• 0

a little help of choosing a programming lang


Question

so I'm currently stuck for enrolling classes for school

because of the sched conflict, I either have to choose internet programming classes or for .net classes (I'm looking for a year and a half plan. for the first semester, I will take internet programming class. for the second semester though, I'm wondering whether I should take the next lv of internet programming class or for the first .net class. if I take the first .net class, then for my third semester, I will be able to take the next lv of .net class, but then I won't be able to take the second lv of internet programming class forever).

I know that the trend of IT, and the programming languages change fast.

what do I want to be? I can either be a web developer/.net developer, mobile/tablet, etc

but in long term i am willing to shift to the business field

so as I've said, for the first internet programming class, I will be able to learn a bit of html, mysql, php, css, a bit of javascript, and xml

for the second lv of internet programming class, you get to learn jsp, jdbc, ejb jndi, xml, jsp, and more advanced stuffs

for first .net class (i have to take this first in order to be enrolled for the next lv, which is .net enterprise class) - you get to learn c#, .net framework

for the second lv .net class - you get to learn asp.net, ado.net entity framework for web app, deployment database access, and etc.

to some extent, I would like to expand my skills in database, if I could either mssql or mysql

in terms of job market/demand (for now and for the next 3-5 years maybe?), which is more demand?? what do you reckon?? I know I'm the one who decides at the end, but I still wanted to take your advice I would really appreciate if you could give, advice me specifically.

14 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

.Net is specific to Microsoft. Typically I hate learning vendor specific languages and as a beginner, I'd say learning industry standard languages is much more useful. In this case though, I'd recommend taking the first 2 .net classes and here's why...

Once you become good at an object oriented language like java, C++ or C#, it's very easy to pick up any other OO language. You're going to find a 100 different programming and scripting languages that you can use for any given task. The main difference is the syntax and that's easy to learn. The benefit of becoming an expert in one language (or set of related languages) is that you'll learn the difficult things like search algorithms, security, performance optimization, etc. It's very easy to pick up new languages, like java for example, once you've mastered C#.

From your description, it sounds like the internet programming classes are trying to tackle way too much stuff at once. HTML, PHP, CSS etc are things you can learn quickly on your own. Having a class that introduces you to the 1000 different internet technologies out there is a waste of time. You need to hone your object oriented programming skills. After that, you can quickly pick up these other things.

  • Like 2
  • 0

You will need to learn languages on your own anyway. I definitely agree with psyko_x that the best thing to do is master C++, C#, or Java first. Once you have a firm grasp on one of those languages, it will be much easier to learn virtually any other OO language, including ones you would be taught in your web programming classes, like PHP and Javascript.

Also, you might be interested in Coder Radio. They have answered questions very similar to yours in the past. Take it from someone with experience.

  • 0

Go for C# it'll make you a much more versatile programmer. Knowing a typical C-based OO language is a huge asset and will open many doors to you. University is not the time to specialize in one field it's the time to learn as many different things as possible. Open your horizons now and you'll be able to make better career choices.

.Net is specific to Microsoft. Typically I hate learning vendor specific languages and as a beginner, I'd say learning industry standard languages is much more useful.

Oh please. C# is an ECMA standard as with most of the .NET framework. Currently you can learn C#, the .NET framework, and most of the dozens of languages that run on this platform (most of which are open-source) without using any software or platform from Microsoft. While you're at it, why not mention Java was designed by Sun and C by AT&T, and if anything ever was vendor-specific it's been C++ compilers and "standard" libraries.

What definitely doesn't matter for a beginner is who makes the language, how it gets standardized, or even who uses it - heck Scheme is a fine choice for learning even if it doesn't see much use in the industry.

  • Like 2
  • 0

Once you become good at an object oriented language like java, C++ or C#, it's very easy to pick up any other OO language. You're going to find a 100 different programming and scripting languages that you can use for any given task. The main difference is the syntax and that's easy to learn. The benefit of becoming an expert in one language (or set of related languages) is that you'll learn the difficult things like search algorithms, security, performance optimization, etc. It's very easy to pick up new languages, like java for example, once you've mastered C#.

kinda true. I learned C# and now i'm in the process of learning c++ and c++ feels like i'm going backwards. I should have learned c++ first

  • 0

Go for C# it'll make you a much more versatile programmer. Knowing a typical C-based OO language is a huge asset and will open many doors to you. University is not the time to specialize in one field it's the time to learn as many different things as possible. Open your horizons now and you'll be able to make better career choices.

