Connect to a wireless network without ssd broadcasting enabled


Recommended Posts

On my home network I would like to disable ssd broadcasting, but whenever I do so, the two laptops are unable to connect. Is there a method to allow the laptops to connect without having the SSD broadcasting at all times?

On my home network I would like to disable ssd broadcasting, but whenever I do so, the two laptops are unable to connect. Is there a method to allow the laptops to connect without having the SSD broadcasting at all times?

Yep absolutely, it varies from OS to OS, but it is usually as easy as choosing "Other Network" and just manually entering the SSID and Password if needed.

I do also know there are a few cases when you need to change some more advanced settings, like what type of security is being used, but I think that may only be on XP & Vista.

+1@DirtyLarry. As long as you know the "network name", and you have the credentials to connect to said network, you can disable broadcasting adding a very small layer of protection, IE, you can prevent your neighbors from connecting to your wifi by disabling broadcasting. Would this stop a tech-savvy person? Obviously no, but most people don't even know about stuff like that to begin with. My neighbor didn't know until the other day that I have a quite vast wifi signal...it'll reach the end of my block, but I've never had one person try to connect to it. Am I 100% safe? No, but it keeps the old farts off of my connection, kids as well.

Is there a reason you don't want to show the SSID to clients? You're still broadcasting it either way.

this... some management software will even show hidden SSIDs.

I know that on my mom's laptop the management software showed some hidden ones...

so hiding them has no real security... not unless you are using something naughty and don't want your highly religious conservative neighbor to know about kinkyxxxtrannylovex network!!!!!

Yeah there is NO reason that anyone should ever do this! EVER!!! It does not add any extra security, it makes it harder to connect to your own network. As mentioned it actually can cause your network name to be even more broadcasted, because every single client is going to be broadcasting, etc.

The extra broadcasts of the clients looking for it - can actually lower your bandwidth and performance.

There is NOT one reason you should ever think of doing such a thing - ever!! Over the years we have gone over this and over this and over this, come on you have never seen any of the must be 10+ threads somewhat recent even that this has come up and clearly pointed out that its STUPID!!!

here is good write up from 2007 about this nonsense

http://blogs.technet...less-ssids.aspx

Here is a must read about it from back in 2003, like 10 years ago and still this nonsense comes up.. When will it die???

http://www.library.c...ssid_hiding.pdf

--

Contrary to a common belief that the SSID is a WLAN security feature and its exposure a security risk, the

SSID is nothing more than a wireless-space group label. It cannot be successfully hidden. Attempts to

hide it will not only fail, but will negatively impact WLAN performance, and may result in additional

exposure of the SSID to passive scanning. The performance impact of this misguided effort will be felt in

multiple WLAN scenarios, including simple operations like joining a WLAN, and in significantly longer

roaming times.

Robert Moskowitz

Senior Technical Director

ICSA Labs, a division of TruSecure Corp

Author Biography

Robert Moskowitz has been a member of the Internet Architecture Board, the IETF Application Area

Directorate, and co-chair of the IETF IPSec Workgroup. In these areas, he was been heavily involved in

security work. He is now active in IEEE 802 working on security solutions for 802.11 and all the other 802

Medias (Ethernet, wireless broadband, UWB, etc.).

---

But I would love to know what you would accomplish by not broadcasting your SSID - other than causing yourself pain and aggravation with only detrimental effects as the only possible outcome from your efforts.

Funny worded post if that was what your after.. Best advice when it comes to not broadcasting your ssid, forget about it.

As mentioned, depending on your OS there should be a way to allow them to connect to a nonbroadcasting ssid.

Windows can do it, apple can do it, and I am sure ubuntu can as well....manually setup your wireless network and plug the information in.

If you don't know what it is, sniff the air and you will eventually find out what it is. airsnort will get this info. As budman stated so gracefully, you will break things if you hide your wireless...which is what you are seeing.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I hope this encodes in to AV1 or AV2 as currently tiktok uses h265 and h264.
    • Qualcomm reportedly in talks to build custom video chips for TikTok parent ByteDance by Karthik Mudaliar Qualcomm is reportedly in advanced discussions to provide custom chip-design services to Chinese tech giant ByteDance, the same company behind TikTok. According to a report from Reuters, Qualcomm could be involved in designing custom silicon tailored for ByteDance's massive data-center workloads. If it goes through, the deal would make ByteDance one of Qualcomm's early anchor customers for its fastly growing custom chip-design division, For years, Qualcomm was the king of making smartphone processors and modems. The company has also been moving into the PC ecosystem and other formats such as on-device AI for Android XR headsets. However, this particular deal is about Qualcomm's custom Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). For a platform like TikTok, ByteDance needs hardware that can help it ingest, process, and serve billions of short-form videos daily. Generalised hardware is no longer the most cost-effective and efficient route, which is why ByteDance is trying to develop custom Video Processing Units (VPUs). VPUs designed specifically for ByteDance’s algorithmic needs could drastically reduce data-center power consumption and improve encoding speeds at an unprecedented scale. The underlying tech behind these processors is actually from Qualcomm's recent acquisition of AlphaWave Semi, a high-speed connectivity specialist company. By combining AlphaWave’s high-bandwidth IP with Qualcomm’s architectural expertise, the company could begin mass production by the end of 2026, if the talks go through. All this also comes at a time when U.S.-China tech relations have dwindled. Escalating trade frictions between Washington and Beijing have severely impacted the export of high-end AI chips from U.S. firms like Nvidia, AMD, and Lam Research. Yet, the Qualcomm-ByteDance discussions show that U.S. tech companies are still actively seeking growth avenues and are open to doing business with China, where regulators still permit. Reuters notes that the outcome of this deal could be uncertain, and ByteDance might also seek partners other than Qualcomm. via Reuters | Image via DepositPhotos.com
    • Look who's back!
    • I wonder how driving laws around the world will change. No way to really tell if people are using phone. Same with smart watches i guess even now and those silly built in tablets for controlling the car instead of buttons.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      111
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!