Best graphics card for $150-200?


Recommended Posts

Hey everyone, what's the best card I can get for anywhere from $150-200, in light of Black Friday/Cyber Monday?

This will be going in a machine with an i5-3570K, 8 GB of RAM, and a 128 GB Crucial M4. Will be used to play games like Planetside 2, Battlefield 3, Natural Selection 2, CS:GO, and Blacklight Retribution.

I'm located in the US, so preferred stores include Newegg, TigerDirect, Amazon (not as much since I get charged sales tax now :\), and I don't have any problem with mail-in rebates, so technically my budget max is $220 or so

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1121826-best-graphics-card-for-150-200/
Share on other sites

I got that same CPU! It's nice.

and for the GPU I would go with the Nvidia GF 650Ti. I got it for 160 at microcenter. Very nice mid-range card for the money. I can max out skyrim at 1080p pretty easy. The GPU peaked at 35-42C on an outside part. It was around 30-40fps outside and 50 inside.... not too bad. I had most settings on ultra with the AA, etc turned up as well.

Hum you can get a 660 oc or a 7870 in the 150-200$ price range.

http://www.ncix.com/...US&promoid=1030

http://www.ncix.com/...ar&promoid=1030

You have a good machine. If your max budget is 200$ i don't see why you would buy a 7850 or a 650.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 5 weeks later...

Would a 650ti be better than a 560ti? That's the card my brother had, until it broke (physically)

I know the 550ti was severely gimped compared to the 560ti

Where the 550Ti was gimped compared to the 560Ti was in two areas - bandwidth and CUDA core/ROP count. Both are areas where even the "gimped" GTX550Ti trumps the non-Ti GTX650.

Think - the GTX550Ti is a cut-down GTX560Ti; naturally it would be gimped compared to the more-expensive relation. (The same is true comparing the GTX650 to the GTX660 - either non-Ti vs. non-Ti OR Ti vs.Ti.)

By rights the GTX550Ti should be compared to the GTX650 non-Ti - they are priced identically pretty much for the same memory loadouts, and have similar power requirements; however, the Fermi part has higher bandwidth than the Kepler part (192-bit memory bus for Fermi vs. 128-bit for Kepler).

Given identical RAM configurations, bandwidth needs of your games should rightly determine which you should buy (especially since, as I pointed out, GTX550Ti is directly price-comparable to GTX650 non-Ti).

The same is, of course, true on the AMD side of GPU Street (HD7770 vs. HD7850 or even HD7850 vs. HD7870) - in the case of the former, the HD7770 has a bandwidth disadvantage compared to HD7850; however, it makes up for it with both lower power requirements and a lower price - the latter two are identical in terms of bandwidth, but dissimilar in terms of power draw and (again) price; still there is a smaller gap there between HD7850 and HD7870 compared to HD7770 vs. HD7850.

HD7770 competes with both the GTX650 non-Ti and GTX550Ti in terms of price and RAM loadout (except that 2GB loadouts of HD7770 are not common among AMD AIBs, while both GTX550Ti and GTX650 non-Ti have a plethora of 2GB iterations from nVidia AIBs) - If you are looking in that $100USD-$200USD (single GPU) price range and don't have loyalty to a particular GPU AIB or even AMD vs. nVidia in general, it can be rather difficult choosing a card.

Normally, I stick with AMD (and ATI before that) - I have NEVER purchased an nVidia GPU for my own use. However, the higher bandwidth of the GTX550Ti - at either the same price, or even a bit cheaper, compared to the HD7770 - has me rethinking that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • According to Microsoft, Cause: One of the drivers controlling the device notified the operating system that the device failed in some manner.   https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/error-codes-in-device-manager-in-windows-524e9e89-4dee-8883-0afa-6bca0456324e
    • This looks awesome, I will request access via Steam later this afternoon!
    • Personally, I’ve found that it’s usually worth investing in the infrastructure you don’t want to replace later, especially cabling. Running Cat6A (or better, depending on your needs) during an upgrade is relatively inexpensive compared to having to re-cable a few years down the road. For switches I try to balance current specs with realistic growth. If my budget allows it Ill choose switches with higher uplink speeds which leaves room for expanding later on, but I don’t necessarily overspend on access ports if the endpoints won’t benefit from them anytime soon. One lesson I’ve learned is that planning for scalability pays off. It’s much easier to add devices, VLANs, or higher-bandwidth workloads when your network infrastructure already supports it than to replace hardware later.  What is your budget like?
    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!