Windows 8 Start Screen is horrible (mark ii)


Recommended Posts

MS biggest mistake with windows 8 is getting rid of start menu, if they wanted the useless start screen they could easily have kept both. Desktop should not be treated as a app, there should be easy way to disable "hot corners" and "handle on top" when in desktop mode. start screen should not "slap" you in face each time start the PC, there is no reason for it not to boot straight into desktop on your DESKTOP PC.

apps like startisback, start8 and numerous other apps that bring back the good old start menu are proof enough that a lot of people don't like the changes made, desktop and laptop pcs should not run/feel like tablets.

Desktop-like envirolment failed on mobile device (example windows mobile 6.x) who is the idiot at MS that thought that tablet interface will work on desktop.

bring back the start menu in windows 9!!

bring back the start menu in windows 9!!

Good luck. I've adapted to the Start Screen and am now more productive with it. When I use XP at work the Start menu just feels backwards to me.

I hope you packed a seriously thick pair of flameproof pants, because a lot of our users positions are that Windows 8 is awesome in every way and it's your fault for refusing to adapt, because all change is completely awesome.

[. . .] if they wanted the useless start screen [. . .]

That comment means to me that your views have little credibility; your post indicates that you don't understand the Start screen concept because you're not aware of its uses, and what you've provided is not constructive criticism. Everyone should acknowledge that the Start screen has its uses, even if they dislike it, because it has many of the same uses the Start Menu did (e.g. allowing one to open apps). If you found the Start Menu useful, you have to find the Start screen useful in the same ways the Start Menu is. Constructive criticism, however, would be pointing out that the Start screen covers you entire screen, which is something the Start Menu didn't do (that could be a point that leads you to feel the Start Menu is more useful than the Start screen; however, some of us feel that the Start screen is more useful than the Start Menu because of some features it has which the Start Menu didn't have, so that's when we'd reply to that point of yours with the reasons as to why we disagree).

That comment means to me that your views have no credibility and what you've provided is not constructive criticism. Everyone should acknowledge that the Start screen has its uses, even if they dislike it, because it has many of the same uses the Start Menu did (e.g. allowing one to open apps). If you found the Start Menu useful, you have to find the Start screen useful in the same ways the Start Menu is. Constructive criticism, however, would be pointing out that the Start screen covers you entire screen, which is something the Start Menu didn't do (that could be a point that leads you to feel the Start Menu is more useful than the Start screen).

We should acknowledge it on what basis? because you say so. Forgive my bluntness but did someone die and make you the sole arbiter of deciding other people's usability factors?

I hope you packed a seriously thick pair of flameproof pants, because a lot of our users positions are that Windows 8 is awesome in every way and it's your fault for refusing to adapt, because all change is completely awesome.

I've been using Windows 8 since it launched. Let me give you my pros and cons on the start screen

1) Searching for an app by just typing once you press start is an improvement over the old start / programs

2) Pinning folders to the start screen is useful

Cons

1) Every time I Press start and it covers my entire screen I get annoyed.

2) The fact they hid every start button / charms button is annoying.

Over all not as annoying as it use to be, but the full screen thing still bugs me.

That comment means to me that your views have no credibility and what you've provided is not constructive criticism.

useless on desktop, does that make you feel better? desktop-like ui on mobile device failed, tablet/mobile ui on desktop simply doesn't belong.

I hope you packed a seriously thick pair of flameproof pants, because a lot of our users positions are that Windows 8 is awesome in every way and it's your fault for refusing to adapt, because all change is completely awesome.

what can you expect from the "xbox" generation.

We should acknowledge it on what basis? because you say so. Forgive my bluntness but did someone die and make you the sole arbiter of deciding other people's usability factors?

Can you open the menu and launch an app? Yes...therefore it has a use, and thus is useful.

You can debate the user-friendliness of that functionality, but to deny it has a use is to deny reality.

So to answer your question? Reality made Calum the arbiter...

I've been using Windows 8 since it launched. Let me give you my pros and cons on the start screen

1) Searching for an app by just typing once you press start is an improvement over the old start / programs

2) Pinning folders to the start screen is useful

Cons

1) Every time I Press start and it covers my entire screen I get annoyed.

2) The fact they hid every start button / charms button is annoying.

Over all not as annoying as it use to be, but the full screen thing still bugs me.

The biggest annoyances for me are the fact that it covers the whole screen, the fact that in my opinion it's very unappealing visually (Dull colour blocks and gradients are so 1990s), and the lack of folder support that you get in a conventional start menu. The bonuses? For a desktop PC, very few in my opinion but I suppose the tablet market is helped by more competition.

useless on desktop, does that make you feel better? desktop-like ui on mobile device failed, tablet/mobile ui on desktop simply doesn't belong.

