Recommended Posts

Apart from a number of casting announcements over the last few months, we haven?t heard much from History?s upcoming original series ?Vikings,? which is set to feature as much sword-swinging action as fellow beloved genre series like ?Game of Thrones? and the upcoming ?Spartacus: War of the Damned.? No longer need we wait! History has released our first look at the epic action of ?Vikings,? a bit light on the story, but nonetheless cool. Get your first taste of ?Vikings? blood inside!

Want to catch a sneak peek of History?s next great sword-swinger ?Vikings?? Entertainment Weekly snagged a first look at the new series, set to debut in 2013, featuring plenty of battle if precious little glimpse of the story or its recognizable actors.

Having previously cast veteran actor Gabriel Byrne for the series, ?Vikings? features Travis Fimmel in the central role of Ragnar Lothbrok, Viking hero of the tale, while joining him are Jessalyn Gilsig (?Glee?) as Siggy, the wife of Earl Haraldson (Byrne), Gustaf Skarsgard as Ragnar?s friend Floki, Clive Standen as his devious cousin Rollo, and Katheryn Winnick as first wife, and warrior Lagertha.

?Vikings? follows actual historical figure Ragnar Lothbrok, considered to be the greatest hero of his age. The series tells the sagas of Ragnar?s band of Viking brothers and his family, as he rises to become King of the Viking tribes. As well as being a fearless warrior, Ragnar embodies the Norse traditions of devotion to the gods. According to the report, ?legend has it that he was a direct descendent of Odin, the god of war and warriors.?

?Vikings? will set sail in 2013 as a 10-episode drama from MGM TV and ?The Tudors? and ?Camelot? creators Michael Hirst and Morgan O?Sullivan. The series had been announced for development early in 2011, but was only picked up by The History Channel this past March.

http://screencrush.com/historys-vikings-trailer/

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1126746-history-channel/
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

While it's historically incorrect (ironically) and stereotypical it still looks both awesome and interesting! Vikings, even when portrayed as bloodthirsty Brits, can never go wrong!

And this is why I don't watch the history channel anymore. I love shows like this, but this isn't what would make me watch the history channel.

  • Like 1

And this is why I don't watch the history channel anymore. I love shows like this, but this isn't what would make me watch the history channel.

Such a fair point. I didn't even know they made non-factual productions.

Well! A month until we see if it's any good!

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

I like the series, it's well-made and entertaining. However, as predicted, it's pretty much a contrary to historical facts. Also, traders and raiders alike were happily going west and loved the idea, we were equals and scorned the idea of slaves and pretty much lived with democracy, rather than an autocratic ruler.

But, again, I don't care; it's a TV series and it's fun to watch. :D

Even if the show was any good I wouldn't support it. The History Channel should be reserved for documentaries about history, not reenactments or dramas - especially if they're not historically accurate. Unfortunately the History Channel has little to do with history any more and everything to do with appealing to the masses. What little history it does show is hugely over dramatised and tends to focus on only a handful of subjects (WWII, ancient Egypt, etc). It has absolutely no integrity.

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!