Oh please. C# is an ECMA standard as with most of the .NET framework. Currently you can learn C#, the .NET framework, and most of the dozens of languages that run on this platform (most of which are open-source) without using any software or platform from Microsoft. While you're at it, why not mention Java was designed by Sun and C by AT&T, and if anything ever was vendor-specific it's been C++ compilers and "standard" libraries.

What definitely doesn't matter for a beginner is who makes the language, how it gets standardized, or even who uses it - heck Scheme is a fine choice for learning even if it doesn't see much use in the industry.

If you can develop and run .net applications on linux and mac OS, so be it. I've never written a C# program and didn't realize you could do that. I do find it interesting that you used the word "most" 3 times, but whatever.

As for recommending a language like Scheme to a new programmer, I think that's pretty absurd. There's a huge benefit to starting with a much more widely used language. It's easier to find tutorials on the internet, in books, on forums etc.

  • 0
As for recommending a language like Scheme to a new programmer, I think that's pretty absurd. There's a huge benefit to starting with a much more widely used language. It's easier to find tutorials on the internet, in books, on forums etc.
Yet Scheme is widely used in the academic world because it's a very small and consistent language that's ideal for teaching functional concepts. It's popular enough that there are several Scheme questions every day on stackoverflow.com and several tutorials and books to be found.
  • 0

Yet Scheme is widely used in the academic world because it's a very small and consistent language that's ideal for teaching functional concepts. It's popular enough that there are several Scheme questions every day on stackoverflow.com and several tutorials and books to be found.

Everything's relative. Whatever number of Scheme questions are on stackoverflow each day, you can multiply that by a few orders of magnitude for java etc. It will be more than the "several" questions you see about Scheme

  • 0

thank you all!!

i think i now understand the "flow"

i have one more question, and i would really appreciate it if you could help me out again :)

to reduce the confusion, let me briefly list and explain the content for the subjects

data analytic: intro to data mining, visual exploration of data mining, data preprocessing transformation, association rules mining, classification and prediction (such as tree introduction bayesian, classification by backpropagation, etc), clustering, mining sequential data, and etc

adv db: exploration data mining, application dw, datamart, corporate data resources, data resources integration, transaction processing support

object relational db: programming SQL :)

unix: learning unix lol

operation system for network security: unix is prerequisite - (for ms 200x release, cisco, unix, etc) learning about process, cpu scheduling, deadlock, main memory, virtual memory, network security, file system, SElinux in practice, routing security, etc

web svc tech & app: intro to distributed system, EAI, socket programming, web svc programming (SOAP, WSDL, UDDI), platform, svc oriented architecture, etc, etc. the course is half based on research i guess? and nearly half programming

enterprise computing: intro to enterprise computing, component framework and architecture (OMG CORBA, COM/DCOM, J2EE, Microsoft .Net), Data integration methods and techniques, e-business integration: standards and technologies, EDI, BizTalk, RosettaNet, ebXML, Emerging trends in enterprise computing: Utility Computing, WEB 2.0, Enterprise 2.0, Software as a Services (SaaS): benefits and challenges, examples. it will be based on research assignments, presentation, and a final

so i'm trying to pick one out of three ways. i will take unix (i mean its good to know for programming right??), and O-R DB for sure

** i'm confused whether i should take data analytic and unix prior taking object relation database course in case it will help?

** and i'm also confused whether i should learn adv database (which covers this and that but don't think it covers specific for each) or just pure data mining?? they all seem to be useful

1. unix --> OR DB --> web svc computing (and eliminate enterprise computing? bc it seems useless? pure research/case study right?) and operation system for network security

2. unix --> OR-DB, adv. DB --> web svc + os for network security or data analytic (what do you recommend?)

3. data analytic --> OR--DB + unix --> web svc + os for network security

thank you :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:

  • 0

I would go for the second option, with network security. I strongly believe that learning *nix (whether that be FreeBSD, Linux, or some other UNIX variant) is extremely beneficial for any serious developer and should be done fairly early on. (Disclaimer: I am a heavy Debian Linux user, so I might be slightly biased in that regard.) Neither data anlaytic nor enterprise computing seems particularly useful to me based on your descriptions. For a backend web developer/sysadmin type of position, UNIX -> OR-DB + Adv. DB -> Web Svc + OS Net Sec seems like the right order to me. Dr_Asik, feel free to disagree with me again.

