Blizzard Sued over Battle.net Authentication


Recommended Posts

Dumb. #1 It's optional and not mandatory.

It is mandatory. Blizzard security is not first class. In fact this is probably one of the less secure online service around.

I got my battle.net account hacked even if i was using a perfectly secure password 10 random digits (numbers and letters with a cap and a special) that was unique. I did not have any keyloggers on my system and did not fall for any scam or phishing. All the addons was clean addons millions of people use like dbm and i downloaded them using my 2nd PC. Never bought money i farm my own things. The PC was clean as it is also my work PC and i never use it to browse sites that are not offcial or forums (like neowin) or to check hotmail or gmail. This is my work PC and it is used to work only (check my work emails, browse msdn and such) and also play games since it is a good machine. I use my 2nd less powerful PC to browse the web and do not so much secure things. I'm 100% sure the breach came from Blizzard side.

I never got hacked ever. Not before not after. Hotmail never hacked. Gmail never hacked. Guild Wars 1 and 2 never hacked. Live never hacked. I think most people using battle.net without an auth got hacked at least once.

I will honestly not shed a tear for Activision Blizzard after faction change. They got greedy and i would call this karma. Well deserved class action lawsuit.

i was forced to use one by blizzard after my account was comprimised or they wouldnt reinstate my account, and hell it was thier fault my account was comprimised not mine

I can't wait to hear your explanation as to how its Blizzard's fault your account was compromised.

I never got hacked ever. Not before not after. Hotmail never hacked. Gmail never hacked. Guild Wars 1 and 2 never hacked. Live never hacked. I think most people using battle.net without an auth got hacked at least once.

Yeah, not even close.

Since Blizzard doesn't even make passwords case sensitive, it opens everyone's accounts up to being hacked rather easily. Doesn't take long for people to brute force a password, especially when you don't have to do capital letters anywhere.

Blizzard has posted time and time agian, if you don't have an Authenticator, you are compromising your account. That if you do get hacked, it will be harder to get anything back because you "Didn't take ALL the avenues to secure it."

Due to blizzard basically saying in the past that an Authenticator is needed to keep your account secure, they have opened themselves up for this.

Doesn't matter what you think, because the law doesn't work that way. There is merit to this suit, although in reality, it is stupid.

capitals doesn't necessarily make your password safer.

password_strength.png

Sure it does. It adds an extra layer of protection. You could have horseapplestaplebattery, or you could have HorseaPPlestaPLEbatterY, which would make it even more complex. It doesn't make sense to leave an option out that only helps strengthen something.

Not sure the lawsuit makes sense, unless the guy wants restitution for the $4 or so it costs to get the authenticator. For those almighty people here saying that the hacking is "Your fault!" not Blizzards, you may want to research the issue and see how many people with and without authenticators have been hacked. I myself was hacked, and had a very very good password for the account as well as an authenticator; now, before you say "well, it had to be your computer!", i give you some info about my pc and me. I am an IT manager who has worked for companies such as Symantec IT internal department, MessageLabs IT internal department and now a private Chemical plant, again internal IT deparment....so with all that in mind, i have made sure that my PC IS as secure and clean as possible, not only for a stupid game, but also to make sure information on my pc is not compromised.

I also ran wow clean, without addons etc, and any updates were all downloaded using the client....so when my account got hacked, i made sure to do before calling blizzard a full forensic analysis of my machine, including firewall logs, av scans, spyware scans, etc, etc, etc......what i found was that my computer was clean, and my account was hacked either directly from Blizzard or my isp had some issues with man in the middle attacks, and blizzards traffic encryption had or has been compromised (do not know which).

So, going back to the suit.....smart? maybe, depends what the person wants, if he wants restitution for the authenticator then sure, have blizzard refund his $4 or so...anything else is a joke, although having blizzard change some of their warnings or making them give out warnings when something does happen like getting hacked would be nice.

While many times it's the user's fault for being hacked, there are times when they truly did nothing wrong.

I have 2 WoW accounts for example, both with strong unique passwords not used anywhere else. My main one has an authenticator on it, and was never hacked. My old one however, despite not being in use anymore, didn't have an authenticator. 2 years of having not logged into that account, I receive an email that the account has been suspended. Not exactly sure what the hell they did to break into the account, as my password was strong, unique, and hadn't even been used for 2 years...

Same thing happened to a friend of mine with his Guild Wars account.

So yeah, I'm quite under the belief that if you don't have an authenticator, you will likely be hacked eventually. Doesn't matter if hasn't happened thus far, it's still possible, even if your account isn't in use.

---

Anyway, I'm definitely no fan of Blizzard these days. Still, I think this case is just straight baloney. :sleep2:

While many times it's the user's fault for being hacked, there are times when they truly did nothing wrong.

I have 2 WoW accounts for example, both with strong unique passwords not used anywhere else. My main one has an authenticator on it, and was never hacked. My old one however, despite not being in use anymore, didn't have an authenticator. 2 years of having not logged into that account, I receive an email that the account has been suspended. Not exactly sure what the hell they did to break into the account, as my password was strong, unique, and hadn't even been used for 2 years...

