Why does the "System Reserved" parititon keep removing its own labe


Recommended Posts

so how about a screenshot now showing its current state, then will have as reference when you say it changes.

As you wish :)

This is working (showing the label and hibernate works):

dsfz.png

The "photoshop" version of what happens is usually this (next time it happens Ill show you the official screenshot:

choppedu.png

Found this on hibernation issues- Seems as if in some systems it gets set 75 which is not enough for some systems causing random hibernation issues.

Change the registry setting HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\HiberFileSizePercent to 100.

Rebooted. Now hiberfile size is 100% of RAM size. Hibernation now works.

Here is the picture you asked of when it happens:

..

You don't happen to have any 3rd party boot managers or an antivirus that protects the boot partition, do you?

Also, what type of Windows install is this? OEM, Retail or Volume License?

Found this on hibernation issues- Seems as if in some systems it gets set 75 which is not enough for some systems causing random hibernation issues.

Change the registry setting HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\HiberFileSizePercent to 100.

Rebooted. Now hiberfile size is 100% of RAM size. Hibernation now works.

Done. Ill fix it like always and see if it does any difference...

You don't happen to have any 3rd party boot managers or an antivirus that protects the boot partition, do you?

Also, what type of Windows install is this? OEM, Retail or Volume License?

Nope.

This is VL.

Nope.

This is VL.

Just a longshot, but can I assume you're activated normally and don't have a 3rd party bootloader? Some 3rd party bootloaders tend to overwrite partition tables.

Who says it get removed? Looks to me like the disk just didn't get read correctly - since your file type is gone. If just label was removed you would still see that its a NTFS file system still.

Go to a command line and use disk part to see if you can view it that way. Elevated prompt!

C:\Windows\system32>diskpart

Microsoft DiskPart version 6.1.7601

Copyright ? 1999-2008 Microsoft Corporation.

On computer: I5-W7

DISKPART> sel disk 1

Disk 1 is now the selected disk.

DISKPART> list vol

Volume ### Ltr Label Fs Type Size Status Info

---------- --- ----------- ----- ---------- ------- --------- --------

Volume 0 E DVD-ROM 0 B No Media

Volume 1 I DVD-ROM 0 B No Media

Volume 2 System Rese NTFS Partition 100 MB Healthy System

Volume 3 C OS NTFS Partition 931 GB Healthy Boot

Volume 4 D stuff NTFS Partition 232 GB Healthy

Volume 5 Removable 0 B No Media

Volume 6 Removable 0 B No Media

Volume 7 Removable 0 B No Media

Volume 8 Removable 0 B No Media

DISKPART>

Who says it get removed? Looks to me like the disk just didn't get read correctly - since your file type is gone. If just label was removed you would still see that its a NTFS file system still.

Go to a command line and use disk part to see if you can view it that way. Elevated prompt!

C:\Windows\system32>diskpart

Microsoft DiskPart version 6.1.7601

Copyright ? 1999-2008 Microsoft Corporation.

On computer: I5-W7

DISKPART> sel disk 1

Disk 1 is now the selected disk.

DISKPART> list vol

Volume ### Ltr Label Fs Type Size Status Info

---------- --- ----------- ----- ---------- ------- --------- --------

Volume 0 E DVD-ROM 0 B No Media

Volume 1 I DVD-ROM 0 B No Media

Volume 2 System Rese NTFS Partition 100 MB Healthy System

Volume 3 C OS NTFS Partition 931 GB Healthy Boot

Volume 4 D stuff NTFS Partition 232 GB Healthy

Volume 5 Removable 0 B No Media

Volume 6 Removable 0 B No Media

Volume 7 Removable 0 B No Media

Volume 8 Removable 0 B No Media

DISKPART>

Right now it is working (I added and removed the drive letter as always to fix it)

Here it is currently fixed:

Microsoft DiskPart version 6.1.7601

Copyright © 1999-2008 Microsoft Corporation.

On computer: SUM

DISKPART> sel disk 1

Disk 1 is now the selected disk.

DISKPART> list vol

Volume ### Ltr Label Fs Type Size Status Info

---------- --- ----------- ----- ---------- ------- --------- --------

Volume 0 E DVD-ROM 0 B No Media

Volume 1 F DVD-ROM 0 B No Media

Volume 2 System Rese NTFS Partition 100 MB Healthy System

Volume 3 C NTFS Partition 465 GB Healthy Boot

Volume 4 D NTFS Partition 8 TB Healthy

Volume 5 G Removable 0 B No Media

DISKPART>

Ill post it again when it breaks again...

  • 2 weeks later...

Here it is again broke:

Microsoft DiskPart version 6.1.7601

Copyright © 1999-2008 Microsoft Corporation.

On computer: SUM

DISKPART> sel disk 1

Disk 1 is now the selected disk.

