Recommended Posts

I thought I wanted this, but having used 8 for a while now, I don't. You would really have to have the perfect background for it not to be a distraction and I'm not there long enough. I think the plain options available OOTB are best for usability. JMO.

I'll have to give this one to MS. I'm sure they tested it thoroughly. IMO you have to add way too much blur and/or opacity to make it viable.

That could be it, still, no harm in having the option for those who want it.

It's cool for a while, but now I see why Microsoft didn't include this feature by default. But now it seems like I'm stuck with this because I can't see a 'restore to default' option anywhere. And even though there are the default textures to choose from, they don't really restore your original background but instead replace it with some messed up zoomed version of it. I want my good ol' Start screen back. :(

Select no background and it will use your OS settings.

You may also find more simplistic wallpapers rather than photos work better and for 1.0 we plan to include a number of enhancements to reduce any distraction while at the same time allowing you to customize what you see.

I will add that some of the Microsoft defaults are far from non distracting though!

I can imagine Microsoft adding in this functionality into a big update in the future, but if they don't then this looks a great program. I would buy it but with Start8 I don't really use the Metro Start Screen that often so it'd be a bit of a waste :p

Now I know what Sekyal was talking about in the Window Like/Hate thread...I didn't know it was a stardock app. so, I Googled "decor8" and this is what it gave me.

http://www.decor8blog.com/

Sooo I thought, "wtf does crafts have to do with Windows?" until I looked here instead. I may have to give the trial a shot. But I feel really stupid right now :blush:

This is stuff Microsoft should have added to Windows 8 by default.

Why, they're tryign to maintain usability. and there's little point in backgrounds on a start screen you're only going to be watching for a few seconds at a time at the most anyway. Especially when those very same photo backgrounds make it harder and slower to use by making it all messy. There's a reason why the speedometer on yoru car doesn't have a photo background.

Why, they're tryign to maintain usability. and there's little point in backgrounds on a start screen you're only going to be watching for a few seconds at a time at the most anyway. Especially when those very same photo backgrounds make it harder and slower to use by making it all messy. There's a reason why the speedometer on yoru car doesn't have a photo background.

Usability? I'm finding that I barely use the Metro Start screen in the first place, only to use win key+begin-typing-a-program.. having the same background as my desktop makes the transition feel a lot smoother and less interrupting. Metro as is disrupts workflow.

Gonna try it for 30, but I'll probably end up buying this. Microsoft should've hired these guys..

Why, they're tryign to maintain usability. and there's little point in backgrounds on a start screen you're only going to be watching for a few seconds at a time at the most anyway. Especially when those very same photo backgrounds make it harder and slower to use by making it all messy.

Yeah, we wouldn't want that...

post-5569-0-40212200-1352499615.png

  • Like 2

Neat app! One item of functionality I'd love to see is a gaussian blur effect that could automatically be applied to the chosen background picture.

It definitely makes the transition far less annoying when you set up the backgrounds that way. The color shift alone was nauseating to me.

  • Like 2

Why, they're tryign to maintain usability. and there's little point in backgrounds on a start screen you're only going to be watching for a few seconds at a time at the most anyway. Especially when those very same photo backgrounds make it harder and slower to use by making it all messy. There's a reason why the speedometer on yoru car doesn't have a photo background.

OK, then, if that's how you feel about it then this Stardock app is useless.

It's not useless, it'll made Stardock a neat little chump of money off from the small "customizer" crowd, since they'll pay before they realize how useless it is and how little they actually see the start screen and that having a background, much less paying for having one, is rather pointless.

It's not useless, it'll made Stardock a neat little chump of money off from the small "customizer" crowd, since they'll pay before they realize how useless it is and how little they actually see the start screen and that having a background, much less paying for having one, is rather pointless.

I hate that new Start Menu myself. Can't stand those ugly tiles. All I bought from Stardock is Start8 to get my Start Menu back.

I think there will be some free programs that will do the same thing soon but I don't need to spend $5 on a program that just changes the background of the start menu that I am in for a short time. Can you change the font color on files you search for in the Start menu? it would be a real mess on some backgrounds because the font color is white.

I would keep an eye on this person: http://winaero.com/blog/

He already found out how to do advance animations on the Start menu and he shows you how to do it or you can use his free program.

I really like his Win+X menu editor, hell you can let that be your start menu if you want. Win+X is also activated if you put the mouse cursor in the lower left screen and when you see the window for the Start menu right click.

