• 0

Streaming MP3 playlist on Windows over the net


Question

Hey everyone

I have a around a hundred hours of MP3s saved locally that are linked to in an .m3u playlist in the same folder. These are not stored on my laptop but rather on a file server. I'd like to stream these to my laptop over the net, using something like the Shoutcast protocol. I'd like to be able to open the stream in iTunes.

Does anyone know of any software for Windows that will let me do this easily? Icecast looks a little complicated, I'm not even sure it has MP3 support built in due to patent issues (maybe you have to compile it from source?)

The files are also labelled sequentially (001_song.mp3, 002_song.mp3) so if the software can't load an .m3u that isn't a problem.

Thanks for reading!

Addendum: gapless playback would be a huge plus

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

You mention iTunes, but I know Winamp handles Shoutcast streams with ease, as both the server and playback client. It's been several years since I did this, but I do remember it was relatively straight-forward to setup and get running. In fact, the hardest part (if you could call it that) was opening up the relevant ports in my router.

As I say, not sure how well iTunes handles shoutcast streams (if at all), but I would certainly recommend Winamp instead.

  • 0

Hey everyone

I have a around a hundred hours of MP3s saved locally that are linked to in an .m3u playlist in the same folder. These are not stored on my laptop but rather on a file server. I'd like to stream these to my laptop over the net, using something like the Shoutcast protocol. I'd like to be able to open the stream in iTunes.

Does anyone know of any software for Windows that will let me do this easily? Icecast looks a little complicated, I'm not even sure it has MP3 support built in due to patent issues (maybe you have to compile it from source?)

The files are also labelled sequentially (001_song.mp3, 002_song.mp3) so if the software can't load an .m3u that isn't a problem.

Thanks for reading!

Addendum: gapless playback would be a huge plus

Actually Xbox Music for Windows 8 is designed to do this, however, Microsoft is not providing proper support for all local music files. If they fix this, that will be a nifty solution to your problem but don't hold your breath. They want to force you to purchase and Xbox Music pass and buy all of your music from the Xbox Music store. Let's hope they see the error of their ways.

If you properly tag your rips, the Xbox cloud may recognized them in their database and you will be able to stream them (or most of them anyway).

  • 0

You mention iTunes, but I know Winamp handles Shoutcast streams with ease, as both the server and playback client. It's been several years since I did this, but I do remember it was relatively straight-forward to setup and get running. In fact, the hardest part (if you could call it that) was opening up the relevant ports in my router.

As I say, not sure how well iTunes handles shoutcast streams (if at all), but I would certainly recommend Winamp instead.

Thank you. The laptop is running OS X which is why I'd like to use iTunes -- it's much better on Mac than on Windows. The new beta Winamp for OS X may also solve my issue. I will try the streaming server portion of Winamp. Maybe it will even be UPnP compatible now :)

Actually Xbox Music for Windows 8 is designed to do this, however, Microsoft is not providing proper support for all local music files. If they fix this, that will be a nifty solution to your problem but don't hold your breath. They want to force you to purchase and Xbox Music pass and buy all of your music from the Xbox Music store. Let's hope they see the error of their ways.

If you properly tag your rips, the Xbox cloud may recognized them in their database and you will be able to stream them (or most of them anyway).

I see. Unfortunately although the rips are tagged, they are pretty obscure electronic songs that aren't available for purchase anywhere except Beatport, so I doubt Xbox Music would have them. I am also running Server 2008 R2 and I don't believe I will get access to the Windows 8 apps without an upgrade to Server 2012.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Now 8GB of ram looks even worse in the Neo. I'm so happy I purchased 128GB of DDR 4 when I did.... paid $174. Upgraded my parents laptop to 32GB around the same time for $48. Luckily I have a TON of spare laptops. So i'm good on laptops for a while. I also have a lot of desktops too that I could use if i had to. Lets just hope nothing happens to my main 4 monitor couch workstation.
    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!