Like your Surface? No, you can't (or shouldn't). It's a bad dev


Recommended Posts

Checked another demo unit out, this one had the Type Cover. No complaints with it - well spaced, I don't mind the lack of travel as I've been using laptops for so long. Not quite as fond of the trackpad on it though, it could have used the texturing on the Touch Cover. The Touch Cover isn't even flexible though, so I see no practical reason to get it over the Type Cover.

The problem is that they couldn't make it any more flexible than it is already otherwise it wouldn't make a very good keyboard to type on.

I have a Surface and agree somewhat. And I also think WinRT is to blame for a lot of this. There is simply no excuse for Metro apps taking so long to launch, for the Store to show me a blank white screen for seconds, for IE Metro to reload a page every time I hit back. None of this happens on iOS or Android, not until the app is cached out of memory, which is only if I have a ton of pages/apps loaded. I suspect WinRT consumes a lot more memory since it is a full desktop OS after all, and thus everything else suffers.

I had high hopes for the Surface since it was supposed to showcase the touch UI in Windows 8, but in reality it's not that great to use - things like the charms bar, the new task switcher etc are no better as far as usability goes. Surface Pro has a legitimate use case, for people who need full x86 on a portable device. Surface, I'm not so sure, unless you really truly must have Office.

I have a Surface and agree somewhat. And I also think WinRT is to blame for a lot of this. There is simply no excuse for Metro apps taking so long to launch, for the Store to show me a blank white screen for seconds, for IE Metro to reload a page every time I hit back. None of this happens on iOS or Android, not until the app is cached out of memory, which is only if I have a ton of pages/apps loaded. I suspect WinRT consumes a lot more memory since it is a full desktop OS after all, and thus everything else suffers.

oh that is BS. I have an iPad and an Android phone, and neither is instant on these things.

and iOS most definitely reload on back, and yep, so does chrome on android.

Also WinRT is no more a full desktop OS than iOS is. technically both of them are stripped down full desktop OS'

oh that is BS. I have an iPad and an Android phone, and neither is instant on these things.

and iOS most definitely reload on back, and yep, so does chrome on android.

Also WinRT is no more a full desktop OS than iOS is. technically both of them are stripped down full desktop OS'

Really, iOS is a stripped down OSX? Perhaps you'll show me how I can access the desktop on my iPad, or how I can run an OSX program compiled for ARM? WinRT is Windows compiled for ARM, iOS and Android were both written for mobile devices. Maybe you should look at the size the OS takes on the device.

And neither iOS or Android will reload a webpage when you go back. Neither does WP8.

Really, iOS is a stripped down OSX? Perhaps you'll show me how I can access the desktop on my iPad, or how I can run an OSX program compiled for ARM? WinRT is Windows compiled for ARM, iOS and Android were both written for mobile devices. Maybe you should look at the size the OS takes on the device.

And neither iOS or Android will reload a webpage when you go back. Neither does WP8.

He is correct Surface uses Windows NT Kernel and some other userland, as does iOS. Just because the UI is not the same doesn't mean that the core of these are based on their full desktop OS counterparts.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IOS

It's a testament to both systems, showing how portable their code bases are that they can both still switch between different CPU architecture

(Windows NT has always been portable (Alpha & Itanium, DEC as well as some other RISC's) as has the core underpinnings of MacOSX Unix which is all about portability.

As for the lag, im not sure i haven't used a Surface yet so cant comment. I think for the majority it depends on what your doing at the time, sometimes my Android (GN 10.1) and my iPad have lagged when changing orientation, most of the time it's pretty instant. The surface problem sounds like it can be fixed through further updates anyway as the hardware doesn't seem to be that underpowered.

Really, iOS is a stripped down OSX? Perhaps you'll show me how I can access the desktop on my iPad, or how I can run an OSX program compiled for ARM? WinRT is Windows compiled for ARM, iOS and Android were both written for mobile devices. Maybe you should look at the size the OS takes on the device.

And neither iOS or Android will reload a webpage when you go back. Neither does WP8.

Maybe you should read up on what iOS actually is, then come back here. because it is in fact a stripped down OSX. and what does the desktop have to do with that ? the Shell is a VERY small part of the OS. you do realize that win 8 runs two shells in parallel, the Modern interface shell and the desktop, side by side under explorer. on RT. RT is technically the only shell, But it's able to run a limited version of an emulated desktop. basically the desktop is just an app. running under explorer.

But both OS' are stripped down minimal versions of their desktop counterparts. If you think the existences of a virtual/emulated desktop is what makes or not makes it a desktop based OS. then you have a few more things to learn about these things.

As for the back thing. Well funny how BOTH my iPad and my Android phone reloaded when I clicked back then... oh because they both do it. Want to see how it looks when a browser DOESN'T reload on back ? install Opera.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Yes, it was amusing at the time because even then dbrand was well known for stealing the designs of products from other companies. That’s what they do.
    • Didn’t Dbrand once complain that Casetify was ripping off their designs a well? seems pretty bad of them to try and get around Valve’s copyright this way with that in mind.
    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed by David Uzondu Image via Dbrand Dbrand has cancelled its highly anticipated Companion Cube enclosure for the Valve Steam Machine, which it teased back in November of last year with a concept render and sign-up page, because it did not ask Valve for permission first before manufacturing the case. According to Dbrand, it took the "backwards approach" of building the product first before asking for permission from the copyright holder. Seven months of work went into the project, requiring over a thousand engineering hours from the design team. Workers developed forty-four sets of injection molding tools, making a unique mold for each sub-component of the crate. When the Companion Cube went live on Monday last week, it, according to Dbrand, quickly became the second-fastest-selling product in the company's fifteen-year history, racking up orders for hundreds of thousands of units. Customers eagerly bought the $129.95 deluxe edition or the bare-bones $99.95 version, which the manufacturer cheekily branded as the "Poverty Cube". It was around this time that the legal eagles at Valve descended on the accessory maker with a formal demand. The developer pointed out that the iconic block design remains protected intellectual property from the game Portal, so unlicensed sales had to stop. Dbrand said that all its pleas to salvage the project with the Valve team, including proposals to run a properly licensed release under official terms "with their blessing", fell on deaf ears, so it had no choice but to obey and remove every trace of the product from the internet. If you bought the enclosure, the company said that banks will process your refund by the end of this week, but if it still hasn't arrived in your account by then, you should not hesitate to contact support. The Steam Machine itself is a high-performance console that Valve designed directly to bring PC gaming into the living room. It was announced on 12th November 2025 (the same day Dbrand announced the Cube) and runs on the Linux-based SteamOS, the same OS that powers the Steam Deck. As for the price, due to the shortage of memory and storage chips, the hardware cost landed much higher than people were expecting, starting at $1,049 for the 512 model (without a controller) or $1,128 with the new gamepad. The premium 2 TB model pushes those prices even higher, selling at $1,349 for the standalone console and hitting $1,428 if you want the bundle.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      57
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!