Personally, I like having a launcher that is faster and more effective with direct access to far more pinned favorites directly, and access to unlimited favorites without having to click sub menus. and the ability to organize said favorite apps as I see fit, and group them, making finding and accessing said apps even faster. far faster than clicking down into sub menus in the tiny start menu, that's for sure, and far less clicks.

I think there will be some free programs that will do the same thing soon but I don't need to spend $5 on a program that just changes the background of the start menu that I am in for a short time. Can you change the font color on files you search for in the Start menu? it would be a real mess on some backgrounds because the font color is white.

Unless this app changed that as well, search results as well as "all apps" uses a flat color background not the graphical background.

I really like this app. You can not only change the background, but the colors of the search background, charms, the text color for groups, many options.

Those who say you only look at it briefly aren't really using the live tiles. You keep the Start Screen open longer if checking out your live tiles.

I'v given my thoughts on it here though guess you have an idea how I feel. >> http://throughthepanes.wordpress.com/2012/11/09/decor8/

For the record I don't care at all the have Start8, though this serves a crowd that likes the Start Screen anyway.

?You may also find more simplistic wallpapers rather than photos work better and ?

Pictures of the sky work pretty well. Just a little bit of a color gradient and some grainy texture already makes the start screen feel much more welcoming in my experience (especially when the desktop background is set to be the same). Maybe that's just me.

for 1.0 we plan to include a number of enhancements to reduce any distraction while at the same time allowing you to customize what you see.

Awesome! Looking forward to that.

post-5569-0-04540300-1352658300.png

Pictures of the sky work pretty well. Just a little bit of a color gradient and some grainy texture already makes the start screen feel much more welcoming in my experience (especially when the desktop background is set to be the same). Maybe that's just me.

Awesome! Looking forward to that.

That looks really good.

  • 3 weeks later...

I am happy to report that it works in server 2012. Niiiice I finally have something other then a solid color. Nice. I actually bought it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Personally, I’ve found that it’s usually worth investing in the infrastructure you don’t want to replace later, especially cabling. Running Cat6A (or better, depending on your needs) during an upgrade is relatively inexpensive compared to having to re-cable a few years down the road. For switches I try to balance current specs with realistic growth. If my budget allows it Ill choose switches with higher uplink speeds which leaves room for expanding later on, but I don’t necessarily overspend on access ports if the endpoints won’t benefit from them anytime soon. One lesson I’ve learned is that planning for scalability pays off. It’s much easier to add devices, VLANs, or higher-bandwidth workloads when your network infrastructure already supports it than to replace hardware later.  What is your budget like?
    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
    • Shutter Encoder 20.2 by Razvan Serea Shutter Encoder is one of the best video converter software and image, audio available today. It has been designed by video editors in order to be as accessible and efficient as possible. It is one of the few free professional tools. Based on FFmpeg, it has the largest codec library available. You can thus convert your files into many different formats. Complete settings for the most advanced Shutter Encoder has a panel containing a large number of settings, in order to define your own choices based on your files and perfect your video or audio output. Well-thought-out settings, with parameters predefined to create files quickly and easily. List of functions Without conversion: Cut without re-encoding, Replace audio, Rewrap, Conform, Merge, Extract, Subtitling, Video inserts Sound conversions: WAV, AIFF, FLAC, MP3, AAC, AC3, OPUS, OGG Editing codecs: DNxHD, DNxHR, Apple ProRes, QT Animation, GoPro CineForm, Uncompressed YUV Output codecs: H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1, OGV Broadcast codecs XDCAM HD422, AVC-Intra 100, XAVC, HAP....and much more. Shutter Encoder 20.2 changelog: Added "Intel Quick Sync" hardware acceleration for Linux Added 'Identify speakers' option for "Audio transcription" function Improved installer package Improved video player performance Improved timecode display with drop-frame videos Improved naming convention for surround audio files Fixed splash screen freeze Fixed bug with file hanging Fixed bugs with presets loading Fixed bugs with video player's buffer Fixed bug with 'Total length of file' option Fixed bugs with 'Record screen/device' option Fixed bug with "XAVC" & "XAVC Long GOP" functions Rollback to XPDF tool for PDF conversion Removed unused binary architecture for Mac Various corrections Various improvements Download: Shutter Encoder 20.2 | 166.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Shutter Encoder Portable | 185.0 MB Links: Shutter Encoder Home Page | FAQ / Tips | macOS | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • did you give it permission to do so? its probably on the ToS. After that South Park episode I'm paying attention to them lol
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!