• 0

What's the deal with Visual Studio 2012 bloat?

Asked by +Majesticmerc,

 Share

Question

Grand Master

+Majesticmerc MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted

So it goes like this. At work we have a Ruby script that allows us to create a project file for a project that works with any version of Visual Studio between 2003 and 2010. For example, I could run the command...

ruby ProjectFileConverter.rb --dir="C:\Dev\MyProject" --in=2005 --out=2010

... and it would find the Visual Studio 2005 project file(s) and create corresponding Visual Studio 2010 files. Since the de-facto Visual Studio install at work is VS2008 abd we skipped 2010m we are planning to migrate straight to 2012. I was asked to update the script to create VS2012 files. Easy enough.

To test my changes, I had to install a copy of the VS2012 trial. Now though, since we don't have any licenses for 2012 yet, and the trial has expired, I've chosen to remove 2012 completely. The thing is, I'm STILL trying to do it! I uninstalled VS2012 itself easy enough, but it installed SO. MUCH. EXTRA. STUFF. I count no less than THIRTY FIVE extra products installed. Silverlight, SQL this, SQL that, ASP.NET, ASP.NET MVC, the list goes on, and on, and on. And does VS2012 uninstall them all for you automatically? Of course not!

Absolutely ridiculous.

</rant>

(I'm not expecting any help or anything, just needed to get it off my chest)

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Grand Master

+Majesticmerc MVC

Posted
  • Author
  • MVC
Posted

About half way through, this is still what's left (Except VirtualCloneDrive obviously):

post-125341-0-28920900-1352845103.png

Can you not choose the technologies that you install during the setup? I'm sure there's a screen for it.

No :( It just asked me to close down Visual Studio 2008 (which was weird), but then it just uninstalled Visual Studio itself. All the dependencies (or some of them anyway) remained :(

  • 0
Grand Master

+LogicalApex MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted

This has always been the case with Visual Studio and you always need to read the Release Notes for what to do when it came time to tear it down.

The best I could easily find for you references the BETA so it seems MS has slacked and isn't keeping this data refreshed as they should.

Visual Studio 2012 Tear Down

  • +Majesticmerc
  • Like 1
  • 0
Grand Master

Mr. Gibs

Posted
Posted
STILL trying to do it! I uninstalled VS2012 itself easy enough, but it installed SO. MUCH. EXTRA. STUFF. I count no less than THIRTY FIVE extra products installed. Silverlight, SQL this, SQL that, ASP.NET, ASP.NET MVC, the list goes on, and on, and on. And does VS2012 uninstall them all for you automatically? Of course not!

Lol holy **** :| I knew VS came with a lot of stuff but I figured it would come with a single uninstaller.

Also, I could be wrong since it's been a while, but don't you get the option of installing all those extras?

  • 0
Grand Master

+LogicalApex MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted

Thanks! Still though, I'm disappointed that there wasn't a screen in the uninstaller to do it for us :(

Agreed. I have always hated this about VS installs. As not only do they lay this long list of stuff to remove they also make it even more annoying in that the order is also important. The whole purpose of an uninstaller is to return the machine to the state prior to the install, but I guess MS never got that memo :angry:

  • 0
Grand Master

Eric Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

There's a command line option to uninstall the supporting packages. You can just download the web installer and run it with the options "/uninstall /force"

Every version other than Express should display a page during installation that lets you select which components you want.

  • 0
Grand Master

+Majesticmerc MVC

Posted
  • Author
  • MVC
Posted

Lol holy **** :| I knew VS came with a lot of stuff but I figured it would come with a single uninstaller.

Also, I could be wrong since it's been a while, but don't you get the option of installing all those extras?

There's a command line option to uninstall the supporting packages. You can just download the web installer and run it with the options "/uninstall /force"

Every version other than Express should display a page during installation that lets you select which components you want.

There was a screen during the install for selecting packages, but most of these packages weren't available to select, they got installed "silently" with other parts of the install.

The thing is, I get why these things don't get automatically uninstalled, because other applications might use them (SQL Express for instance, of the Silverlight SDK), but at the same time VS should at least keep track of what it installed and offer the option to uninstall them. Even if they're not selected by default.

(Happy Birthday GreyWolf!)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to question listing

  • Posts

    • Tidal won't monetize AI slop music, company says

      By monterxz · Posted

      I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States

      By Cosmocronos · Posted

      “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots

      By Usama Jawad96 · Posted

      Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware

      By +Warwagon · Posted

      With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • Meta is reusing old DDR4 RAM in its servers instead of buying new hardware

      By C:Amie · Posted

      It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...

  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!