  • 0

I'd also vote for option 2, because lets face the majority of internet runs on Linux so knowing the basic concepts of how it works would be a good idea. Even if you are only doing programming, especially web-based stuff, its always good to know the ins and outs of the platform you'll be dealing with.

(Also I am a part time Linux user/sysadmin so I might be a bit biased.)

  • 0

I'd go for .NET; it's one of the best object oriented languages IMO (and there's not much disagreement that VS is by far the best IDE), and it runs on/has been ported to a variety of operating systems (including Windows, Linux, OSX, Windows Phone, iOS, etc.).

As for which will have more demand, I would have to say that in the business market you'll probably looking at .NET and other OOP languages, but if you're planning on working for Facebook or starting your own Internet company I'd go with the second level of web development. As long as you have the basics of web development down, imo, it shouldn't be too hard to learn the rest of it (and the rest of it will definitely be easier to learn if you've spent some time learning .NET).

  • 0

xorangekiller,

thank you so much for your reply. ive realized that you replied for both of my questions.

trust me they were long long questions lol but i truly appreciate it :D :D

your answers rly helped me a lot!!

I would go for the second option, with network security. I strongly believe that learning *nix (whether that be FreeBSD, Linux, or some other UNIX variant) is extremely beneficial for any serious developer and should be done fairly early on. (Disclaimer: I am a heavy Debian Linux user, so I might be slightly biased in that regard.) Neither data anlaytic nor enterprise computing seems particularly useful to me based on your descriptions. For a backend web developer/sysadmin type of position, UNIX -> OR-DB + Adv. DB -> Web Svc + OS Net Sec seems like the right order to me. Dr_Asik, feel free to disagree with me again.

hmmm i see i see!!!

thx for the advice :D :D

I'd also vote for option 2, because lets face the majority of internet runs on Linux so knowing the basic concepts of how it works would be a good idea. Even if you are only doing programming, especially web-based stuff, its always good to know the ins and outs of the platform you'll be dealing with.

