Recommended Posts

I'm running exchange 2010 at home to learn more about AD and IT setups. I've set up an Ubuntu VM that sits in front of the exchange server, running Postfix/Spamassassin/Pyzor/Razor/DCC/CLAMAV/Mailscanner to weed out spam and viruses. While the setup works great at reducing nearly 100% of all spam, theres an issue with the vm sending messages to myself

post-26332-0-47766900-1353004471.png

I've set up the receive connector in exchange to only allow access from the VM for SMTP, so that nothing else can directly access exchange. I have no issues receiving email from anywhere on the internet, but if I try to send email from the ubuntu vm (logs, etc), Exchange seems to bounce or reject the message, with the following showing in the logs:

<myemail@mydomain>: host 192.168.0.3[192.168.0.3] said: 501 5.1.7 Invalid address(in reply to MAIL FROM command)

If I look in the root mail account on ubuntu, i see the following:


Final-Recipient: rfc822; <[email protected]>
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.7
Remote-MTA: dns; 192.168.0.3
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 501 5.1.7 Invalid Address
.
.
.
.
To: [email protected]
From: root
Subject: Logwatch for ubuntu (Linux)
[/CODE]

I already enabled anonymous users to access the receiver connector, so why is exchange rejecting mail from the root user?

why would exchange accept email from "root" That is not a valid email address, [email protected] would be valid email address.

To: [email protected]

From: root

Subject: Logwatch for ubuntu (Linux)"

why would exchange accept email from "root" That is not a valid email address, [email protected] would be valid email address.

To: [email protected]

From: root

Subject: Logwatch for ubuntu (Linux)"

that's what ubuntu is sending as. Shouldn't the "anonymous" access allow any sending party to access the SMTP server? I thought about that, since "root" is just a account name, and not a proper address, but I don't know how to change it.

Organization -> Hub Transport -> Send Connectors:

post-26332-0-58909200-1353018529.png

post-26332-0-63993800-1353018531.png

post-26332-0-67988700-1353018533.png

post-26332-0-65627800-1353018535.png

Server Configuration -> Hub Transport -> Receive Connectors:

post-26332-0-21955000-1353018537.png

post-26332-0-32719200-1353018539.png

post-26332-0-32627000-1353018541.png

post-26332-0-22416500-1353018543.png

I would agree with budman that the email address "root" is the problem. You would have to change it with the format of [email protected]. Budmans instructions should do that for you. The receive connector should work for you. The send connector is fine. in exchange 2007 they incorporated a block from unauthenticated sources to send mail outside of the domain.

In exchange powershell (there is no gui check box or setting you can make to enable this):

Get-ReceiveConnector "modelxposure.com" | Add-ADPermission -User "NT AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS LOGON" -ExtendedRights "ms-Exch-SMTP-Accept-Any-Recipient"

Looking at the initial diagram, your Linux box is 192.168.0.2, but on the receive connector on exchange you don't have that IP listed. Also for an internal machine to send to exchange direct (i.e. not through outlook so not AD secured) then you have to enable 'externally secured (For example with IPsec)' so that the connection will be permitted, as your box sending an email is acting as a client in this scenario and not a relay server.

See screenshot:

post-325730-0-58598200-1353071751.jpg

Sorry ignore me, this is for relaying through the server, doh!

and this being in the rejection message confirms for me the format of the from address is to blame:

<myemail@mydomain>: host 192.168.0.3[192.168.0.3] said: 501 5.1.7 Invalid address(in reply to MAIL FROM command)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Yes, it was amusing at the time because even then dbrand was well known for stealing the designs of products from other companies. That’s what they do.
    • Didn’t Dbrand once complain that Casetify was ripping off their designs a well? seems pretty bad of them to try and get around Valve’s copyright this way with that in mind.
    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed by David Uzondu Image via Dbrand Dbrand has cancelled its highly anticipated Companion Cube enclosure for the Valve Steam Machine, which it teased back in November of last year with a concept render and sign-up page, because it did not ask Valve for permission first before manufacturing the case. According to Dbrand, it took the "backwards approach" of building the product first before asking for permission from the copyright holder. Seven months of work went into the project, requiring over a thousand engineering hours from the design team. Workers developed forty-four sets of injection molding tools, making a unique mold for each sub-component of the crate. When the Companion Cube went live on Monday last week, it, according to Dbrand, quickly became the second-fastest-selling product in the company's fifteen-year history, racking up orders for hundreds of thousands of units. Customers eagerly bought the $129.95 deluxe edition or the bare-bones $99.95 version, which the manufacturer cheekily branded as the "Poverty Cube". It was around this time that the legal eagles at Valve descended on the accessory maker with a formal demand. The developer pointed out that the iconic block design remains protected intellectual property from the game Portal, so unlicensed sales had to stop. Dbrand said that all its pleas to salvage the project with the Valve team, including proposals to run a properly licensed release under official terms "with their blessing", fell on deaf ears, so it had no choice but to obey and remove every trace of the product from the internet. If you bought the enclosure, the company said that banks will process your refund by the end of this week, but if it still hasn't arrived in your account by then, you should not hesitate to contact support. The Steam Machine itself is a high-performance console that Valve designed directly to bring PC gaming into the living room. It was announced on 12th November 2025 (the same day Dbrand announced the Cube) and runs on the Linux-based SteamOS, the same OS that powers the Steam Deck. As for the price, due to the shortage of memory and storage chips, the hardware cost landed much higher than people were expecting, starting at $1,049 for the 512 model (without a controller) or $1,128 with the new gamepad. The premium 2 TB model pushes those prices even higher, selling at $1,349 for the standalone console and hitting $1,428 if you want the bundle.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      57
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!