Alex Smith or Colin Kaepernick


Alex Smith or Colin Kaepernick?  

12 members have voted

  1. 1. Who should start for the San Francisco 49ers?

    • Alex Smith
    • Colin Kaepernick


Recommended Posts

So I'm curious where everyone else stands on this. Personally, I've never liked Smith. He's a good game manager, but I've always felt his arm lacking, and he plays it a bit safer than what I enjoy to watch. So who do you think should start? Alex Smith or Colin Kaepernick?

Oops wanted to add this link.

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-am/0ap2000000105224/Should-49ers-go-back-to-Alex-Smith

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1123818-alex-smith-or-colin-kaepernick/
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter which one is on the field this Sunday. Cameron Wake is going to put whoever is under center on their backs. :D

154878952.0_standard_352.0.jpg

In seriousness. I would say Colin Kaepernick. The team has gotten where they are from good coaching, not Alex Smith, who has been horribly inconsistent over the years.

Go 'Phins!

Voted for Alex Smith, but there's a "but". It doesn't really matter one way or the other; they've both clearly got the capacity for being very good. Alex Smith is closer to it, and he's just started to come good on that in the last 2 seasons, and Kaep is showing the potential to do the same but isn't there yet.

The only mistake they could make is mixing and matching, I think they're far better off being decisive and committing to one QB for the season, whoever it is. I do feel kind of sorry for Alex Smith about the circumstances of how he's been benched, especially with how his last ~20 games have been. Hard to take.

Alex Smith has proved to be very good the last couple of years, but Kaepernick injects a vitality that Smith just does not have.

I would like to see Smith thrive in a good team. Maybe Vikings? A fourth pick (Plus Ponder as Kaep's backup) for Smith sounds reasonable.

  • 2 weeks later...

This is a completely different argument to Sanchez vs Tebow because neither of the 49ers QB's are bad. Alex Smith's QB rating is still really high and although people will argue that it's because he hasn't had as many opportunities to throw interceptions this season, he's still a solid QB. As people have already mentioned, the only reason that people are even asking who should start is because Kaepernick is proving himself to be the best of the rookie QB's. It's a tough one, but I think until Kaepernick has a bad game he should be starting.

This is a completely different argument to Sanchez vs Tebow because neither of the 49ers QB's are bad. Alex Smith's QB rating is still really high and although people will argue that it's because he hasn't had as many opportunities to throw interceptions this season, he's still a solid QB. As people have already mentioned, the only reason that people are even asking who should start is because Kaepernick is proving himself to be the best of the rookie QB's. It's a tough one, but I think until Kaepernick has a bad game he should be starting.

Kaepernick is not a rookie QB. He is in his 2nd year this year.

Kaepernick seems to always make the play he needs to make when it matters... Like he did against my Dolphin's last week. :(

At least Cam Wake put him on his back a couple times. 3 sacks if I recall. I called that one. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!