• 0

What do you look for when choosing a web host?


Question

I've been looking for a new host recently, and to be honest I'm at a loss. It seems to me that pretty much every host I look at has 99.9% uptime, all the same features (Cpanel, mysql, bla bla), and with shared hosting the upload/download speeds are largely the same if we ignore the huge websites like bluehost, hostgator, etc. and the costs for hosting small websites is ridiculously cheap everywhere.

So what I was wondering was how do you go about determining which web host to choose? Do you go by hosting review sites, or personal recommendations from friends? The only discernible feature I can think of is customer service, which I would probably say is the biggest thing influencing me right now, but with so many companies out there you would think some of them would be able to differentiate themselves. Or perhaps I'm just missing something obvious.

9 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Media Temple is definitely for developers, you would love them if you'd want mad control on a dedicated server. The servers use Plesk instead of Cpanel though.

Although you said that you'd ignore em. Host Gator has good features for dedicated servers and are usually meant for those who don't know much about all the hosting, thus using customer support to get what you need.

But to be really honest about what I really want. I'd want one of my Mac's being used as a server at home so I can have complete control of everything at home. Of course it's more expensive, but in the coming time, hopefully what I host will provide the revenue to cover it all.

  • 0

Media Temple is definitely for developers, you would love them if you'd want mad control on a dedicated server. The servers use Plesk instead of Cpanel though.

Although you said that you'd ignore em. Host Gator has good features for dedicated servers and are usually meant for those who don't know much about all the hosting, thus using customer support to get what you need.

But to be really honest about what I really want. I'd want one of my Mac's being used as a server at home so I can have complete control of everything at home. Of course it's more expensive, but in the coming time, hopefully what I host will provide the revenue to cover it all.

Yeah media temple is the best I've known but too expensive in my opinion :p

  • 0

I usually go for cost, I'm using free hosting justnow for a test website but usually I use a VPS for more control.

However, most hosts are pretty good nowadays, there isn't the big differences like their used to be.

price and root access is what I look for

  • 0

shared hosting isn't really differentiated between different hosts.

a few pointers:

- stay as far away from GoDaddy & affiliates as possible

- read reviews, get recommendations, synthesize as much as you can find on a host

- review their actual restrictions, everybody claims stuff like unlimited storage/bandwidth but you'll never get anywhere near either before you hit CPU, RAM, or database restrictions.

- research how the company treats customers and how easy it is to leave

- some niche features may vary between hosts: SFTP access, FastCGI, different versions of PHP/MySQL, php.ini override

- the best hosts tend to be smaller ones, they are much better than the big names, but a lot more small hosts just popped out of nowhere. avoid ones where you can't find any information about. the big names are kinda a safe starting point if you don't want to worry too much.

  • 0

If you're looking for free hosting with a custom domain, I'd recommend 000webhost.com.

If you're willing to pay a bit, I'd go with the shared or reserved Windows Azure for Websites plans because they're easy to scale and have great support, IME.

currently I'm using the free Windows Azure web hosting with a custom, cURL-based proxy running on 000webhost to handle custom domains.

I generally look for websites that are running on those hosts, and then browse through their forums (or send them a help request) to see how often they general respond to help requests. Also look through the forums for any indications of recurring problems (consistent downtime, unsupported features, etc.).

  • 0

For just starting out I am really loving windows azure... it's a bit different then normal hosting tho...

the UI is fantastic and very easy to set up anything.... I got my vm setup within minutes. I got custom domains on mine.

For enterprise I recommend inetu becuase it's fully managed they take care of literally everything... and they've had no downtime and you never hear anything bad about them... that's why I partnered with them! :D

inetu hosts pokemon.com, bmw, and sony music's sites as well as segway and CREDO mobile to give you a few names...

  • 0

There in the same country as me, and hopefully as local as possible. Saying that though my current hosting company is a few hundread miles away but been plased with them.

Also, oddly enough, I don't look for the cheapest, I usually look for the more high-end prices

  • 0

Media Temple is definitely for developers, you would love them if you'd want mad control on a dedicated server. The servers use Plesk instead of Cpanel though.

Although you said that you'd ignore em. Host Gator has good features for dedicated servers and are usually meant for those who don't know much about all the hosting, thus using customer support to get what you need.

But to be really honest about what I really want. I'd want one of my Mac's being used as a server at home so I can have complete control of everything at home. Of course it's more expensive, but in the coming time, hopefully what I host will provide the revenue to cover it all.

Hey there! Just wanted to say thank you for the kind words about (mt) Media Temple. :)

If you ever need any help from us or have any questions about our products, Twitter is a great way to get in touch: @MediaTemple

DrewJ

(mt) Media Temple

@MediaTemple

  • 0

Hey there! Just wanted to say thank you for the kind words about (mt) Media Temple. :)

If you ever need any help from us or have any questions about our products, Twitter is a great way to get in touch: @MediaTemple

DrewJ

(mt) Media Temple

@MediaTemple

No doubt :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      212
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!