Jump to content



Photo

Blizzard Sued over Battle.net Authentication


  • Please log in to reply
40 replies to this topic

#1 Asrokhel

Asrokhel

    Neowinian

  • Joined: 05-April 12
  • OS: Windows 8 Pro x64 (testing to see if I keep it or go back to Windows 7)

Posted 10 November 2012 - 17:15

LOS ANGELES (CN) - Publishers of "World of Warcraft" and other blockbuster video games make millions by "deceptively and unfairly" charging customers for an after-sale security product to protect their private information from hackers, a class action claims in Federal Court.

Lead plaintiff Benjamin Bell sued Blizzard Entertainment, of Irvine, and its corporate parent, Santa Monica-based Activision Blizzard.

Bell seeks class damages for consumer fraud, unjust enrichment, negligence, breach of contract and bailment. He claims that the same security problem, and after-market fix, occurs in defendants' games "Starcraft" and "Diablo."

Bell claims that game players have to pay $6.40 for a product called the Authenticator to protect their private information from hackers.

Sales of Authenticators, which come as a physical product or download, have brought in $26 million, according to the complaint.

Bell claims that Activision and Blizzard require gamers to use online accounts at the Battle.net website, which collects and stores customers' private information.

Blizzard puts the onus on gamers to buy additional products or tighten security on their devices, rather than making customer accounts more secure, Bell claims.

"Defendants negligently, deliberately, and/or recklessly fail to ensure that adequate, reasonable procedures safeguard the private information stored on this website. As a result of these acts, the private information of plaintiffs and class members has been compromised and/or stolen since at least 2007," according to the 33-page complaint.

"Most recently, on or about May 19, 2012, reports proliferated that class members' Battle.net accounts had suffered a security breach ('hack') at the hands of unknown parties ('hackers'), and on or about August 4, 2012, hackers massively breached Battle.net's security and acquired the private information of all of defendants' customers in the United States, as well as the remainder of North America, Latin America, Australia, New Zealand, and Southeast Asia."

Though account details for millions of gamers were compromised or stolen, Bell says, neither Activision nor Blizzard took "the legally required steps to alert" gamers.

Bell seeks class damages and an injunction to bar the defendants from "tacking on" undisclosed costs after customers have bought games, and from requiring them to sign up for Battle.net accounts.

The class is represented by Hank Bates with Carney Williams Bates Pulliam & Bowman, of Little Rock, Ark.

Activision Blizzard did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment.









http://www.courthous...11/08/52109.htm

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lawsuit alleges Blizzard "deceptively and unfairly" charged players to secure their data.

Blizzard is being sued over the Battle.net authentication used in multiple games including Diablo III. A class action suit led by plaintiff Benjamin Bell is seeking damages for "consumer fraud, unjust enrichment, negligence, breach of contract and bailment," claiming that Blizzard is "deceptively and unfairly" charging some users to secure their data from hackers.

Bell is specifically referring to Blizzard’s $6.50 keychain authenticators, alleging that Blizzard has made $26 million by selling them. The suit accuses Blizzard of unfairly requiring users to use Battle.net and says the company has continued to “negligently, deliberately, and/or recklessly fail to ensure that adequate, reasonable procedures safeguard the private information stored on this website.” Bell points to multiple hacking incidents -- including May’s Diablo III hacks -- as evidence that Blizzard failed to take "the legally required steps to alert" players.

Bell is seeking damages and an injunction to bar Blizzard from “tacking on” costs after games have already been purchased. He also seeks to stop Blizzard from requiring players to sign up for a Battle.net account.

We reached out to Blizzard about the suit and a spokesperson sent IGN the following statement:

"This suit is without merit and filled with patently false information, and we will vigorously defend ourselves through the appropriate legal channels.

We want to reiterate that we take the security of our players’ data very seriously, and we’re fully committed to defending our network infrastructure. We also recognize that the cyber-threat landscape is always evolving, and we’re constantly working to track the latest developments and make improvements to our defenses.

The suit’s claim that we didn’t properly notify players regarding the August 2012 security breach is not true. Not only did Blizzard act quickly to provide information to the public about the situation, we explained the actions we were taking and let players know how the incident affected them, including the fact that no names, credit card numbers, or other sensitive financial information was disclosed. You can read our letter to players and a comprehensive FAQ related to the situation on our website.

