Recommended Posts

Ok, I'm fixing a pc for a friend. When I turned on the computer I was blocked out by some dumb message about copyrights and wanting to pay $200. Finally was able remove some of the files, delete from start up, etc. installed spy bot search and destroy, ran the scan and removed all entries. Used the pc on and off for a few days. No issues. Gave the pc back... Within 2 days...it's back. Is there a better freeware scanner/remover for this. I'm at my wits end with this.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1120426-need-help-removing-virusmalware/
Share on other sites

1. Boot in safemode

2. Empty ALL temp folders, including user temp folders, not just windows

3. Reset IE, checking the box to delete everything

4. Open regedit:

HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run

and

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run

Delete any suspicious looking entries

Also delete anything in HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software and HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE that look malware related

Open MSCONFIG and disable anything that looks suspicious in there too

----------

Reboot in normal mode, and run a full scan with a fully updated malwarebytes

You have already scanned with spybot but do it again anyway

Another good thing is installing Avast Free, and do a "Boot Time Scan" this will be able to remove malware that can not be killed inside of windows

Download and run a scan with "Hijack This" remove any suspicious entries in there too

Scan a couple of times with all the above programs until they all return a clean result

If you still have a problem after all that, wipe > reinstall windows

  • Like 3

What exactly would be considered suspicious? I'd assume they would label anything that would set off red flags..

Well just anything you don't recognise as being installed on the machine as a genuine app, a lot of malware will have registry keys with weird symbols, such as !"?$%^&*&()_) or the name of the fake AV that pops up

Normally pretty easy to spot, the first 2 keys I mentioned are what windows calls to startup with windows, so if you don't want anything starting up with windows, delete those keys, and in MSCONFIG

Latest version is 2.04....It doesn't work properly with 64bit oses. It also doesn't dig as deep as otl.

Compare a hjt log with a otl log.

sample otl log

http://www.bleepingc...opic313328.html

sample hjt log

http://www.techsuppo...down-14837.html

which do you think is more thorough and can help you better find the cause?

Latest version is 2.04....It doesn't work properly with 64bit oses. It also doesn't dig as deep as otl.

Compare a hjt log with a otl log.

Ok, never used OTL, still HijackThis is a decent app, using both would be better than not using HJT, never had a problem with HJT and 64bit OSs though

read about hjt and 64 bit, while this isn't necessarily a problem people unfamiliar with it will go to disable critical processes and screw their computers up more. I don't recommend running this as a novice, nor do I recommend running it over the internet being that people can be tempted to try to fix it themselves causing more issues. bottom line, it doesn't work well with 64 bit oses and otl produces the similar findings as hjt with many more pieces to the os puzzle (more files, more reg entries, more points of infection, etc). Running otl with a good rootkit detection software, like gmer, will allow you, the tech, to actually find something useful and be able to repair the computer.

http://www.experts-e...it-Systems.html

That being said, it may take a few hours to go through and verify a otl report.

read about hjt and 64 bit

http://www.experts-e...it-Systems.html

Well that doesn't render HJT useless on 64bit systems, we're not looking for missing file entries, we're looking for malware entries, make no difference if HJT can't find 64bit files

And more to the point, I don't know many 64bit versions of malware

Well that doesn't render HJT useless on 64bit systems, we're not looking for missing file entries, we're looking for malware entries, make no difference if HJT can't find 64bit files

And more to the point, I don't know many 64bit versions of malware

not exactly useful either. if it is not useful, it is useless IMO.

you could do what others said and waste your time, or do what will be the easiest. Download a 10 meg file mawarebytes.com from here (filehippo link) on to a usb key. Boot into safe mode, install, run a scan, let it remove it. Done. If you want to do it the hard way, follow the other posts above.

Secret....malware bytes doesn't remove everything. Their root kit detection piece is still in beta last time I checked. Malware bytes is not the end all be all.

I have been around a lot of malware, and I can tell you with 100% certainty that malware bytes doesn't remove all of it. Just a good portion. I run a min of three different removal utilities mwb being one of them when cleaning computers. Mwb isnt the first thing i run, it is the last. I do know its limitations.

