenders. Daughter has wrecked the case and have replaced it once. Phone is pristine. Wife's phone got dropped down the stairs at the Disneyland parking structure and survived w/o any problems with the phone itself! Neither have had any issues with the screen protector. so A+ in my book!

The only issue it does have is the rubber tends to stick to my pockets a bit when so always having to tuck my pockets back in. Small annoyance.

I have purchased a couple defenders. 1 for each iPhone. 3GS, 4s, 5. On my 3GS, I had already purchased an invisishield before I bought the otterbox, and did not want to loose the protection the invisishield gave the phone, so I actually popped the screen protector that was on the otterbox off. Its actually just attached with a thin glue type substance, very easy to remove and clean. The only downfall I had, was the invisishield is kinda "rubbery" and with the otterbox fitting so tight on the 3GS it caused it to leave indention's in the screen protector on the 4 corners where the case and the screen meet. It did not scratch my screen at all or cut through the screen protector, but it left indention's in it. I have since gotten away from using invisishield because I just hate the way they feel.

As far as on the 4s and the 5. I kept the screen protector that came with the otterbox on and used that with no issues. I did however put a defender on my wifes 4 one time when she already had a screen protector on it and it looked horrible. It didnt bubble, but it had this layer of oil look. I cleaned the crap out of both screen protectors inside and out to see if it helped but it didn't.

So I would say. If you have a nice anti glare or expensive screen protector on your phone already. Leave it and pop out the otterbox screen protector. If not, then just take the screen protector off your device and use the otterbox one.

I don't buy expensive protectors. I bought a pack of 10 for my 3GS from eBay for ?1-?3. Nice & cheap but did the job.

Is the otterbox protector any different from these cheap screen protectors? For the record i don't buy the anti glare ones either. I had one of those once & thought it was horrible.

I also wont be buying the defender if that makes much/any difference? It'd be the less bulky commuter i'd be buying.

I don't buy expensive protectors. I bought a pack of 10 for my 3GS from eBay for ?1-?3. Nice & cheap but did the job.

Is the otterbox protector any different from these cheap screen protectors? For the record i don't buy the anti glare ones either. I had one of those once & thought it was horrible.

I also wont be buying the defender if that makes much/any difference? It'd be the less bulky commuter i'd be buying.

I bought my and my wife's iPhone 4s just before the 5 was released and got an Otterbox for each of them. I would have preferred to just get a screen protector because the Otterbox does bulk up the phone considerably imho. Sometimes it even makes it uncomfortable to hold. The reason for buying the Otterboxes though is because I have twin 3 (almost 4) year old boys that tend to find ways to get their hands on the phones. They aren't nearly as careful with them as my wife and I are. They have been great from the protection standpoint but the area around the font and back cameras get really dirty and require the occasional removal of the phone to clean up. In my situation I wouldn't trade them for anything else at the moment however as I said, I would much rather have just had a screen protector if not for the kids.

On another upside note the Otterbox does come with a click-in belt carrier that servers a dual purpose. The belt clip can act as a nice stand in different configurations if you leave you phone attached to it and can prop your phone at various viewing angles from both a portrait and landscape perspective. The clip can lock into the open position to further modify the viewing angles.

Overall it is a nice protective device for the money but that doesn't change my preference of the bare phone with just the screen/back protector on it.

Good luck on your decision.

I bought my and my wife's iPhone 4s just before the 5 was released and got an Otterbox for each of them. I would have preferred to just get a screen protector because the Otterbox does bulk up the phone considerably imho. Sometimes it even makes it uncomfortable to hold. The reason for buying the Otterboxes though is because I have twin 3 (almost 4) year old boys that tend to find ways to get their hands on the phones. They aren't nearly as careful with them as my wife and I are. They have been great from the protection standpoint but the area around the font and back cameras get really dirty and require the occasional removal of the phone to clean up. In my situation I wouldn't trade them for anything else at the moment however as I said, I would much rather have just had a screen protector if not for the kids.

On another upside note the Otterbox does come with a click-in belt carrier that servers a dual purpose. The belt clip can act as a nice stand in different configurations if you leave you phone attached to it and can prop your phone at various viewing angles from both a portrait and landscape perspective. The clip can lock into the open position to further modify the viewing angles.

Overall it is a nice protective device for the money but that doesn't change my preference of the bare phone with just the screen/back protector on it.

Good luck on your decision.

Sorry, I should have mentioned that I did buy the Defender cases. I'm sure they are thicker than the Commuter but I'm not sure if they provide the same level of protection. It also doesn't appear that the Commuter comes with the belt clip so sorry to have included that tidbit.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The Trump administration doesn't want you to use OpenAI's GPT-5.6 without its approval by David Uzondu Image via @realDonalTrump (X) As OpenAI prepares the release of its next model, GPT 5.6, the White House has instructed the company to limit the distribution of the software to a small group of government-approved partners instead of the general public, as it has done with previous releases. According to The Information, OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman sent an internal memo to staff on Thursday explaining that the federal government will approve access "customer by customer" during an initial preview phase. Altman noted in the communication that this restrictive rollout is "not [their] long-term model" for software deployment, and the company plans to work toward a "more sustainable" distribution method later. CNN said that both OpenAI and the Trump administration view the capabilities of GPT 5.6 on the same level as Anthropic's Mythos and that government officials intend to "collaborate with frontier AI labs to develop shared approaches for addressing the challenges of scaling this technology." The latest restriction comes just weeks after the US Commerce Department decided to restrict Fable, a version of Mythos with extra safety "guardrails" to prevent users from exploiting software vulnerabilities. Not long after the release, though, researchers at Amazon found a way to bypass these restrictions, prompting an aggressive response from federal authorities. The government ordered Anthropic to cut off access for non-US citizens located outside the US, non-US citizens living inside the US, and incredibly, even Anthropic's own foreign-born employees. Anthropic now appears to be building a workaround to resolve this compliance block with an update to its Privacy Policy that introduces a category called "Verification Data" to handle KYC and Digital IDs. This setup could mandate digital identity checks to filter users by nationality, requiring a government-issued ID and facial biometric data. Who knows? Maybe in the future, you would have to scan your US Passport or State ID to prove your citizenship before you are allowed to chat with Fable 5 (or any other model).
    • When Windows 7 was released I created an AutoHotkey script that uses Alt+` as a keyboard shortcut to move a window across monitors. I have been using that script for over 15 years and this is the first time I have come across another app that uses the same shortcut!
    • I called it last year that they wouldn't end support when they said there would. There are too many people still on Windows 10 waiting for something better to upgrade to and 11 ain't it! The recent promises of fixing Windows 11's many problems is nice, but unless they deliver on those promises in a big way then I expect customers will still want to stick with 10.
    • Full ACK. I went too far adressing your post specifically. And as you said, it up to us customers as participant of the market dynamic as it happens to decide whether we spend our money on a product or not. The responsibility is to the company. In case of this price hike one could assume that MS is expecting or even starting to see a new interest in XBox hardware so they want to avoid losses per unit sold. I find it fair enough that they granted a period in which everyone interested could grab a unit for the current price (Amazon.de has a reliable stock of XBox Series X digital, which I bought last December after having sold my day one Series X a year ago). It is not that they cash up their customers starting on Monday. Cheers and let's cling to our perfectly fine hardware as long as we deem it worthy in relation to purchasing something new!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Enthusiast
      Xonos went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      412
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      129
    4. 4
      neufuse
      69
    5. 5
      Xenon
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!