Same thing happened to a friend of mine with his Guild Wars account.

So yeah, I'm quite under the belief that if you don't have an authenticator, you will likely be hacked eventually. Doesn't matter if hasn't happened thus far, it's still possible, even if your account isn't in use.

---

Anyway, I'm definitely no fan of Blizzard these days. Still, I think this case is just straight baloney. :sleep2:

Are you sure those weren't phishing emails like the ones every gets regardless of if they even play the game?

Are you sure those weren't phishing emails like the ones every gets regardless of if they even play the game?

No, but I do get those as well. I never open them, and they're properly placed in the spam section of Gmail. I worked with Blizzard to have the account restored, simply for the fact that it was my account and I didn't want anyone using it for whatever malicious purposes. Also slapped the iOS authenticator on it for (free) added safety.

Sure it does. It adds an extra layer of protection. You could have horseapplestaplebattery, or you could have HorseaPPlestaPLEbatterY, which would make it even more complex. It doesn't make sense to leave an option out that only helps strengthen something.

But it only makes it more complex to remember.

Are you sure those weren't phishing emails like the ones every gets regardless of if they even play the game?

I know in my case it wasn't. I know which ones are real/fake but even then, for ANY link dealing with accounts, I always check to see if the link is actually valid. I've never had anything hacked before.

This is pretty common with WoW. Lots of people I've known that practice good computer security stopped playing WoW and then had their accounts hacked (they didn't have authenticators). Authenticators are pretty much a requirement now or you're guaranteed to get hacked...

Not by much. And the added security can only help.

Not really, there's a level where security peaks and there's not really a point in adding further security anyway, and it does make it significantly harder to remember when random stuff in the password is upper cased.

Personally my password isn't technically nearly as complex as the base password there. but in reality it's more secure and shorter and doesn't rely on any special cases, and I don't get hacked.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I and many others did not vote to get out of the E.u because of Putin or Farage, we did so for our own reasons. You don't have to tel me what my own did or did not do when it comes to the E.U. The EEC is or was the European Economic Community, a different beast to what the E.U is now.The EEC was a mainly about trading, the E.U have gone far beyond that and as I have said before, is now more of a United States of Europe. The U.K did not vote to join a United States of Europe. Anyway, they did not want us in there in the first place, Charles de Gaulle stopped us joining as he claimed we didn’t agree with the core ideas of integration. He was not wrong and that is why we voted out of the E.U when the time came. I was not old enough to vote the first time. My only regret is that we did not have the referendum years ago and got out years ago. If we rejoined, we would have to agree to join the Euro and no doubt Schengen, agree with freedom of movement, we have enough problem with people coming over here as it is. i have no problem with people coming over here if they work and don't try to push their way of life onto us. The E.U has a currency, freedom of movement, an anthem a flag, a parliament, well they are there, not sure if they do anything. Don't sound like something that is just for trading. Oh yeah, also wanted a euro Army. How many stupid rules have the E.U made that we had to follow? I doubt I will see the Uk rejoin the E.U, which suits me. Oh yeah, my partner is Polish, she came over here before Poland joined the E.U and she got fed up of people just coming over here with ease, while she had to struggle. She is now a British citizen and have been for a fair few years
    • Hello, Paul. Thanks for the editorial. It was interesting. I'm going research more into the app and its concept. Of course, if you know me at all, you know that I'd say your articles needs some editing! I a;ways do, don't I? For instance, the article occasionally mentions a concept before defining it, e.g., relays.
    • Screamer is 50% off on Steam, making it £24.99 here in the UK: https://store.steampowered.com/app/2814990/Screamer/ You might remember the series from the mid 90s / early 2000s, this new game is also by Milestone who created the older games.
    • U.S. partially reverses Anthropic AI ban for Mythos but keeps Fable 5 off the market by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic says that the U.S. government has finally allowed it to restore Claude Mythos 5. But of course, there's a catch. The rollout is again for a limited set of U.S. organizations that operate and defend critical infrastructure. The company announced this in a post on X (formerly Twitter). This does not mean that Anthropic's latest frontier models are back to normal availability. Fable 5, which was a tuned version of Mythos 5 for public release, remains unavailable. Anthropic said that it is still working with the government to expand Mythos 5 access and make Fable 5 available again, but there's no timeline. Reports from Bloomberg and Reuters say that this decision actually came through a letter from the U.S. Commerce Department. According to Reuters, this would allow more than 100 companies and institutions access to Mythos 5. Reuters also reported that Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s letter removes the need for export licenses for approved companies’ non-US citizen employees, as well as Anthropic’s own non-US citizen employees, while restrictions remain for organizations outside the approved list. Anthropic isn't alone with this kind of controlled rollout. OpenAI's newest model family, GPT 5.6, was announced just yesterday, but isn't available for everyone yet. In its announcement, OpenAI also said that access to these models is initially limited to a select group of trusted partners and organizations, with broader access planned later this year. Both of these cases show that frontier AI launches are no longer just ordinary product releases and more like slow and vetted deployments shaped heavily by the U.S. government.
    • Sol, Terra, Luna - aren't those the names of failed crypto coins? 🤣🤣🤣
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!