Malware infection question


Recommended Posts

Usually when I have somebody come up to me with a computer that has Malware on it, I simply re install everything for them. Say what you want abotu it, but it is much faster to re-install than spend potentially days fixing the computer and making sure it is right before they go back to their banking.

So my question is this, I usually do a format, and re-install. Will a Windows 8 Clean Install Upgrade get rid of infections? I only ask because it still does make a Windows.Old folder if I remember. Couldn't the malware be in there when it is all done?

Lastly, has there been any word as to the $40 Windows 8 upgrade and installing it on a fresh drive? When I installed it, I needed Windows 7 fully installed before in order to get 8 to activate.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1120900-malware-infection-question/
Share on other sites

You should be able to format the HDD with the upgrade media, yes. At least I could with mine...

Ah I gotcha. So I think what I am understanding right is that I DO need to have some previous Windows version installed, but when I boot with the Windows 8 media, I can format it there just like Windows 7? That is probably why it did not work for me, nothing was on the drive when I tried.

3 hours, if it takes longer than 3 hours you are doing it wrong or they have a million files or so or a computer built in 1990.

I spend a few hours cleaning it, if it comes back within a week, which rarely does, I wipe and rebuild. You need new techniques.

On to your question, if you don't delete the partition and reformat the infection can still be in the boot sector. In the past, when doing a clean install from a upgrade disk you would just need to put in your old os media (xp, vista, etc).

Ah I gotcha. So I think what I am understanding right is that I DO need to have some previous Windows version installed, but when I boot with the Windows 8 media, I can format it there just like Windows 7? That is probably why it did not work for me, nothing was on the drive when I tried.

I also have 3 HDD's in my machine, which could have triggered the option to pop up. :p

3 hours, if it takes longer than 3 hours you are doing it wrong or they have a million files or so or a computer built in 1990.

I spend a few hours cleaning it, if it comes back within a week, which rarely does, I wipe and rebuild. You need new techniques. If you don't format, the infection can still be in the boot sector.

I seem to notice more and more that people's solution to a computer that doesn't work or is infected seems to be "step 1: format the machine." It's bizarre, for me a format has always been the final option, not the first. I would have lots of unhappy customers if I kept taking their laptop away and wiping it. :laugh:

I seem to notice more and more that people's solution to a computer that doesn't work or is infected seems to be "step 1: format the machine." It's bizarre, for me a format has always been the final option, not the first. I would have lots of unhappy customers if I kept taking their laptop away and wiping it. :laugh:

No one would trust me to do squat and word of mouth would be nil. Have to keep people happy, have to be fast, and have to keep data integrity. They want their computer back in a working state with all of their apps and files in tact.

I seem to notice more and more that people's solution to a computer that doesn't work or is infected seems to be "step 1: format the machine." It's bizarre, for me a format has always been the final option, not the first. I would have lots of unhappy customers if I kept taking their laptop away and wiping it. :laugh:

Format and reinstall is the only way to be 100% sure the malware is gone. I swear by this and its always my first option. Also you will have less repeats when this happens. Customers are alot careful due to the format and reinstall.
Format and reinstall is the only way to be 100% sure the malware is gone. I swear by this and its always my first option. Also you will have less repeats when this happens. Customers are alot careful due to the format and reinstall.

Sorry, I disagree. As sc302 said, all wiping their machine will do is send them to someone else next time who will attempt to preserve their data and settings. If someone on my team suggested formatting a machine as the first step, I'd have them removed from my team.

See we like our customers and like referrals. Referrals is free money. I spent 0 advertising dollars to get them in my door. I formatted once and cost a client and a minimum of 10 of their friends. I explained what was needed and she was not happy then when she picked up her computer she wasn't happy that I didn't have everything back to the way it was when she gave it to me. To get her out the door I had to eat it. Never has it happened again. Most people appreciate the effort and understand that if it needs to come back within a week that they should have a backup performed (I charge extra for the backup) but will wipe and rebuild their computer with any software they provide at no additional cost.

Again, that doesn't happen often. Once last year was the last I can remember.

Sorry, I disagree. As sc302 said, all wiping their machine will do is send them to someone else next time who will attempt to preserve their data and settings. If someone on my team suggested formatting a machine as the first step, I'd have them removed from my team.

I'm with you on this one, I used to just wipe and reinstall, but once I was trained up in a repair shop on how to remove malware thoroughly, formatting is only the very last option if all else fails.

I became pretty good at killing malware that more often than not, once I had done all my manual steps, scanners such as malwarebytes wouldn't find any leftovers for things like Antivirus 2010 fake AVs etc

I'm on both sides of this

1) If I was infected with malware (which I have never been) I would restore from a good image. after the malware was removed I would not use the installation in its current state. I would never again trust it.

2) None of us can be 100% sure we got everything it's impossible. Having said that when i'm done I am pretty confident the infection is gone. Rarely do I reformat and very rarely do I get any systems immediately back.

3) 3 hours can be about right. Hell a full scan with malwarebytes is usually 40 mins. I also do an external scan with kaspersky rescue from outside of windows. That can be another 40 mins or longer. I usually remove all temp and internet temp files (usually with ccleaner) to make the scans go as fast as possible.

4) If I had to format and reinstall I don't see my customers saying bad things about. It's not they would loose all their data.

3) 3 hours can be about right. Hell a full scan with malwarebytes is usually 40 mins. I also do an external scan with kaspersky rescue from outside of windows. That can be another 40 mins or longer. I usually remove all temp and internet temp files to make the scans go as fast as possible.