The suit also claims that the Battle.net Authenticator is required in order to maintain a minimal level of security on the player’s Battle.net account information that’s stored on Blizzard’s network systems. This claim is also completely untrue and apparently based on a misunderstanding of the Authenticator’s purpose. The Battle.net Authenticator is an optional tool that players can use to further protect their Battle.net accounts in the event that their login credentials are compromised outside of Blizzard’s network infrastructure. Available as a physical device or as a free app for iOS or Android devices, it offers players an added level of security against account-theft attempts that stem from sources such as phishing attacks, viruses packaged with seemingly harmless file downloads, and websites embedded with malicious code.

When a player attaches an Authenticator to his or her account, it means that logging in to Battle.net will require the use of a random code generated by the Authenticator in addition to the player’s login credentials. This helps our systems identify when it’s actually the player who is logging in and not someone who might have stolen the player’s credentials by means of one of the external theft measures mentioned above, or as a result of the player using the same account name and password on another website or service that was compromised. Considering that players are ultimately responsible for securing their own computers, and that the extra step required by the Authenticator is an added inconvenience during the log in process, we ultimately leave it up to the players to decide whether they want to add an Authenticator to their account. However, we always strongly encourage it, and we try to make it as easy as possible to do.

Many players have voiced strong approval for our security-related efforts. Blizzard deeply appreciates the outpouring of support it has received from its players related to the frivolous claims in this particular suit."














http://ca.ign.com/ar...-authentication


#2 CactuzJak

CactuzJak

    Neowinian

  • Joined: 02-December 01
  • Location: Kitchener Ontario Canada
  • OS: Windows 8.1
  • Phone: Cyanogen Mod 7.1

Posted 10 November 2012 - 17:22

Dumb. #1 It's optional and not mandatory. #2 It's a free app on smart phones. #3 You're not actually paying for a physical authenticator if you get one you're paying for the shipping. #4 Dumb.

#3 Deleted Bye

Deleted Bye

    Neowinian Senior

  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 10 November 2012 - 17:24

some people just don't get it.... Its a device to help the end user keep their password safe from forces OUTSIDE blizzards control.

side note: been playing for 6 years WITHOUT an authenticator and not once had my password compromised. For those without malwarebytes pro, yes, use an authenticator! ;)

#4 Krome

Krome

    Neowinian God!

  • Joined: 29-August 01

Posted 10 November 2012 - 17:26

lol @ reason #4

#5 HawkMan

HawkMan

    Neowinian Senior

  • Tech Issues Solved: 4
  • Joined: 31-August 04
  • Location: Norway
  • Phone: Noka Lumia 1020

Posted 10 November 2012 - 18:45

some people just don't get it.... Its a device to help the end user keep their password safe from forces OUTSIDE blizzards control.

side note: been playing for 6 years WITHOUT an authenticator and not once had my password compromised. For those without malwarebytes pro, yes, use an authenticator! ;)


If you use more than one PC and/or move your laptop between two or more locations you pretty much need an authenticator or Blizzard will close your account for suspicious behavior or possibly having been hacked. Happened to both me and my GF several times now before we just added the authenticator to our smart phones, which is annoying since we both have secure passwords and this adds another annoying step to logon, granted you only need to really do it once per computer but still.

And you don't need malwarebytes to be secure, you just need common sense,

#6 ir0nw0lf

ir0nw0lf

    Neowinian Fanatic

  • Joined: 22-August 01
  • Location: Pensacola, FL, USA

Posted 10 November 2012 - 22:32

If you use more than one PC and/or move your laptop between two or more locations you pretty much need an authenticator or Blizzard will close your account for suspicious behavior or possibly having been hacked.

Rubbish. Might happen to a small portion of people. I have D3 and/or SC2 and/or WoW on one machine at home, one at work for years, no issues at all, no software/hardware authenticators ever.