[. . .]

No, because it works the same on a desktop PC as it does on a tablet; thus, it has the same uses on a desktop PC that the Start Menu had.

useless on desktop, does that make you feel better? desktop-like ui on mobile device failed, tablet/mobile ui on desktop simply doesn't belong.

what can you expect from the "xbox" generation.

Huh...weird I use mine on a non-touch based desktop and laptop on a daily basis, and get more work done using both Metro & Desktop UI environments...how weird.

As regards 'xbox' generation...I'd be willing to bet you're younger than me...which would put you firmly in that generation as well.

bring back the start menu in windows 9!!

I agree the start screen is a desktop abomination, but honestly I don't particularly care about the start menu.

As far as I'm concerned they can replace it with whatever, just so long as it's not full-screen and doesn't try to force-feed me a UI I have no use for.

MS biggest mistake with windows 8 is getting rid of start menu, if they wanted the useless start screen they could easily have kept both. Desktop should not be treated as a app, there should be easy way to disable "hot corners" and "handle on top" when in desktop mode. start screen should not "slap" you in face each time start the PC, there is no reason for it not to boot straight into desktop on your DESKTOP PC.

apps like startisback, start8 and numerous other apps that bring back the good old start menu are proof enough that a lot of people don't like the changes made, desktop and laptop pcs should not run/feel like tablets.

Desktop-like envirolment failed on mobile device (example windows mobile 6.x) who is the idiot at MS that thought that tablet interface will work on desktop.

bring back the start menu in windows 9!!

There are a million of these threads here on Neowin. We don't need another one.

  • Like 2

We should acknowledge it on what basis? because you say so. Forgive my bluntness but did someone die and make you the sole arbiter of deciding other people's usability factors?

Tiles on the Start screen can be clicked by anyone who has a mouse and working hands. Therefore, it has the same use, in terms of opening programs, that the Start Menu had. Therefore, it cannot reasonably be deemed useless.

I'm not sure whether you missed my point or not.

Tiles on the Start screen can be clicked by anyone who has a mouse and working hands. Therefore, it has the same use, in terms of opening programs, that the Start Menu had. Therefore, it cannot reasonably be deemed useless.

I'm not sure whether you missed my point or not.

Yes, it can be used to launch applications. That doesn't mean it's a change for the better however.

I'll just leave this here....

post-420821-0-94064100-1352829621.png

Pretty much only relevant to people that own a tablet. Which I do not, nor do I ever intend to buy a Windows 8 tablet.

Yes, it can be used to launch applications. That doesn't mean it's a change for the better however.

That wasn't the point being made. The point being made is that it has a use, thus is useful.

To claim that it's not useful is to deny reality itself...which is what Calum was trying to say...that someone cannot be taken seriously if they espouse the view that something isn't useful just because they don't like the way that it can be used.

Yes, it can be used to launch applications. That doesn't mean it's a change for the better however.

[. . .]

That wasn't my point :) I completely understand that some people prefer the Start Menu, especially for the reason that it doesn't fully cover their screen. I just wanted to point out to him that his credibility is in jeopardy for stating that the Start screen is "useless," as that denies reality.

EDIT: Shane Nokes is explaining my point better than I am :p

I'll just leave this here....

post-420821-0-94064100-1352829621.png

Start menu doesn't work with 'remote input' i.e. keyboard? What a crock of ****, windows 95 onwards works FINE with a keyboard, you don't even need a mouse.

I've not tried the start screen since removing W8 but how well does that work with a keyboard? '****' is all I can think of really.

Start menu not customisable? I can add/remove items/folders and functions just as you can on the start screen, it's got the same customisation. Oh no actually that's a lie, I can switch between classic and W7 start menu in W7 which ironically makes the start menu MORE customisable than the start screen!

Expandability? I can't see any relevance.

Yeah start menu isn't touch friendly I'll agree, it's an utter pain in the arse trying to use it via RDP on an ipod touch.

Tiles on the Start screen can be clicked by anyone who has a mouse and working hands. Therefore, it has the same use, in terms of opening programs, that the Start Menu had. Therefore, it cannot reasonably be deemed useless.

I'm not sure whether you missed my point or not.

But I should have to move the mouse. It's not what it was designed for.