I always run CCleaner before Malwarebytes, works a treat to get all the junk cleared out before you scan for infection. Those two go together like peanut butter and jelly ;)

I always run CCleaner before Malwarebytes, works a treat to get all the junk cleared out before you scan for infection. Those two go together like peanut butter and jelly ;)

Correct, if you don't remove those internet temp files first 1 scan can EASILY! TAKE 2 hour - 3 hours. Yesterday I removed someones internet temp files, they had over 100,000 Internet temp files.

Correct, if you don't remove those internet temp files first 1 scan can EASILY! TAKE 2 hour - 3 hours. Yesterday I removed someones internet temp files, they had over 100,000 Internet temp files.

I once saw it remove over 15GB of temp files. I was floored...

I once saw it remove over 15GB of temp files. I was floored...

I sometimes use ccleaner, but sometimes I remove the internet temp files by hand and then rerun ccleaner for the rest of the files. ccleaner takes FOREVER to remove what takes far less time doing it by hand. As far as the reinstalls go, before I format I also backup their software registry Hive. I then run that through a product key finder and it extracts a lot of their product keys which allows me to reinstall some of their stuff for them, like office, norton and such.

I'm on both sides of this

1) If I was infected with malware (which I have never been) I would restore from a good image. after the malware was removed I would not use the installation in its current state. I would never again trust it.

2) None of us can be 100% sure we got everything it's impossible. Having said that when i'm done I am pretty confident the infection is gone. Rarely do I reformat and very rarely do I get any systems immediately back.

3) 3 hours can be about right. Hell a full scan with malwarebytes is usually 40 mins. I also do an external scan with kaspersky rescue from outside of windows. That can be another 40 mins or longer. I usually remove all temp and internet temp files (usually with ccleaner) to make the scans go as fast as possible.

4) If I had to format and reinstall I don't see my customers saying bad things about. It's not they would loose all their data.

Just to put something out there.

If you actually know what you are doing, then yes you can be 100% certain it is gone. If you send a customer a machine where you are only pretty certain it is gone, then that's really bad.

That is just inviting all sorts of headaches, especially if you didn't get it and they have their identity stolen.

If you cannot take the time to be certain you have eliminated the threat then send them to someone else or close shop.

Man, I really am getting more like Ramsay as time goes on...

Just to put something out there.

If you actually know what you are doing, then yes you can be 100% certain it is gone. If you send a customer a machine where you are only pretty certain it is gone, then that's really bad.

That is just inviting all sorts of headaches, especially if you didn't get it and they have their identity stolen.

If you cannot take the time to be certain you have eliminated the threat then send them to someone else or close shop.

Man, I really am getting more like Ramsay as time goes on...

If you want to go through every registry key and reverse engineer every file on the hard drive be my guest. What I'm saying is using the tools that I use, they tell me the system is clean. The issue they came in with is no longer there. I inspect the system and known malware locations, and running processes, host files, .... nobody can be 100% sure.

The last scan of many I do, is an external system scan with a kaspersky rescue disc, just to make sure I do the best I can to find infections that are trying to hide from the running OS.

I never had an issue with a customer being mad because of a format and reinstall. I have had issues where one of our other technicians tried to clean a system and return it to a customer only to have them come back again. I would sooner say in the position I am in I would get more angry people with the removal than I would the clean install. If the customer has data they must keep I boot them to something where they can back up the files to an external they provide. Once that is done then I blast away the system. Either way the risk of ID theft and such is too great to let the customer just leave with a simple removal.

If you want to go through every registry key and reverse engineer every file on the hard drive be my guest. What I'm saying is using the tools that I use, they tell me the system is clean. The issue they came in with is no longer there. I inspect the system and known malware locations, and running processes, host files, .... nobody can be 100% sure.

Yes exactly, if I tell my clients that do their banking and sensitive information that I could spend 3 or more hours fixing it, or spend the same amount of time re-installing. Most of them prefer re-installing.

It is much faster for me to install fresh and install their programs, than it is to try to mess with it. This is why I format, not because I am too stupid to clean it. But when people bank and have their tax stuff on there, you better be damn sure they prefer to wipe it.

I have my methods, you have yours. This post was not to get on me for my format choice. In my experience, it is much faster, and after I do a format I make a disk image and give it to them if they need it.

If you want to go through every registry key and reverse engineer every file on the hard drive be my guest. What I'm saying is using the tools that I use, they tell me the system is clean. The issue they came in with is no longer there. I inspect the system and known malware locations, and running processes, host files, .... nobody can be 100% sure.

The last scan of many I do, is an external system scan with a kaspersky rescue disc, just to make sure I do the best I can to find infections that are trying to hide from the running OS.

Doing that is not necessary to ensure the system is clean.

You can be certain and if you're not confident in your work being 100% accurate it has no business going back to a customer.

Going back to the Ramsay point. If you work in a restaurant are going to serve food you think isn't spoiled or food that you know isn't spoiled?

If it is the former the then I don't want you in my kitchen. :p

If you want to go through every registry key and reverse engineer every file on the hard drive be my guest. What I'm saying is using the tools that I use, they tell me the system is clean. The issue they came in with is no longer there. I inspect the system and known malware locations, and running processes, host files, .... no body can be 100% sure.

I so agree...one has to remember also you can not spent many hours or even days on a machine if you are in business , you are paid for volume of machines you put thru and your roi (return on investment) diminishes each hour you work on a machine. For the sake of discussion let's say you charge $200 (or something eqivilent in your currency) to fix it, 4 hours to reload it $50 an hour, 8 hours to find and kill malware $25 an hour and you have worked twice as hard

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      80
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!