Recommended Posts

I need to do some online test and its such a ****ty tests because it won't let you do the test unless you have a compatible operating system / browser. I have Windows 8 and tried Chrome, IE 10 and firefox and nothing works.

Anyone know how to trick a website into thinking you have Windows 7? I tried user agent string but that only fools it into thinking you have a different browser and also causes different problems...

SSSSOOO frustrating wth..

Just run whatever OS you need to test with in a VM, that is prob your best option for testing with a "compatible" OS ;)

But the OS is included in the useragent string - so you should be able to change it to "trick" the website - does not mean what your testing will work if your not really on that OS, etc.

There are a few addons for firefox that let you easy change the useragent string.

Just run whatever OS you need to test with in a VM, that is prob your best option for testing with a "compatible" OS ;)

But the OS is included in the useragent string - so you should be able to change it to "trick" the website - does not mean what your testing will work if your not really on that OS, etc.

There are a few addons for firefox that let you easy change the useragent string.

None of the add-ons let appear to let me change the OS, only the browser. Which add-on you referring to?

Yeah, its so annoying, its just some online test for a job and they are making it incredibly difficult to even start the test...

EDIT: I've managed to get it working using the user agent string in chrome. How do I save the setting permanently though so I don't have to keep the developer window up?

Like BudMan said, it's probably a user agent string check. You should just be able to install an addon for Firefox or Chrome that will create a fake one for you that will tell the site you're running Windows 7 or IE9. I'm pretty sure you can set the user agent to whatever you like in Internet Explorer too by editing the registry. I don't know how up-to-date this article is (It talks about Firefox 2 and IE7), but it might help: http://whatsmyuseragent.com/SwitchingUserAgents.asp

When you've done the test, email the webmaster and tell them to use feature detection instead of browser sniffing. Every time a UA-string is parsed, god kills a kitten.

"UA-string is parsed, god kills a kitten."

dude if that was the case - there wouldn't be any kittens

post-14624-0-66894800-1352846544.jpg

This a simple report on different UA hitting web fiitering for 1 customer I support, and they are not even that big ;) for just today!!

I would have to lookup an exact addon - but you can see in this example from couple of lines in the report

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; MS-RTC LM 8)

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; InfoPath.2; MS-RTC LM 8)

That OS is included in the UA

"UA-string is parsed, god kills a kitten."

dude if that was the case - there wouldn't be any kittens

I didn't mean just storing it, I meant parsing it as a way of determining if a browser is capable of running a website. Websites that "forbid" certain browsers usually do it (in my brief experience) because of IE-specific features that were added later in other browsers, or vice-versa :p

Incidentally, poor browser sniffing practices are the whole reason that all web browsers start with "Mozilla" :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yes, it was amusing at the time because even then dbrand was well known for stealing the designs of products from other companies. That’s what they do.
    • Didn’t Dbrand once complain that Casetify was ripping off their designs a well? seems pretty bad of them to try and get around Valve’s copyright this way with that in mind.
    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed by David Uzondu Image via Dbrand Dbrand has cancelled its highly anticipated Companion Cube enclosure for the Valve Steam Machine, which it teased back in November of last year with a concept render and sign-up page, because it did not ask Valve for permission first before manufacturing the case. According to Dbrand, it took the "backwards approach" of building the product first before asking for permission from the copyright holder. Seven months of work went into the project, requiring over a thousand engineering hours from the design team. Workers developed forty-four sets of injection molding tools, making a unique mold for each sub-component of the crate. When the Companion Cube went live on Monday last week, it, according to Dbrand, quickly became the second-fastest-selling product in the company's fifteen-year history, racking up orders for hundreds of thousands of units. Customers eagerly bought the $129.95 deluxe edition or the bare-bones $99.95 version, which the manufacturer cheekily branded as the "Poverty Cube". It was around this time that the legal eagles at Valve descended on the accessory maker with a formal demand. The developer pointed out that the iconic block design remains protected intellectual property from the game Portal, so unlicensed sales had to stop. Dbrand said that all its pleas to salvage the project with the Valve team, including proposals to run a properly licensed release under official terms "with their blessing", fell on deaf ears, so it had no choice but to obey and remove every trace of the product from the internet. If you bought the enclosure, the company said that banks will process your refund by the end of this week, but if it still hasn't arrived in your account by then, you should not hesitate to contact support. The Steam Machine itself is a high-performance console that Valve designed directly to bring PC gaming into the living room. It was announced on 12th November 2025 (the same day Dbrand announced the Cube) and runs on the Linux-based SteamOS, the same OS that powers the Steam Deck. As for the price, due to the shortage of memory and storage chips, the hardware cost landed much higher than people were expecting, starting at $1,049 for the 512 model (without a controller) or $1,128 with the new gamepad. The premium 2 TB model pushes those prices even higher, selling at $1,349 for the standalone console and hitting $1,428 if you want the bundle.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      57
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!