DISKPART> list vol

Volume ### Ltr Label Fs Type Size Status Info

---------- --- ----------- ----- ---------- ------- --------- --------

Volume 0 E DVD-ROM 0 B No Media

Volume 1 F DVD-ROM 0 B No Media

Volume 2 Partition 100 MB Healthy Offline

Volume 3 C NTFS Partition 465 GB Healthy Boot

Volume 4 D NTFS Partition 8 TB Healthy

Volume 5 G Removable 0 B No Media

DISKPART>

Shows offline for whatever reason - so yeah its not going to show you label or type. So there is NOTHING in your event log on why the volume was set offline?? I find that almost impossible to believe.

what do you get if you just set it back online

sel vol 2

online volume

Shows offline for whatever reason - so yeah its not going to show you label or type. So there is NOTHING in your event log on why the volume was set offline?? I find that almost impossible to believe.

What and where do I look in my Event Log? Anything specific?

What and where do I look in my Event Log? Anything specific?

generally what I do is let it load up-- then sort by type-- look for anything red -

When you sort by type depending on the sort they will either be at the top or bottom of the list.

I would start there... usually those will tell you if there are serious issues.

Found something! :) Finally. I just don't know how the **** this arrived like this. And how the **** do I remove it?

Encrypted volume check: Volume information on \\?\Volume{b692cea4-1ccd-11e2-80c8-806e6f6e6963} cannot be read.

Source: BitLocker-Driver

User: SYSTEM

The thing is I have never used Bitshit in my life. How the **** do I nuke this piece of ****?

And now even stranger: I used to be able to assign it a letter (therefore recovering the label), deassign it the letter and then hibernate. Now I do the same process but when I hibernate it, the display goes black but the PC keeps running and it never hibernates.

I don't think that error is related to drive being encrypted or using bitlocker, just think that is a generic type error that that volume can not be read in general. While your bitlocker driver checked to see if it was encrypted.

Seems you have issues with that disk if you ask me... You ran checkdisk against that specific partition?

Does that guid for that volume match up with your system reserved partition? A quick way to list all volumes by guid is mountvol

example

C:\>mountvol
Creates, deletes, or lists a volume mount point.

MOUNTVOL [drive:]path VolumeName
MOUNTVOL [drive:]path /D
MOUNTVOL [drive:]path /L
MOUNTVOL [drive:]path /P
MOUNTVOL /R
MOUNTVOL /N
MOUNTVOL /E

	path		Specifies the existing NTFS directory where the mount
				point will reside.
	VolumeName  Specifies the volume name that is the target of the mount
				point.
	/D		  Removes the volume mount point from the specified directory.
	/L		  Lists the mounted volume name for the specified directory.
	/P		  Removes the volume mount point from the specified directory,
				dismounts the volume, and makes the volume not mountable.
				You can make the volume mountable again by creating a volume
				mount point.
	/R		  Removes volume mount point directories and registry settings
				for volumes that are no longer in the system.
	/N		  Disables automatic mounting of new volumes.
	/E		  Re-enables automatic mounting of new volumes.

Possible values for VolumeName along with current mount points are:

	\\?\Volume{2964090a-db60-11e0-ba2f-806e6f6e6963}\
		*** NO MOUNT POINTS ***

	\\?\Volume{594c943c-dbb1-11e0-a78d-180373b10dd3}\
		D:\

	\\?\Volume{2964090b-db60-11e0-ba2f-806e6f6e6963}\
		C:\

	\\?\Volume{2964091f-db60-11e0-ba2f-806e6f6e6963}\
		*** NO MOUNT POINTS ***

	\\?\Volume{29640920-db60-11e0-ba2f-806e6f6e6963}\
		*** NO MOUNT POINTS ***

	\\?\Volume{29640921-db60-11e0-ba2f-806e6f6e6963}\
		*** NO MOUNT POINTS ***

	\\?\Volume{29640922-db60-11e0-ba2f-806e6f6e6963}\
		*** NO MOUNT POINTS ***

	\\?\Volume{6cc911ca-db53-11e0-80fa-806e6f6e6963}\
		E:\

	\\?\Volume{6cc91246-db53-11e0-80fa-180373b10dd3}\
		I:\

Now that first one is my reserved volume - and I can real simple verify that with just opening it

post-14624-0-79922100-1356360838.png

If while system reserved partition is listed, not a drive letter can you open it with that volume guid listed? If not it might be some other mount point that is no longer even connected to your drive and could be a red herring in your quest for the cause of the problem.

I would run a chkdsk against that system reserved partition. This thread has been going on for a while - you did run a FULL drive test with the tools from your drive maker??

I don't believe you can run a check disk with say

C:\>chkdsk \\?\Volume{2964090a-db60-11e0-ba2f-806e6f6e6963}\

The specified volume name does not have a mount point or drive letter.

So give it a drive letter and then run chkdsk against that drive letter.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!