Secret....malware bytes doesn't remove everything. Their root kit detection piece is still in beta last time I checked. Malware bytes is not the end all be all.

I have been around a lot of malware, and I can tell you with 100% certainty that malware bytes doesn't remove all of it. Just a good portion. I run a min of three different removal utilities mwb being one of them when cleaning computers. I do know its limitations.

after servicing a couple thousand machines over the last couple years , i have had a 100% success ratio with malwarebytes when scanning in safe mode. Could you give me an example of malware that it can't remove? I would like to download it and see for myself.

note: i LOVE getting new stuff to test virus removal techniques. being serious.

Pick any root kit. The Remote Desktop attack 6months ago it couldn't detect (MSE was the first that did). Had problems finding, file name was close to a windows file name and I kept overlooking it.

I have been doing manual virus removal since late 90s. I have thousands over you. Hell, the hospital I was working at had a whole site infection over 10000 computers and hundreds of servers. Nightmare.

Pick any root kit. The Remote Desktop attack 6months ago it couldn't detect (MSE was the first that did). Had problems finding, file name was close to a windows file name and I kept overlooking it.

I have been doing manual virus removal since late 90s. I have thousands over you. Hell, the hospital I was working at had a whole site infection over 10000 computers and hundreds of servers. Nightmare.

could you give me even just 1 name of a rootkit that you could not remove with it? the worst one in your mind/experiance

you could do what others said and waste your time, or do what will be the easiest. Download a 10 meg file mawarebytes.com from here (filehippo link) on to a usb key. Boot into safe mode, install, run a scan, let it remove it. Done. If you want to do it the hard way, follow the other posts above.

This. Why make the removal process difficult?

could you give me even just 1 name of a rootkit that you could not remove with it? the worst one in your mind/experiance

Is it that hard to google root kit names, like I said pick one any one. Pull any one out of a google search. Malware bytes is 100% ineffective against any root kit. It doesn't have the scan engine for it, therefore it can't detect or repair against this type of infection. Google redirect is one.

Here you go read through and you will see that the user running malware bytes has no effect against it. http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/topic434638.html

Huh? How is it not useful ?

What do you have against HJT ? It works, what more do you want ?

I don't like doing things twice and skimming through information I have been through before.

Is it that hard to google root kit names, like I said pick one any one. Pull any one out of a google search. Malware bytes is 100% ineffective against any root kit. It doesn't have the scan engine for it, therefore it can't detect or repair against this type of infection. Google redirect is one. Here you go read through and you will see that the user running malware bytes has no effect against it. http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/topic434638.html I don't like doing things twice and skimming through information I have been through before.

Ok, well each to their own, lets not hijackthis thread with our differences ;)

Is it that hard to google root kit names, like I said pick one any one. Pull any one out of a google search. Google redirect is one.

Surprised you could not give one from your own extensive experiences and instead saying Google one. I am having no luck finding an .exe for the google redirect to infect myself with. Google is full of solution links and no actual download links (of course and expected). Do you know where i can get the .exe file? Or maybe a website that does give the infection?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'd say the first one failed to be as popular as Apple anticipated, but the easy adjustment here is to make fewer of them next time around. It would only be a "flop" if it isn't possible for Apple to recover the design and factory tooling costs given the number of units sold, which I doubt would be the case. It isn't like no one bought them; it just failed to become the new hot phone of the year.
    • You're right that it does not follow the plain meaning of the word, but in this context, it is a legal term defined in 49 U.S.C. Kind of how "wire fraud" laws apply even if a physical wire was not used. Given that it is codified in law, and it isn't just automotive journalists that don't understand evolving technology, I highly doubt congress would change a well understood term just because technology makes the term slightly less actuate.
    • This is exactly why I keep saying we are not ready for human free self-driving. These little "bugs" are may seem like random one-offs. There was also the Waymo that drove between police with drawn weapons and the suspect they were pointing them at. From a software perspective it is easy to understand how those extremely rare situations may not have been programed for, but that is the point. If AI needs to be told to watch out for every possible contingency, then it can never be successful. There will always be the possibility of a first encounter that the AI needs to understand to avoid.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Final by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 | 14.6MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      586
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      187
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      74
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      72
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!