Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

Ive got to the stage now that I need a secure, reliable, and quick method of backing up my files.

I made the switch to digital media around 9 years ago (where does the time go) and as such I have 9 years worth and growing of digital family media consisting of photos and videos.

Due to smartphones, I now find myself taking even more photos and videos of my family/children and I have now reached the stage where I need to sit down and make some plans to ensure the safety of my digital media.

I have around 15 dvds full up with digital photos, and an additional 250gb on my hard drive.

I understand that dvd's/cd's are not a reliable form of storage and can erase over time depending on their storage, at the moment they are kept away from direct sunlight.

I have a seagate external hard drive, however it takes forever to take a copy of my hard drive files each time, what would you recommend as a decent back up system which is reliable, secure, and quick?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1117041-best-method-of-backup/
Share on other sites

Hello,

There are basically two "broad" methods of backing up one's data these days. Those are backs which are stored locally, and backups which are stored on the Internet (i.e., "cloud-based" backups). Each one then branches into various different types of technologies, mechanisms and use cases, but those tend to vary based on what exactly you want to do, as well as factors such as backup time, restore time and cost of the solution, to name a few.

I do not have much experience with cloud-based backup solutions, but I have been interested in backing up my data locally for quite some time, and discussed my solution in an earlier message thread here on Neowin.

Also, I wrote a white paper called Options for Backing Up Your Computer [PDF, 862KB] which gives a broad overview of local backup solutions. It is completely agnostic (e.g., doesn't mention any vendors at all?just the technologies involved). You might find that of interest as well.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

  • Like 3

"I have a seagate external hard drive, however it takes forever to take a copy of my hard drive files each time"

Confused about this - are you making new copies of everything, or just the new/modified stuff? What do you consider forever, since clearly its not literally that or you would never have a copy completed ;)

Maybe there is something wrong with your external - or your on usb 1?

When it comes to family photos/videos - you should be more concerned with a full DR plan vs just backup. I have my photos/videos on 2 different systems here at house. I then have them in 2 different systems online - one being lower quality used to share the them over the internet, but it does count as a worse case scenario copy.

The other copy is original format 1080p 60fps.

I then also have a copy on optical media here in the house and copy at my sons place - just in case a tornado took my house to OZ, my 2 HDD copies and optical copies would be gone. I personally would not take optical media copy out of your solution.. I am thinking of moving to the new 1000 year disks to remove the concern of bad optical media. http://www.m-disc.com/

The other issue that comes to mind is not just backup of the files but that you can read/play the files no matter what media its on. So you have this .mp4 file encoded with h.264 -- are you going to be able to play that in 20 years? Even if you move the file to current media as it changes? At somepoint I would have to think conversion to newer format is also going to have to happen.

I think of these things as I have my 2 year old grand daughters videos, and wanting to make they will be around for her to show her grand kids.

  • Like 2

For me personally, I tend to go a little overboard, but then again I don?t think you can ever have too many backups.

Inside my computer I have 6 hard drives. 1 of which is used for backup. Every night all of my important things get backed up to that hard drive. At the same time I also have a carbonite subscription which I have about 20GB worth of information that gets backed up there.

Then I also bought 2 regular 3.5 3TB hard drives, to backup every drive on my system. I use it in conjunction with a Sata dock. 1 of the 3TB drives stays in my office, while the other drive gets put in a safety deposit box at the bank. Both drives get swapped monthly and both drives are never at my house at the same time.

The Sata dock via esata gives you native Sata speeds, thus making for a much faster backup.

The software I use is syncback SE, it?s configured never to delete from the backup and to update files which are new or that have changed. Thus the very first backup takes the longest, after that, not so much. It's also set the create 7 different versions of my quickbook company file.

Hello,

Also, I wrote a white paper called Options for Backing Up Your Computer [PDF, 862KB] which gives a broad overview of local backup solutions. It is completely agnostic (e.g., doesn't mention any vendors at all?just the technologies involved). You might find that of interest as well.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

Great job on the PDF, I might even give this to some of my customers.

For me personally, I tend to go a little overboard, but then again I don?t think you can ever have too many backups.

Inside my computer I have 6 hard drives. 1 of which is used for backup. Every night all of my important things get backed up to that hard drive. At the same time I also have a carbonite subscription which I have about 20GB worth of information that gets backed up there.

Then I also bought 2 regular 3.5 3TB hard drives, to backup every drive on my system. I use it in conjunction with a Sata dock. 1 of the 3TB drives stays in my office, while the other drive gets put in a safety deposit box at the bank. Both drives get swapped monthly and both drives are never at my house at the same time.

The Sata dock via esata gives you native Sata speeds, thus making for a much faster backup.

The software I use is syncback SE, it?s configured never to delete from the backup and to update files which are new or that have changed. Thus the very first backup takes the longest, after that, not so much. It's also set the create 7 different versions of my quickbook company file.

That's.... quite overkill don't you think? I mean, swapping HDDs at your bank... if data is replicable, I don't exactly see the point on that...

That's.... quite overkill don't you think? I mean, swapping HDDs at your bank... if data is replicable, I don't exactly see the point on that...

The bank is off site backup. In case disaster strikes and my house burns down or something. The 3TB here at the house is for convenience and the one at the bank is for Disaster Recovery. Some things on those drives are not backed up on carbonite because they VERY large in size.

I only swap the drive at the bank once a month, I don't do it every week.

I also print out all my roboform passwords and keep it in the box as well.

The bank is off site backup. In case disaster strikes and my house burns down or something. The 3TB here at the house is for convenience and the one at the bank is for Disaster Recovery. Some things on those drives are not backed up on carbonite because they VERY large in size.

I only swap the drive at the bank once a month, I don't do it every week.

I also print out all my roboform passwords and keep it in the box as well.

Pr0n in Bank, what can take so much size in a HDD? pr0n HD only :D (no offense)

Pr0n in Bank, what can take so much size in a HDD? pr0n HD only :D (no offense)

"if data is replicable, I don't exactly see the point on that..."

Hard drives are VERY easy for backing stuff up, so there really should be no reason to loose ANY of your data no mater how replicable it is....and yes, if someone has porn, then why loose it if it's easy to backup?

On a previous thread while a go I was surprised on some of the mindset of some of the members of this form, which was.... more or less

"Hard drives crash, you loose your data, it's a part of life"

I just have all my important data on Dropbox, is around 10GB. I trust their (aka Amazon's) backup facilities will do just fine.

All my photos are on a local 1TB disk that gets mirrored to an identical disk every week. Every 6 months I do a full copy of that disk to a third 1TB disk that is stored at my grandparents house :)

  • Like 2

That's.... quite overkill don't you think? I mean, swapping HDDs at your bank... if data is replicable, I don't exactly see the point on that...

that's warwagon we are talking about... :laugh:

now seriously, i'm just as paranoid about backups, after losing a whole disk volume because of a bad partition change. :angry:

@Goretsky: good job on that paper, very well explained and clear. :)

  • Like 2

Hello,

Thank you. I really strove to cover all the physical technologies and backup scenarios on that one. I may publish a small update to cover SD Cards and pros and cons of the various file systems for direct access storage.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

Great job on the PDF, I might even give this to some of my customers.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!