#7 Deleted Bye

Deleted Bye

    Neowinian Senior

  • Joined: 17-June 09

Posted 11 November 2012 - 07:55

If you use more than one PC and/or move your laptop between two or more locations you pretty much need an authenticator or Blizzard will close your account for suspicious behavior or possibly having been hacked. Happened to both me and my GF several times now before we just added the authenticator to our smart phones, which is annoying since we both have secure passwords and this adds another annoying step to logon, granted you only need to really do it once per computer but still.

And you don't need malwarebytes to be secure, you just need common sense,

common sense comes in many many forms, some of which not everyone has, including you, and including me. I have 3 machines that i play wow on, not including my sons laptop so that makes 4. No log in issues.Maybe you are doing it wrong.

#8 Jub Fequois

Jub Fequois

    Owlblood

  • Joined: 06-June 04
  • Location: London, UK
  • OS: OS X, Windows
  • Phone: OnePlus One

Posted 11 November 2012 - 08:56

This just took the prize as most ridiculous lawsuit ever.

#9 uMadRabbit

uMadRabbit

    Neowinian Senior

  • Joined: 03-January 12

Posted 11 November 2012 - 09:04

Since when does Battle.net actually force you to use it? Oh wait...it doesn't. Been playing SC2 on 3 different PC's and no problems what so ever.

#10 HawkMan

HawkMan

    Neowinian Senior

  • Tech Issues Solved: 4
  • Joined: 31-August 04
  • Location: Norway
  • Phone: Noka Lumia 1020

Posted 11 November 2012 - 09:25

common sense comes in many many forms, some of which not everyone has, including you, and including me. I have 3 machines that i play wow on, not including my sons laptop so that makes 4. No log in issues.Maybe you are doing it wrong.


Nope, Blizzard even said it was because we moved our laptops and used multiple computers.

#11 Xoligy

Xoligy

    Neowinian

  • Joined: 09-May 10

Posted 11 November 2012 - 09:25

Sorry

common sense comes in many many forms, some of which not everyone has, including you, and including me. I have 3 machines that i play wow on, not including my sons laptop so that makes 4. No log in issues.Maybe you are doing it wrong.

If your using the same IP with the laptops you should not have any issues its when you change ips like myself because i use a VPN service. I have contacted blizzard twice about being locked out and the annoyance its caused me at having to change passwords for them to send two copy and pasted emails saying the same crap that its there for my added security to protect me against hackers and even then its taken five days per email to be responded too (probably because others are complaining).

As for the optional authenticator its overpriced and 9/10 cases just gathers dust its a waste of money and could be sent for users at a lower price.

"Free" smart phone app, another pointless thing that would just take up space on a phone that i dont use in fact right now it been off for a month and is sat on the table i see it as bloatware because i would never use it.

All in all i think blizzards "added" security is crap and a nuisance to those that use a vpn service as there is no way to add extra ips or to even turn it off if we wished to do so. Anyway im off for a full english.

#12 seta-san

seta-san

    Neowinian Senior

  • Joined: 17-February 05

Posted 11 November 2012 - 09:35

if blizzard sells them for free and only charges shipping couldn't blizzard save a ton of money and time by shipping them en-masse to walmarts/target/etc to distribute for free to people who buy blizzard games?

#13 OP Asrokhel

Asrokhel

    Neowinian

  • Joined: 05-April 12
  • OS: Windows 8 Pro x64 (testing to see if I keep it or go back to Windows 7)

Posted 11 November 2012 - 12:14

Since when does Battle.net actually force you to use it? Oh wait...it doesn't.


Diablo III comes to mind!

#14 HawkMan

HawkMan

    Neowinian Senior

  • Tech Issues Solved: 4
  • Joined: 31-August 04
  • Location: Norway
  • Phone: Noka Lumia 1020

Posted 11 November 2012 - 12:54

Diablo III comes to mind!


While I haven't played for a while since the game was boring after I finished it once. I was never forced to use a authenticator. I added mine after I stopped playing.

#15 DKAngel

DKAngel

    That i cannot own ....I shall destroy

  • Joined: 20-July 03
  • Location: Perth, Australia

Posted 11 November 2012 - 13:10

i was forced to use one by blizzard after my account was comprimised or they wouldnt reinstate my account, and hell it was thier fault my account was comprimised not mine