Updating the kernel


Recommended Posts

I plan on updating my Linux Mint 14 desktop to the latest stable linux 3.6.7 kernel. I was just wondering what the pro's and con's are for this? Im currently running kernel 3.5.0-18.

I figured that there might be performance improvements and bug fixes etc. Will this negatively impact my Mint updates etc?

EDIT: on a side note, when I look at my system information it displays 8 cores, one running at the correct 3.1GHz and the other 7 running at 1.6GHz. Is this normal? In the benchmarking software in system information, it displays my CPU as an Intel Celeron M 1.5GHz running at 3.1GHz lol.

It also displays the correct info in System Details as an Intel Core i7 3770s x 8 @ 3.1GHz

So is the system running at the correct speeds?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1121858-updating-the-kernel/
Share on other sites

It should only affect driver updates, or similar modules that plug directly into the kernel. Userland stuff shouldn't care (unless it needs something in the new kernel, but in that case updating would fix it)

You might always hit new bugs though, I remember the switch from 2.2 to 2.4 caused random apps to crash all the time, but that got fixed through later updates.

I plan on updating my Linux Mint 14 desktop to the latest stable linux 3.6.7 kernel. I was just wondering what the pro's and con's are for this? Im currently running kernel 3.5.0-18.

I figured that there might be performance improvements and bug fixes etc. Will this negatively impact my Mint updates etc?

EDIT: on a side note, when I look at my system information it displays 8 cores, one running at the correct 3.1GHz and the other 7 running at 1.6GHz. Is this normal? In the benchmarking software in system information, it displays my CPU as an Intel Celeron M 1.5GHz running at 3.1GHz lol.

It also displays the correct info in System Details as an Intel Core i7 3770s x 8 @ 3.1GHz

So is the system running at the correct speeds?

The cpu thing sounds like a bug with that benchmarking software, I would not worry.

Ok thanks for the information guys I appreciate it :)

Ill try out some benchmarking software and maybe a VM to see where the CPU speed reporting issue comes from. I am hoping its not an issue with Linux holding back the performance of the CPU.

Just out of curiosity, how are you planning on upgrading the kernel? Does Mint have a repository for the latest stable kernel builds that I don't know about? Are you planning on using the Ubuntu mainline kernel builds or the latest kernel from Debian experimental? Or are you planning on building the latest kernel build yourself?

Just to note, unless Mint provides an official repository for the latest stable kernel, its probably not wise to upgrade unless you have a very specific reason, such as a regression where your e1000e network adapter doesn't connect to your LAN (which has definitely NEVER happened to ME with Ubuntu 9.10!) It can certainly be done, but its not worth it in my experience without a very good reason.

EDIT: on a side note, when I look at my system information it displays 8 cores, one running at the correct 3.1GHz and the other 7 running at 1.6GHz. Is this normal? In the benchmarking software in system information, it displays my CPU as an Intel Celeron M 1.5GHz running at 3.1GHz lol.

It also displays the correct info in System Details as an Intel Core i7 3770s x 8 @ 3.1GHz

So is the system running at the correct speeds?

Like the_decryptor said, this is most likely due to speedstep slowing down the unused cores to save power. It's normal :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Just the price of doing business. The scamble to pull as much from the web as possible is happening, and it's happening before a case like this changes how or what is legal do to with AI in terms of data harvesting. But even then as we've seen with the likes of Google who ignore cookie requests and just accept the fact they'll get fined, it's built into their business price model now. AI is here, its not going away. Their reward if any from the court case would be best suited to trying to incorprate AI or licence their end points as authentic human verified content. The problem is, as we've seen these same news papers are using AI themselves.
    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      137
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!