What Is Your MAIN Backup? Cloud, DVD or HDD?


Backup Solutions  

97 members have voted

  1. 1. What Do You Use as Your Main Backup Device?

    • Cloud (SkyDrive, Google etc)
      21
    • Hard Drive / NAS
      67
    • DVD/Bluray (or other similar type of media)
      5
    • Something else not listed (what?)
      4


Recommended Posts

HDD on my server which is mirrored on to the amazing CrashPlan service. Unlimited space plus unlimited versioning so files will never get deleted, even if I delete them - they will always be recoverable.

It's all about reducing the chances of data loss. Chances of HDD failing + CrashPlan failing together are very slim - there is a chance, but very slim.

I may plan to backup to another HDD soon as a just in case.

I know it's naughty, but I only back up my data to one main HD... Though in all fairness, that hard drive changes every couple of years, so it's not like I'm trusting a 10 year old hard drive to keep my precious data safe.... Right now I'm using a 2TB connected to my desktop (which I set up basically as just an interface to transfer files back and forth between computers.... True NAS is a bit more expensive)

My data fits on a 1.5TB drive, and my VMs fit on a 2TB drive.

I have a pair of each, which are used for weekly backups (using robocopy). Then at the end of each month, I bring the drives to the office and swap them for the pair I left there the month before.

Files on my workstation (Photos, documents, etc) are backed up daily to the Raid-5 array on my server, and whatever is on my server (add movies, music and VMs into the mix) is backed up weekly on my Qnap TS459 Pro2 NAS, which also has a Raid-5 array.

So yeah, it would take quite a lot for me to loose anything

Files on my workstation (Photos, documents, etc) are backed up daily to the Raid-5 array on my server, and whatever is on my server (add movies, music and VMs into the mix) is backed up weekly on my Qnap TS459 Pro2 NAS, which also has a Raid-5 array.

So yeah, it would take quite a lot for me to loose anything

Not really, unless you use good filesystems.

What do you use?

Glassed Silver:mac

Not really, unless you use good filesystems.

What do you use?

Glassed Silver:mac

NTFS Everywhere, however the underlying FS for the NAS iSCSI volume is ext4.

Hardware wise, I'm pretty failure-proof

Edit, did I mention I also snapshot my server and workstation system volumes? :D

Considering that SATA 3TB HDD prices nowadays are acceptable, i don't see any advantage storing your data on cloud where data security question still is controversial. Therefore, my vote for using external or internal SATA HDD for your backups.

Considering that SATA 3TB HDD prices nowadays are acceptable, i don't see any advantage storing your data on cloud where data security question still is controversial. Therefore, my vote for using external or internal SATA HDD for your backups.

House fire/theft?

I use a Synology 212+ NAS. It has a Time Machine server built-in for my Macs. My PCs back up to the NAS also, using Genie Timeline backup software. The NAS also has it's own Cloud service built-in, which has replaced Dropbox for me. No more of my personal data sent out to the web where it can possibly get lost/stolen/compromised. Finally, the entire NAS is backed up nightly to an external HD connected to it.

Tim

House fire/theft?

Still better than give your data to some company which will store them in random country, besides you don't know who can access your data. Yes, you can use something like truecrypt or similar, but anyway i'm not sure that this is worth the bother. Though, i was more speaking about "ordinary home joe" HDD data backup, which main content are some family movies, pictures, some p0rn and game saves, maybe some work docs which copies, anyways scattered around the internet and devices like e-mail, work computer etc.

I need something new. My HP MediaSmart Server, which I had upgraded to WHS2011 kept crapping out on me so I took it offline. I am thinking about a Windows 2012 Server Essentials box to replace it, but I think I'd rather just do cloud backups. I tried carbonite but... meh. I wish SkyDrive would add a backup solution like that though. Would sign up for that in a second!

I use SpiderOak as my online backup, which also syncs my documents to my laptop and my Linux install. I also have an external HDD that I back up. I currently have 4 copies of all my important data, plus online access if I need it :).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!