Email not getting through.


Recommended Posts

We have a issue at work and cant work it out, we have one group of people, anyone using a email client program like MICROSOFT OUTLOOK, with one ISP Xtra, anyone using these two things together, and trying to email us at work cannot send, and are they getting a "Email address doesnt exist". email header below. the MX record is incorrect and we have had it updated, but i looks like the ISP xtra are still using a old one (and we dont know where this came from).

Any tip or thoughts on what we should be looking at would be great.

From: Mail Administrator

Date: 6 December 2012 3:09:58 PM NZDT

To:

Subject: Mail System Error - Returned Mail

Reply-To: <Postmaster@>

x-apparently-to: @xtra.co.nz via 124.108.96.84; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 18:09:58 -0800

received-spf: none (domain of mta02.xtra.co.nz does not designate permitted sender hosts)

x-ymailisg: NDvE6hwWLDtmS6aH.dKaAgr_gD8LU76HakISh2FrkeGhBg2Y Pfrc1msCn0YLkF0SrvgjkroXvHpq5Vo1NbL8GmYNsmJp29JFe1nIK8DuxtBZ P2gZY87WIheF3FhUfL879a4Um7FNSfSmptA6.kkqXzVfnDGLEylOycY0UzZN U0cViDDU8g_HDIlecTTB65pbmI7IN.tNoTOKnUhy0PTwt.e8eintKP6ceJPZ S8MqIwhEifEtyPXbMHL89xm02_ALiCsWfYy7MUXdcfCE21fVtciknUhWkt_K MvWi8gy5MwwXEsybiZQVPX8T1A8TBGxOxeUNGjvvWOrKqjHm.YSBhx3uuiLp sjQaLyyZjwjIAEZl7SeGdk2OYiQHWEDX

x-originating-ip: [210.54.141.250]

authentication-results: mta1008.tnz.mail.aue.yahoo.com from=ero.govt.nz; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=ero.govt.nz; dkim=neutral (no sig)

received: from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO mta02.xtra.co.nz) (210.54.141.250) by mta1008.tnz.mail.aue.yahoo.com with SMTP; Wed, 05 Dec 2012 18:09:58 -0800

message-id: <20121206020958.FONK6031.mta02.xtra.co.nz@mta02>

mime-version: 1.0

content-type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; Boundary="===========================_ _= 6259460(6031)1354759798"

This is a system generated message. Please DO NOT REPLY.

Your message was not delivered for the following reason:

The following destination addresses were unknown (please check the

addresses and re-mail the message):

<****@*******>

Kind regards.

The Xtra Messaging Team

Reporting-MTA: dns; sf1431.xtra.co.nz

Arrival-Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 15:09:58 +1300

Received-From-MTA: dns; [125.236.222.142]

Final-Recipient: RFC822; <****@******>

Action: failed

Status: 5.1.1

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1124144-email-not-getting-through/
Share on other sites

Well I am guessing that you blanked out the most important information regarding the error....

The following destination addresses were unknown (please check the

addresses and re-mail the message):

Take a look at the To: line in the header and see where it is going to. Make sure it is the correct address as well as having correct spelling. I have seen issues where the cached address in outlook is corrupt or is going to the wrong place and either the entire cache or the individual email in the cache has to be deleted. If you didn't blank it out, well the email client can't send to <blank>

Well I am guessing that you blanked out the most important information regarding the error....

The following destination addresses were unknown (please check the

addresses and re-mail the message):

Take a look at the To: line in the header and see where it is going to. Make sure it is the correct address as well as having correct spelling. I have seen issues where the cached address in outlook is corrupt or is going to the wrong place and either the entire cache or the individual email in the cache has to be deleted. If you didn't blank it out, well the email client can't send to <blank>

yes i did blank it out, the email address are correct, we have tested deleted the cache email address and the problem still there, and it is also happening to people that have never email us before.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      213
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!