(Also I am a part time Linux user/sysadmin so I might be a bit biased.)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A different thing with Russia. When you say is it better, depends on things. It is better that we don't have the E.U making rules and laws that have nothing to do with them. Is the trading part better? No, that is really mucked up, but then we knew that was going to happen and we would have make agreements, like we do with other parts of the world. Freedom of movement is certainly better, but could be improved, we still need more control over our borders. do you live in the U.K?
    • So what am I quoting from them? I never listened to what Farage or his cronies said. I wanted the U.K to leave the E.u years before the referendum and it had nothing to do with Farage and his cronies. So what country do you live in? Did we work much better together? We were always at logger heads with the E.U because we disagreed with them so much. Maggie was always on at them. I would have thought the E.U was glad to get rid of us as we stopped the integration or made it a two tier. Now without us they can integrate more. I would not have voted out if it was just a trading block and we can still work together on somethings.
    • MPC-BE 1.9.0 by Razvan Serea Media Player Classic - BE is a free and open source audio and video player for Windows. Media Player Classic - BE is based on the original "Media Player Classic" project (Gabest) and "Media Player Classic Home Cinema" project (Casimir666), contains additional features and bug fixes. The BE mod (Black Edition Mod) is a skinned version of Media Player Classic Home Cinema, much better looking than the plain old MPC. MPC-BE 1.9.0 changelog: Splitters Fixed crashes in some situations. AudioSplitter Added support for the RF64 format. Fixed reading of channel layout for some WavPack files. Added support for ID3 tags for Wave64 files. Unknown Wave64 chunks are now ignored. AviSplitter Added support for 'y408' video. Improved support for 'HEVC' video. FLVSplitter Added support for VVC video. MP4Splitter Improved handling of corrupted files. MatroskaSplitter Expanded support for V_UNCOMPRESSED video codecs. Fixed support for frame rotation (ProjectionPoseRoll). Improved support for "V_MS/VFW/FOURCC / HEVC". MpcDvdVideoDecoder Fixed conversion to YUY2. Fixed display of menus for some DVD-Videos. RoQVideoDecoder Output in NV12 and YV12 formats is allowed. Full range is used. MPC Video Decoder RGB32 format will be output as a top-down bitmap by default. Added support for the "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadataV2" interface. Removed support for the deprecated "IID_MediaSideDataDOVIMetadata" interface. Fixed retrieving the name of the video adapter when using NVDEC. Fixed crashes in some situations. MPC Video Converter Added support for AYUV video format. MpcAudioRenderer Improved input format validation. Optimized retrieval of supported formats for exclusive mode. Added the "Keep audio device active when paused" setting. Fixed crashes and freezes in various situations. Subtitles Added the ability to open the properties of an external subtitle renderer in the "Subtitles" settings panel. Fixed external subtitle connections for VSFilter. Fixed a crash when rendering PGS/SUP subtitles when using AVX2. YouTube Improved support for yt-dlp. The built-in YouTube parser is no longer used. Player The HTTP read strategy has been changed. If the playlist contains one entry, more key combinations can be used to control the player (jump through chapters, adjust volume). Improved support for reading ASX playlists. The translation of the MediaInfo report for Chinese, Korean and Japanese has been removed. Added blocking of 32-bit filter "PICVideo Lossless JPEG Decompressor" (pvljpg20.dll), because it crashes. Added blocking of the system filter "AVI Decompressor", which will eliminate the crash of VFW codecs. Fixed a rare crash when using the "/slave" key. Fixed a crash when getting a list of fonts for OSD. Added the ability to load an external audio file using hotkeys. Fixed opening a network path starting with \?\UNC. The "Determine duration when adding" playlist setting now works for YouTube video URLs. The "Online media services" settings panel has been redesigned. Added a "Merge files using FFmpeg" option to the file saving dialog. This option is activated when playing multiple streams obtained using yt-dlp. Added loading of local .dpl playlists ("DAUMPLAYLIST"). Fixed a hang when the user closes the player during the URL opening process. Various interface fixes. Installer Updated MPC Video Renderer 0.10.5. Updated MPC Script Source 0.2.17. Added MPC Image Source 0.3.6. Translations Updated Japanese translation (by tsubasanouta). Updated Chinese (Traditional) and Dutch translation (by beter). Updated Romanian translation (by Andrei Miloiu). Updated Hungarian translation (by mickey). Updated Turkish translation (by cmhrky). Updated German translation (by Klaus1189). Updated Chinese (Simplified) translation (by wushantao). Updated Italian translation (by mapi68). Updated Korean translation (by Hackjjang). Updated Chinese (Traditional) (by udfbe). Updated libraries dav1d 1.5.3-6-g04b69f9; ffmpeg n8.2-dev-1857-g4653e68aab; libpng git-v1.6.55-9-g7d52a8087; Little-CMS git-lcms2.18-26-gf739cda; MediaInfo git-v26.05-38-g702c9b7fd; ZenLib git-v0.4.41-91-g073f297; zlib 1.3.2. Download: MPC-BE 64-bit | Portable MPC-BE 64-bit | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: MPC-BE 32-bit | Portable MPC-BE 32-bit Link: Media Player Classic - BE Home Page Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Apple reportedly looks to blacklisted Chinese memory chips as RAM prices climb by Karthik Mudaliar Image via Apple Apple is reportedly trying to get a clearance from the Trump administration to buy memory from ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) to get some relief from soaring DRAM prices. As per a report by the Financial Times, Apple approached the Commerce Department more than a month ago and also spoke to other officials and allies in Washington. For starters, CXMT is a company that's already been placed on the Pentagon's list of Chinese military companies. The Chinese company is the country's top DRAM maker. For Apple, the timing is certainly awkward but not surprising. Tim Cook had recently warned that Apple would have to raise prices because AI companies are buying up large amounts of memory for data centers, and just like that, Apple raised MacBook and iPad prices. Micron also recently revealed that customers have committed billions of dollars to secure memory supply years in advance, which shows us how aggressive securing infrastructure has become. This gives suppliers such as Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron more leverage, while pushing hardware makers to look for alternatives. CXMT is one of those alternatives, but not the simplest one. Apple has spent many years trying to diversify parts of its supply chain away from China, especially for final assembly, while still depending heavily on Chinese manufacturing and suppliers. Even domestic brands from China are moving towards CXMT and YMTC instead of relying on Samsung, Micron, and SK Hynix. For Apple, though, it would invite more scrutiny than local Chinese companies. For now, this is more like a lobbying effort rather than a confirmed supply deal. There's no official statement from either of the parties. What is clearer, though, is the pressure behind such a request. AI demand has certainly made hardware a bottleneck, and companies are trying everything they can to bring things back to normal, even if that means making politically sensitive choices. Source: Financial Times
    • I did test it a month or so back, but ... the results I expect to be on the first page are not there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!