Wait... :rofl:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft Edge gets tons of security features, including AI model that can see your screen by Usama Jawad Microsoft Edge may not be the most popular browser out there, but it does receive quite frequent updates that sometimes bring surprising new features and axe others that are not as popular. Now, Microsoft has detailed some of the new security enhancements that it has introduced in Edge for Business, typically used by commercial customers. Microsoft has emphasized that security features are baked into Edge for Business and offer native integration with security and governance tools like Defender and Purview. Browser sessions are governed by default on managed devices but can also be governed through dedicated work profiles on unmanaged devices. An important aspect in this area is controlling the use of shadow AI. We have talked about this before, but it essentially restricts employees from using unsanctioned AI apps through data loss prevention (DLP) policies, with Edge redirecting them to trusted AI services like Microsoft 365 Copilot. This feature, available as a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) license, ensures that confidential data never exits AI boundaries set by your organization in Purview. Additionally, Microsoft also has strong DLP policies for contractors. Contractors leveraging a Entra ID-joined work profile provisioned by their contracting company on a device managed by their actual employer can be restricted from downloading files locally. In such scenarios, the file is saved on the contracting firm's OneDrive rather than being downloaded locally. Another useful Edge security feature disallows copying and pasting from unmanaged locations and apps. Similarly, DLP policies can be configured at a granular level to restrict screenshots or downloading of files from certain locations. In the same vein, IT admins can block the installation of extensions, hosted apps, themes and scripts, and control if users can install extensions from external locations. They can also enable the installation of specific extensions and allow users to request access to certain extensions, so that they can be managed on a case-by-case basis. Finally, Edge for Business now has an on-device AI model that uses computer vision to see what's on your screen and block potentially malicious content immediately. This does not rely on site reputation, as it simply monitors what is being displayed on your screen, which means that it is effective against malicious content that takes over your screen and employs scareware tactics. Since this is an on-device AI model, it does use your system's resources, so it's enabled by default only on devices with at least 2GB of RAM and four CPU cores. You can find more details in the Microsoft Mechanics video here.
    • Could you come up with a slightly less depressing background for Tux instead of that gray gradient? Doesn't have to be cheerful, just less of a downer...
    • Linux 7.2's first release candidate gets off to a good start by Paul Hill Credit: Larry Ewing It has been a few weeks since the release of Linux 7.1, and in that time, the Linux 7.2 merge window has been open, where developers can submit their features and patches ready for the upcoming release. That window is now shut, and the release candidate phase has begun so that new features can be tested and further fixes applied. According to the founder of Linux, Linus Torvalds, this week’s release candidate looks “reasonably normal”. Although we are super early in the release candidates, this is a good sign as it makes it more likely that an eighth release candidate will not be needed. Torvalds even mentioned that the update’s stats are only larger than they really are because there was another AMD header drop with a third of the patch just being AMD GPU register definitions, which aren’t big changes but make the code contributed look larger overall. In addition to this, he noted that just over half the patch is drivers, even when excluding the AMD register dump. The rest of the changes are spread out over architecture updates, tooling, documentation, and core kernel updates. In the next week, Torvalds says that he will be chilling out, taking the week “mostly off”. Despite this, he will be reading emails and keeping up with things, so if he is slow responding, now you know why. He said he is hoping for a calm week, but we will just have to see if the second release candidate is actually like that. We should expect seven or eight release candidates before Linux 7.2 is released, so expect it around the end of August. If you missed it a few weeks ago, be sure to check out our coverage of Linux 7.1's release.
    • Ridiculous claim that the labor cost difference of $6000 annually would increase cost per phone by $200. The employees produce 3 phones per month or what?
    • Sparkle 2.20.1 by Razvan Serea Sparkle is a free, open-source Windows optimization tool designed to make your PC faster, cleaner, and more private. With Sparkle, you can easily debloat Windows by removing unnecessary apps and services, disable Microsoft tracking to enhance privacy, and apply performance tweaks to boost speed. Its cleaner removes junk and temporary files, while every change is safe and fully reversible. Sparkle also features a modern, user-friendly interface with automatic updates, making system maintenance simple. Explore over 39 tweaks, from disabling telemetry and hibernation to optimizing network and game settings, all aimed at customizing and enhancing your Windows experience. Sparkle supports Windows 10 and 11. Sparkle 2.20.1 changelog: You can now change the Animation Direction from Up, Left, or Off. Added configurable animation direction (Up, Left, Off) for improved accessibility Added TTL caching to the system info backend Refactored tweak application flow to await NvidiaProfileInspector Improved IPC listener cleanup to correctly remove specific listeners Fixed online status not updating after successful network requests Updated system info tests to support backend caching Removed electron-toolkit utils dependency in favor of internal is.dev helper Fixed unwanted files and folders being included in application bundles Download: Sparkle 2.20.1 | Portable | ~100.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Sparkle Website | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Zeynel earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      JKR earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dedicated
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      246
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      86
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!