Connect to a wireless network without ssd broadcasting enabled


Recommended Posts

On my home network I would like to disable ssd broadcasting, but whenever I do so, the two laptops are unable to connect. Is there a method to allow the laptops to connect without having the SSD broadcasting at all times?

On my home network I would like to disable ssd broadcasting, but whenever I do so, the two laptops are unable to connect. Is there a method to allow the laptops to connect without having the SSD broadcasting at all times?

Yep absolutely, it varies from OS to OS, but it is usually as easy as choosing "Other Network" and just manually entering the SSID and Password if needed.

I do also know there are a few cases when you need to change some more advanced settings, like what type of security is being used, but I think that may only be on XP & Vista.

+1@DirtyLarry. As long as you know the "network name", and you have the credentials to connect to said network, you can disable broadcasting adding a very small layer of protection, IE, you can prevent your neighbors from connecting to your wifi by disabling broadcasting. Would this stop a tech-savvy person? Obviously no, but most people don't even know about stuff like that to begin with. My neighbor didn't know until the other day that I have a quite vast wifi signal...it'll reach the end of my block, but I've never had one person try to connect to it. Am I 100% safe? No, but it keeps the old farts off of my connection, kids as well.

Is there a reason you don't want to show the SSID to clients? You're still broadcasting it either way.

this... some management software will even show hidden SSIDs.

I know that on my mom's laptop the management software showed some hidden ones...

so hiding them has no real security... not unless you are using something naughty and don't want your highly religious conservative neighbor to know about kinkyxxxtrannylovex network!!!!!

Yeah there is NO reason that anyone should ever do this! EVER!!! It does not add any extra security, it makes it harder to connect to your own network. As mentioned it actually can cause your network name to be even more broadcasted, because every single client is going to be broadcasting, etc.

The extra broadcasts of the clients looking for it - can actually lower your bandwidth and performance.

There is NOT one reason you should ever think of doing such a thing - ever!! Over the years we have gone over this and over this and over this, come on you have never seen any of the must be 10+ threads somewhat recent even that this has come up and clearly pointed out that its STUPID!!!

here is good write up from 2007 about this nonsense

http://blogs.technet...less-ssids.aspx

Here is a must read about it from back in 2003, like 10 years ago and still this nonsense comes up.. When will it die???

http://www.library.c...ssid_hiding.pdf

--

Contrary to a common belief that the SSID is a WLAN security feature and its exposure a security risk, the

SSID is nothing more than a wireless-space group label. It cannot be successfully hidden. Attempts to

hide it will not only fail, but will negatively impact WLAN performance, and may result in additional

exposure of the SSID to passive scanning. The performance impact of this misguided effort will be felt in

multiple WLAN scenarios, including simple operations like joining a WLAN, and in significantly longer

roaming times.

Robert Moskowitz

Senior Technical Director

ICSA Labs, a division of TruSecure Corp

Author Biography

Robert Moskowitz has been a member of the Internet Architecture Board, the IETF Application Area

Directorate, and co-chair of the IETF IPSec Workgroup. In these areas, he was been heavily involved in

security work. He is now active in IEEE 802 working on security solutions for 802.11 and all the other 802

Medias (Ethernet, wireless broadband, UWB, etc.).

---

But I would love to know what you would accomplish by not broadcasting your SSID - other than causing yourself pain and aggravation with only detrimental effects as the only possible outcome from your efforts.

Funny worded post if that was what your after.. Best advice when it comes to not broadcasting your ssid, forget about it.

As mentioned, depending on your OS there should be a way to allow them to connect to a nonbroadcasting ssid.

Windows can do it, apple can do it, and I am sure ubuntu can as well....manually setup your wireless network and plug the information in.

If you don't know what it is, sniff the air and you will eventually find out what it is. airsnort will get this info. As budman stated so gracefully, you will break things if you hide your wireless...which is what you are seeing.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • As someone who isn't in the EU what is all this gatekeeper stuff about anyways?
    • The data center gold rush has tossed all forms of sensibility and reasoning right out of the window. The craziest part being that AI infrastructure isn't driven by consumer demand. It's being driven by manufacturers to force AI onto the market, consumers be damned.
    • Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary ..... LOL.... These are the new prices peeps, because they will still sell them. Everybody will get used to the price hike = more Profit!
    • EU says AWS and Microsoft Azure should be treated as DMA gatekeepers by Pradeep Viswanathan Under the European Commission's Digital Markets Act (DMA), a company is presumed to be a gatekeeper if it meets certain quantitative thresholds. However, the Commission can still investigate and designate a company even if it does not meet the numeric thresholds, provided the service has a major market impact. The European Commission launched its investigations into AWS and Azure on November 18, 2025, to address unfair or anti-competitive practices in the cloud sector. Today, the European Commission has informed Amazon and Microsoft of its preliminary view that their cloud computing services, AWS and Azure, should be designated as gatekeepers under the DMA. The EC highlighted that Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft Azure are the largest and second-largest cloud computing services in the European Union. Both of these platforms act as important gateways between businesses and their customers in the EU. The EC further mentioned that AWS and Azure have reached significant turnover, built large and entrenched user bases, and benefit from high switching costs and customer lock-in. Furthermore, their operational capacity and investments appear to have outpaced those of competitors. Teresa Ribera, Executive Vice-President for Clean, Just and Competitive Transition, said the following: It is important to note that the findings are preliminary and do not decide the final outcome. Amazon and Microsoft can now review the findings and respond to the Commission. However, if the Commission confirms its preliminary findings, it will formally designate Amazon and Microsoft as gatekeepers for AWS and Azure. Once designated, Microsoft and Amazon will have six months to bring their cloud services into full compliance with the DMA’s rules and regulations.
    • will EU users be getting the extra 1yr update for free again?
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      436
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      168
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      133
    4. 4
      Xenon
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!