Recommended Posts

One of my customers is having us setup an Exchange 2013 cluster with Windows Server 2012, but they want us to use a DMZ Network on their firewall.

Because the server roles have changed, and Exchange will need Active Directory services, we're wondering if the best case scenario to meet there security expectations is to create a Virtual machine with Exchange 2010 transport roles in the DMZ.

Will this setup/configuration work or is this not recommended?

Will any ports have to be opened for the 2010 transport server to communicate with active directory?

depending on how the dmz is setup, you will need ports 25 (for mail in and out), 50389 and 50636 (these two ports are for secure active directory) and if you want to manage with rdp 3389. You will be fine with putting this in a vm server.

depending on how the dmz is setup, you will need ports 25 (for mail in and out), 50389 and 50636 (these two ports are for secure active directory) and if you want to manage with rdp 3389. You will be fine with putting this in a vm server.

Thanks dude.... now is the Transport Server what we need to make this work with the DMZ? I'm installing Hyper V/Server 2k8 with Exchange 2k10 as we speak.....

What we want is to place the edge transport server in the DMZ with the least amount of open ports to meet the company's network security policies.

Can this server be a standalone server that is not a member of the domain with it's only purpose is to be a transport server?

Would you be wanting an edge transport server role then? Your wanting to simply have something in the DMZ to accept traffic on port 25 and perform simple spam/security checks which isn't AD reliant?

I think you maybe confusing Edge transport (not AD reliant and made for DMZ) with hub transport (AD Reliant, needs to be 'inside')?

Exchange 2010 Edge Transport

Edge Transport is an optional role that can be installed to prevent spam and virus. This role is meant to replace spam filtering devices such as Barracuda Spam firewall and Symantec mail security. This role is installed on a stand-alone server (workgroup) and uses ADAM to sync LDAP data from Active directory. This allows recipient filtering on Edge Transport server.

What we want is to place the edge transport server in the DMZ with the least amount of open ports to meet the company's network security policies.

Can this server be a standalone server that is not a member of the domain with it's only purpose is to be a transport server?

Sorry for my earlier posts, juts seen this of yours where you clearly state you want to put the Edge transport role in the DMZ.

You'll need to configure ADAM (Active Directory Application Mode) so that the edge transport server (workgroup not domain member) can 'talk' to AD and filter recipients correctly.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!